Too bad there isn't a place they could be critically reviewed by knowledgeable people who don't have a particular agenda to advance.

Well, Davis had a critical review before publishing in a Journal.

However, the second one seems to just be a collection of broad generalizations in the form of absolute pronouncements which I don't find particularly helpful. All one needs to do is go over to AA and easily find someone who can shout just as loud in the opposite direction.


Yes, they can shout without evidence. Peter and Dr.David Rich, his technical person at TAC has been doing DBT from the day he saw the light. That is what converted him, not God.[/b]

At some point, God paid him a visit and he was magically transformed into his current objective manisfestation.

Actuall, it was sanity, reality that transformed him.

.

BTW, on the first article, as I understand it he did not test complex waveforms and possible distortion, including temporal distortion. Am I correct and do you think such tests should be performed?



You think wires will react to complex waveforms differently? I'd like to see the evidence for that. Same for temporal distortion that jneutron is so fond of. Skin effect delays some of the frequency arrival times, in the nano second timescale:
"Amplifier-Loudspeaker Interfacing", Greiner, R.A., JAES vol. 28, no. 5 May 80,
I think he is confusing the ability to spacially locate sound sources that require the same frequency to arrive at the left and right ear at different times and shift in the frequency itself in the same cable. Having two cables in the left and right channel would delay the frequency equally in each cable hence no time difference between the two channels, unless you have 1000s of feet of wire differencesin one channel. But, hey, I have no idea.

If you followed Steve Eddy's wire distortion reports and discussions, there is no measured distortion from wire. Signal complexity in the audio band will not change that.