Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
Perhaps you are unaware of the meaning of the phrase "largely". It means the majority. Significantly more than half. You take at look at the 1000+ entries found here and attempt to convince us that the majority of his work involves minimally miked material.
I don't believe I mentioned anything about a majority, more assuming perhaps. Are you assuming that mimimal miking could NOT have occured in those 1000+ entries? Are you also assuming that is his entire body of work? Once again your assumption processing is on over drive.


Exactly. You have no idea. You present only speculation.
Oh really now. Now only a fool would think a person that has done more than 1000+ gigs only did it using a few pieces of equipment. Since his career spans 30+ years, equipment has evolved from analog to digital, and from tubes and transistors to DAW's, and from off the shelf stuff to fully custom made. One can gather from that breathe of time that he has used quite a number of recording, mixing, mastering, and monitoring equipment. I know I have in the last 25 years.



Which has zero bearing on why anyone would take your unsubstantiated speculations as gospel.

rw
A great way to side step reality isn't it! Your posturing continues to amaze me.