It's about time the engineering pros take a much harder and in depth look at the whole question meaning accuracy of reproduction of real waveforms using computerized analysis seeking non linear distortions and DBTs to back up their findings. In 1984 this might have been a little new. In 2004 it's kindergarten.

Well, he didn't write it in 2004, did he? What is there to show about wires anyhow that is new?
DBT what? Measurements?
Maybe you might be interested in doing all this fancy measurements for such an article?


However, we've been there, done that a million times too so it's rather boring to read it again.

Only boring to the ones who has seen these a few times, not the new people that are new in audio or here.
After all, isn't 2+2 boring? Not to the new kids first exposed it is not.