Shhhhh Don't Tell Pix....Vizio is coming out with...A PLASMA!!!!

[Sir Terrence the Terrible]

Another thing I must address that sir talky said during his latest meltdown.
Its not that our eyes and brains are so "smart " that they weave two fields into
a single picture, the theory is that our eyes are too slow to catch the chicanery
going on behind the scenes.

The process is too fast, our eyes are too slow. What the hell is the difference stupid?

But when theres movement it all falls apart, during casual viewing the pictures fine,
but a progressive picture is A lot more soild and artfact free.

A progressive picture IN THEORY is more solid. However theory usually fails in the field when actual devices are used. In the field, LCD and Plasmas suffer from motion blur, and slow response times which kills the theory dead. You seem to love to side step this fact.

And "cobble" is a word talky used about his system, the famous mercurial system that changes to fit the conversation

You are lying again pixeliar. I never EVER mentioned the word cobble, EVER. Aside from your obvious stupidity, your lying has further killed your credibility.
.

And I had a Mitshu 60in rptvstandard def, very nice, but it showed the failings
of CRT when trying to cast a large picture.

Oh yeah, your cheap a$$ has had everything under the sun. Next you will be telling us you invented the internet. Your 60" was probably the cheap model with 7" CRT's.

Since the brightness drops as the pitch of a CRT increases, a HD crt would be very compromised.

My television meets SMPTE standards for light output on a 65" screen with no problem at all even with 1440p test signals. The Sony G90 meets SMPTE standards on a 300" screen with no problem at all with 1080p signals. HD CRT's are used in every mastering house in Hollywood. So where is your proof of compromise?

THIS IS why it was common to use two projectors in tandem for enough brightness to see the picture, which still required absolute darkness

Two stacked projectors are only used for screen sizes larger than 300". Tell the whole story pixelidiot.

You have a real problem with presenting the WHOLE picture. You put out bits and pieces of a point without regards to the other side of the equation. One deminsional points are useless when discussing complex issues. Generalization are also not helpful because you are not addressing the fact that internal or external processing can be used to mitigate artifacts that are inherent to any visual device.