Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 102
  1. #26
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    96
    Thanks to all for the help so far. After thinking, it seems it will be more feasible for me to replace my source first and the amp after. I think I want to look at the cambridge 540 and 640 models, if I eventually go with either the NAD 320 or cambridge 540 amp, will I hear a difference between those 2 cd players? Just trying to determine if it is worth it to spend the extra $ for the 640. Thanks.

  2. #27
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by funnyhat
    I think I want to look at the cambridge 540 and 640 models, if I eventually go with either the NAD 320 or cambridge 540 amp, will I hear a difference between those 2 cd players?
    I was in the market for a CD player about 18 months ago and auditioned the Cambridge 540 and 640 along with the Rotel 1072. All were powered by the Cambridge 640A. Almost immediately, I eliminated the 540C from the A/B tests as it didn't compete in terms of definition and presentation. It's possible that the B&W speakers colored my impression as I didn't like their overall sound (lots of detail but no body or bass). After 45 minutes of comparing the 640 and 1072, I settled on the Rotel. Though I'm happy with my choice, I've always thought the decision might have been driven by which player best compensated for the speakers' shortcomings. Nonetheless, the 540C and 640C definitely sounded different from one another, so I would audition both.

  3. #28
    test the blind blindly emorphien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    919
    Quote Originally Posted by funnyhat
    Thanks to all for the help so far. After thinking, it seems it will be more feasible for me to replace my source first and the amp after. I think I want to look at the cambridge 540 and 640 models, if I eventually go with either the NAD 320 or cambridge 540 amp, will I hear a difference between those 2 cd players? Just trying to determine if it is worth it to spend the extra $ for the 640. Thanks.
    There are enough differences over the Cambridge 540 to make the 640 a better choice. A lot of people will tell you there's more going on inside than just more watts, and that a considerable overhaul was performed making it the much better unit in more ways than power. Audition them to see for yourself.

    As for a CD player, I listened to the Cambridge 540 and 640C but ultimately liked the NAD C542 the best.

  4. #29
    AR Newbie Registered Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2
    Buy a Nad352 instead of 320 or 540... 352 sounds pleasurable and relax. And its also dynamic. Just dont expect much transparency and imaging. But its musical tho

  5. #30
    AR Newbie Registered Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    4
    low budget amps are mainly the realm of NAD,rotel and cambridge, just go for the sound you prefer,trust your ears

  6. #31
    RGA
    RGA is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,539
    Actually you know you could very well be better of buying used. I bought a used Sugden A48b for $400.00Cad. With something like the Sugden you are getting a significant step up from IMO any amplifier that I have ever heard from any of these companies.

    You may not get the features like a remote control but there is a certain amount of added pleasure knwoing you are getting something that is a considerable step-up than the entry level units and this is on top of better sound.

    I'd be looking at used amps from Sugden A28, A48B and if you really luck out the A21a, Audio Refinement "Complete" or YBA Integre DT,Arcam Delta 290 integrated. You could look for amps from Roksan, Creek Audio etc.

    Amplifiers are about as safe a second hand buy as you can get.

  7. #32
    AR Newbie Registered Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    4
    I totally agree, if you are prepared to buy second hand, (with a good audition) then some far nice equipment is on offer

  8. #33
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    90
    any advice for Tube Amp can be used with Kef İQ3 (89db) or B&W 602 S3 (90db) in a small room
    Pioneer VSX-AX3 Receiver
    Pioneer Dv-668 Dvd(Ecosse Composer MKII inter.)
    Infocus Screenplay 4805(AR Pro II Component)
    B&W 602 S3 Fronts(Monster THX)
    B&W CLR 60 Center
    B&W CDM-SNT Surr.
    Denon PMA-1500 MK II int. amp.
    Definitive Tech SuperCube II SW
    H/K HD970(Ecosse Composer MKII inter.)
    Marantz CD5001(AR PRO II inter.)
    Marantz PM-17MKII M
    Kef IQ3(Ecosse Cs2.3 wire)
    H/K HD970(Ecosse Composer MKII inter.)

  9. #34
    AR Newbie Registered Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1

    Best Int Amp for my MP3 player....

