Results 1 to 25 of 131

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,188
    And you have the same tired old "I can hear it but I can't prove it" and "what do you expect from that mid fi junk you listen to?" Seems like you haven't give up either.

  2. #2
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    6
    I worked for an audio shop for a month and I can tell you that the differance between a $15 cable and a $80 is the $15 cable makes about $1 commission and the $80 cable makes $9. Cables are marked up about 50-60%. The cable industry just wants your money, I mean the $80 cable must sound better then the $15 cable, it cost more and looks better, right?

  3. #3
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by skeptic
    And you have the same tired old "I can hear it but I can't prove it" and "what do you expect from that mid fi junk you listen to?" Seems like you haven't give up either.
    The difference is that I qualify my comments with respect to the system involved. You make unsupported blanket claims. Which is indeed valid for the majority of folks asking what cable they should use with their Onkyo receiver.

    rw

  4. #4
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,720
    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
    The difference is that I qualify my comments with respect to the system involved. You make unsupported blanket claims. Which is indeed valid for the majority of folks asking what cable they should use with their Onkyo receiver.

    rw

    You can qualify you statement with anything you like. You still don't have supporting evidence, just speculations, guesses, daydreams. But, some are very happy with dreams. Enjoy.
    mtrycrafts

  5. #5
    Veg-O-Matic ToddB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    222
    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
    The difference is that I qualify my comments with respect to the system involved. You make unsupported blanket claims. Which is indeed valid for the majority of folks asking what cable they should use with their Onkyo receiver.

    rw
    Not necessarily, since I've had these speaker cables:

    14 AWG zip cord
    XLO ER-14
    Kimber Kable KWIK-16
    Kimber Kable 4PR

    and these interconnects:

    Radio Shack Gold
    XLO Twinax Plus
    Kimber Kable Tonik

    in this system:

    Onkyo TX-8211 receiver
    Sony CDP-XE500 CD player
    Paradigm Titan or Mini Monitor speakers
    Paradigm PDR-8 or PDR-12 subwoofer

    and it was easy enough to hear differences between the cables, even at this low level of resolution.

  6. #6
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by ToddB
    ... and it was easy enough to hear differences between the cables, even at this low level of resolution.
    Didn't mean to slight your system, but I was taking a conservative approach for the theorists and parrots here who don't get it.

    rw

  7. #7
    Veg-O-Matic ToddB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    222
    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
    Didn't mean to slight your system, but I was taking a conservative approach for the theorists and parrots here who don't get it.

    rw
    I know, I just didn't want anyone thinking that they had to resign themselves to using crappy cables because their gear isn't good enough. I've replaced cables in a system that consisted of a mass market and low cost receiver and CD player, and 15-20 year old Pioneer full-range speakers, and the improvements over the old cables were still audible and worthwhile. What's great is that non-audiophiles who've heard these systems before and after the cable changes have also been able to hear the improvements with the new cables. I guess nobody had ever told them that they weren't allowed to hear any audible improvements from just a cable change.

  8. #8
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,720
    Quote Originally Posted by ToddB
    What's great is that non-audiophiles who've heard these systems before and after the cable changes have also been able to hear the improvements with the new cables. I guess nobody had ever told them that they weren't allowed to hear any audible improvements from just a cable change.
    I suppose this is somehow better than a testimonial on TV? Why would they be exepmt from human gullibility? Or the basic humand need for changes whether one took place or not?
    I don't suppose you confirmed this observation with bias controlled listening, right?
    mtrycrafts

  9. #9
    Veg-O-Matic ToddB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    222
    Quote Originally Posted by mtrycraft
    I suppose this is somehow better than a testimonial on TV?
    You are free to give my comments as much or as little credence as you like.

    Why would they be exepmt from human gullibility? Or the basic humand need for changes whether one took place or not?
    Why would they be exempt from acknowledging reality is the more relevant question. As to how any "basic humand need" factored into what they heard, I'm not as comfortable playing freelance psychologist as you apparently are, so I won't venture a guess. I suppose you'll have to ask them if you really want to know.

    I don't suppose you confirmed this observation with bias controlled listening, right?
    No, my bias prevents me from being that anal about evaluating the sound of audio components.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Review of Bose 901s
    By sam_pro in forum Speakers
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-06-2007, 07:31 AM
  2. bi-wiring
    By sleeper_red in forum Cables
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 12-19-2004, 02:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •