Quote Originally Posted by mtrycraft
My advice was to listen for oneself and not accept the arguments of others, either for or against bi-wiring.



Fine. But you fell way short with that advice. You failed to inform about the vagaries of sighetd listening to determine audible differences. It doesn't work too well.You left this out because you yourself don't know? Or, you may be worried about the truth?



What I hear is a VAST improvement over the receiver-based system I had before.

Maybe yes, maybe no.

I would consider my current system minimalist,

Oh, like SET amps? Passive preamps?
LOL.


My "reward" is listening to the finest reproduction and spatial presentation I have ever heard from my CDs.

Maybe yes, maybe no.

but all you are really doing is telling us that to this point, you have failed to experience the top quality sound that is available to us all if we really try to match and balance our equipment for peak performance.

Or, you just think that is what you are accomplishing.

Apparently, you blame your lack of such an experience on voodoo of some kind, rather than your own absence of understanding.

My experience is irrelevant to what your claims are and what can be demonstrated.
Fine. But you fell way short with that advice. You failed to inform about the vagaries of sighetd listening to determine audible differences. It doesn't work too well.You left this out because you yourself don't know? Or, you may be worried about the truth?

Just as your absolutist advice to newcomers falls way short by failing to explain it is based solely on "not proven". I guess that makes two of you who may be worried about the truth.

Oh, like SET amps? Passive preamps?
LOL.

You are at your finest when you're behaving in an arrogant, condescending manner. Is passive agressive behavior a component of the scientific method?