    Hello Forum....Long time audio Review user, but I have not posted on the Forum site in ages...Here goes... Average audiophile...no Vinyl....mostly Cd's. I have noticed that I have been using my MP3 player a lot more then any other music source at home for a while now. I am looking to purchase an Intergrated Amp, with a sole purpose of using it for my MP3 player. What is the best product for that use.....Not too expensive......And do they make Int. Amps for primary MP3 use?.....Not a fan of any Docking stations....They just sound like portable radios to me......Yes....Bose also.......I dont think it matters, but I have a Zune 120 Gig MP3 player.......Floorstanding, and bookshelf speakers...Probably use my JM Reynauld Twins with this amp....Yes I can hook the MP3 player up to my cd input on my preamp, but I would like a seperate system for this purpose....Any input would be appreciated.....Thank you again....

  10. #35
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659
    Quote Originally Posted by nyrgrs60 View Post
    Hello Forum....Long time audio Review user, but I have not posted on the Forum site in ages...Here goes... Average audiophile...no Vinyl....mostly Cd's. I have noticed that I have been using my MP3 player a lot more then any other music source at home for a while now. I am looking to purchase an Intergrated Amp, with a sole purpose of using it for my MP3 player. What is the best product for that use.....Not too expensive......And do they make Int. Amps for primary MP3 use?.....Not a fan of any Docking stations....They just sound like portable radios to me......Yes....Bose also.......I dont think it matters, but I have a Zune 120 Gig MP3 player.......Floorstanding, and bookshelf speakers...Probably use my JM Reynauld Twins with this amp....Yes I can hook the MP3 player up to my cd input on my preamp, but I would like a seperate system for this purpose....Any input would be appreciated.....Thank you again....
    Any integrated will do the trick but since MS dropped support for Zune hardware, you might want to look on Amazon and get hold of an A/V docking station while they are still available. With that you can use any amp with aux inputs. Pretty soon they won't be making them any more, if they are still making them at all,

  11. #36
    AR Newbie Registered Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1
    You may consider some China made trube amp

  12. #37
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Home Of The Fighting Gamecocks
    Posts
    1,702
    For the money you won't be able beat this EL34 Yaqin tube amp. It's easy to bias and you can low ball their buy-it-now price. I've owned two tube hybrids and sold them both. Why not start out with a tube amp as we all eventually end up there, no matter how many solid states we go through on the way.

    http://cgi.ebay.com/YAQIN-MC-10L-Int...item27bd188cae

  13. #38
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659
    Quote Originally Posted by Poultrygeist View Post
    Why not start out with a tube amp as we all eventually end up there, no matter how many solid states we go through on the way
    No, we don't. That's a lie.

    Besides, this thread is five years old.

  14. #39
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    No tubes for me. I love my Krell and dynamic driver speakers. I once listened to some PMC speakers with a McIntosh tube amp. I kept thinking the bass would be better with some good solid state power.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  15. #40
    frenchmon frenchmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    St. Charles Mo
    Posts
    3,271
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnMichael View Post
    No tubes for me. I love my Krell and dynamic driver speakers. I once listened to some PMC speakers with a McIntosh tube amp. I kept thinking the bass would be better with some good solid state power.
    I've got that SS power in my hybrid....Well I've been going back and forth with the Vincent and Rotel SS. I can see why there are two camps. SS is a cleaner sound, while the distortion of the tubes is romantic. I was at a live concert Sunday and the guitar amps had tubes in them. I noticed that same distortion...
    Music...let it into your soul and be moved....with Canton...Pure Music


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    W10 i5 Quad core processor 8GB RAM/Jriver 20/ Fidelizer Optimizer/ iFI Micro DSD DAC-iUSB 3.0/Vincent SA - T1/Vincent SP-331 MK /MMF-7.1/2M BLACK/MS Phenomena ll+/Canton Vento 830.2

  16. #41
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659
    Quote Originally Posted by frenchmon View Post
    SS is a cleaner sound, while the distortion of the tubes is romantic. I was at a live concert Sunday and the guitar amps had tubes in them. I noticed that same distortion...
    Funny, I've spent my life trying to get rid of as much distortion as possible in my playback system. Now, to intentionally add it in across the board just sticks in my craw.

    But, I can see where the distortion added by tubes can be a boon to music production, such as in wailing, screaming, guitars, fuzzy bass, and other intentionally added sound effects but that just seems to lead to this rusty old caveat:

    "Tubes are great for some electronic music production but solid state is better for all music REproduction."

  17. #42
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Home Of The Fighting Gamecocks
    Posts
    1,702
    Negative feedback is used to lower distortion and in the case of solid state is often the only thing keeping the transitors from exploding. Triode amps OTOH do not employ negative feedback. Negative feedback is not a problem if you don't mind a 2 dimentional sound stage and time smearing.

