Pathos Logos!

[Mike Anderson]

. By the way, The old Logos ,not sure about the new, did not use an INPOL circuit.

I didn't know there was a "new" and "old" Logos - where do you see this info?

[theaudiohobby]

I didn't know there was a "new" and "old" Logos - where do you see this info?

Well this is a review of the old model, they have since released a new Logos.

[Bernd]

Well this is a review of the old model, they have since released a new Logos.

Absolute rubbish.

Classic One
Logos
Inpol2
Cinema-X
In Control
In Power
TT

This is the line up of Pathos Intgrated and Pre Power amps. The Inpol 2 is similar looking then the Logos. However it is a completely different amp. It is frustrating when people make comments about something they have absolutley no clue about.
Please get your information right and then bring something new to the table. As I said before"You are devoid of original thought".

Bernd

[theaudiohobby]

Unlke the TT, the Logos doesn't use the firm's proprietary INPOL circuitry ,Stereophile November 2003

Boy..oh..boy Bernd. aren't we touchy! INPOL is the name of the proprietary circuit in some of the Pathos amplifiers. If you took time to read the link that I got off Pathos site no less, it is explicitly stated that the Logos does not have an INPOL circuit, but the Classic One has. It pays to know what you are talking about rather than letting your emotions get the better of you. By the way, the 70W Classic One is a MKII, another fact that is not explicitly stated on Pathos' site.

[Bernd]

Unlke the TT, the Logos doesn't use the firm's proprietary INPOL circuitry ,Stereophile November 2003

Boy..oh..boy Bernd. aren't we touchy! INPOL is the name of the proprietary circuit in some of the Pathos amplifiers. If you took time to read the link that I got off Pathos site no less, it is explicitly stated that the Logos does not have an INPOL circuit, but the Classic One has. It pays to know what you are talking about rather than letting your emotions get the better of you. By the way, the 70W Classic One is a MKII, another fact that is not stated on the Pathos site

Not touchy at all. Just don't like to read miss-information.You stated a "new Logos"-no such thing. The Inpol2 is a Different amplifier-Period. I do know what I am talking about when it comes to the Logos. I did own one. Did you? We already covered the Classic one MKll so you are a bit late with that.
I would say with Florian having experience with the Maggies 1.6 and the Classic One and my knowledge of the Logos, this does put us in a more informed position-wouldn't you say.


Bernd

[theaudiohobby]

Not touchy at all. Just don't like to read miss-information.You stated a "new Logos"-no such thing. The Inpol2 is a Different amplifier-Period. I do now what I am talking about when it comes to the Logos. I did own one. Did you? We already covered the Classic one MKll so you are a bit late with that.

I made a statement of fact about the Logos, even cited links, Anyway I was not discussing INPOL2, I was discussing the Logos (MK1?), it does not have an INPOL circuit, a statement of fact regardless of ownership.

I would say with Florian having experience with the Maggies 1.6 and the Classic One and my knowledge of the Logos, this does put us in a more informed position-wouldn't you say.

Enjoy your Sharp.

Bernd

Actually my original comments about the Classic One were spot on, a fact that is obliquely attested by Mike's first post on this thread. Do you or Florian have a more informed opinion, based on the evidence so far, I think not.

Thanks by the way, I am enjoying my Sharp.

[Bernd]

I made a statement of fact about the Logos, even cited links, Anyway I was not discussing INPOL2, I was discussing the Logos (MK1?), it does not have an INPOL circuit, a statement of fact regardless of ownership.



Actually my original comments about the Classic One were spot on, a fact that is obliquely attested by Mike's first post on this thread. Do you or Florian have a more informed opinion, based on the evidence so far, I think not.

Yes, and I was stating the Logos is the Logos there is no original or new version. Please show me your evidence that there are two versions of the Logos.
It appears to me, you are after confrontation again.

[Florian]

Well lets not start a **** kicking match. We all know what systems we have and where we stand, so no need to get into that.

To Bernd: Dont bother, like we spoke before and came to the conclusion that some things are just hopeless.

To Hobby: I have no idea what point your trying to make, what your trying to say or what this argument is over. Can you please state your point again and what it has to do with this thread?

[theaudiohobby]

By the way Bernd, did you even read any of the links before replying? Just noticed that your commentary was totally oblivious of the preceeding posts.

[Bernd]

I didn't know there was a "new" and "old" Logos - where do you see this info?

Mike,

There is no new and old Logos. There is the Logos and there is the Inpol2. Look similar but completely different amps.For high current demand with your panel speakers you will need the Classic One or the Logos.
The TT and the Inpol2 have less power and play better with sensitive speakers. They also sound clearer and sweeter as they should for the increase incost.
Tubes went off today.

Bernd

[Florian]

Dude, just wait! I was in Switzerland listening to some OTL's and Acoustats so i am replying late. Wait till you have the 1.6 and buy the QED cables, trust me. The Classic One had more then enough power and the thing doesnt sound bright either. Just wait, its all about matching and patience. Dont touch the tubes and mess with it, get the basics done right first. (isolation, placement, cabling, sources etc...impedance matching) and then go and tune