  18. #43
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Poultrygeist View Post
    Negative feedback is used to lower distortion and in the case of solid state is often the only thing keeping the transitors from exploding. Triode amps OTOH do not employ negative feedback. Negative feedback is not a problem if you don't mind a 2 dimentional sound stage and time smearing.


    Depends on how it is used. Some SS amps have low negative feedbak. During the spec wars they used large amounts of global feedback until someone discovered and measured TIM and then most designers reduced there amounts of feeedback and how it was applied.

    Interesting that we are replying to a 5 year old thread. I hope the OP has found something by now.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  19. #44
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659
    Quote Originally Posted by Poultrygeist View Post
    Triode amps OTOH do not employ negative feedback.
    Well, that explains those high levels of the beloved even-order harmonics tube fans are so fond of. But, fear not. Negative feedback is, in fact, utilized in other classes of tube amps in order to minimize this.

    As for "smearing" in SS amps, you should try using something of quality for a standard instead of those $40.00 T-amps you so love.

    "To keep them from blowing up"??? Oh, come now. When you stoop to these levels of gross exaggeration, or just plain BS, you cast doubt on anything you say among those with any knowledge at all about this hobby.
    Last edited by markw; 08-06-2011 at 10:29 AM.

  20. #45
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    Quote Originally Posted by markw View Post
    Well, that explains those high levels of the beloved even-order harmonics tube fans are so fond of. But, fear not. Negative feedback is, in fact, utilized in other classes of tube amps in order to minimize this.

    As for "smearing" in SS amps, you should try using something of quality for a standard instead of those $40.00 T-amps you so love.



    Yes he could try a Krell S-300i or a Nelson Pass integrated.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  21. #46
    frenchmon frenchmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    St. Charles Mo
    Posts
    3,271
    Quote Originally Posted by markw View Post
    Well, that explains those high levels of the beloved even-order harmonics tube fans are so fond of. But, fear not. Negative feedback is, in fact, utilized in other classes of tube amps in order to minimize this.

    As for "smearing" in SS amps, you should try using something of quality for a standard instead of those $40.00 T-amps you so love.

    "To keep them from blowing up"??? Oh, come now. When you stoop to these levels of gross exaggeration, or just plain BS, you cast doubt on anything you say among those with any knowledge at all about this hobby.
    Yes...or even a Rotel RB 1080 which is 2 or 3 years removed from production...great power amp..with no smearing...and combined with a good preamp and speakers... its good a low level listening.
    Music...let it into your soul and be moved....with Canton...Pure Music


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    W10 i5 Quad core processor 8GB RAM/Jriver 20/ Fidelizer Optimizer/ iFI Micro DSD DAC-iUSB 3.0/Vincent SA - T1/Vincent SP-331 MK /MMF-7.1/2M BLACK/MS Phenomena ll+/Canton Vento 830.2

  22. #47
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Home Of The Fighting Gamecocks
    Posts
    1,702
    I have heard the F1 driving back loaded horns and it is an exceptional amp. Most impressive was the amount of bass this 10 watt high current amp produced from a 4.5 inch Fostex driver.

  23. #48
    RGA
    RGA is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,539
    Negative feedback = BAD
    No Negative Feedback (from tube designs) = Good
    Quasi designs using no feedback but not from tubes = some degree of mediocre - Sugden A21a SS Single Ended No feedback is good if you really don't want a tube amp and good for the money. However - better tube amps for the same money are available - like the Kit One.

    Articles

    http://www.hificritic.com/downloads/Archive_6.pdf

    Audio Note

  24. #49
    frenchmon frenchmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    St. Charles Mo
    Posts
    3,271
    Hey RGA...send me those PM 150 monobocks to mate with the SA-T1...
    Last edited by frenchmon; 08-06-2011 at 01:55 PM.
    Music...let it into your soul and be moved....with Canton...Pure Music


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    W10 i5 Quad core processor 8GB RAM/Jriver 20/ Fidelizer Optimizer/ iFI Micro DSD DAC-iUSB 3.0/Vincent SA - T1/Vincent SP-331 MK /MMF-7.1/2M BLACK/MS Phenomena ll+/Canton Vento 830.2

  25. #50
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659
    While we're generalizing, tube amps have more distortion then solid state amps and, as we all know, distortion is bad, except perhaps for Jimi Hendrix and the like.

    Enjoy your Kool-aid, boys, Some people can sell it succesfully, like Jim Jones, but society hasn't bought it, and never will.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •