Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 51 to 75 of 77

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Silence of the spam Site Moderator Geoffcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,326
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Peabody
    Actually, Geoff, every one here except for RGA who uses tubes has ultralinear.
    Yes, I figured it was by far the most popular, certainly it's the best bang for the buck.

    I have heard other topologies that I enjoy, like the Atma-Sphere OTL's. Probably the only amp that I would trade my current one in for ;

    http://www.atma-sphere.com/products/m60.html

    Remarkable design and execution.

    Of course if you have the cash and a really big air conditioner;

    Audio;
    Ming Da MC34-AB 75wpc
    PS Audio Classic 250. 500wpc into 4 ohms.
    PS Audio 4.5 preamp,
    Marantz 6170 TT Shure M97e cart.
    Arcam Alpha 9 CD.- 24 bit dCS Ring DAC.
    Magnepan 3.6r speakers Oak/black,

  2. #2
    Vinyl Fundamentalist Forums Moderator poppachubby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Analog Synagogue
    Posts
    4,363
    frenchmon, I think the scale thing is not working. I am saying that my SE40 is certainly less tubey than MacIntosh, if that gives you a barometer. With a 7/8, I was trying to convey that it ISN'T saturated so to speak.

  3. #3
    frenchmon frenchmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    St. Charles Mo
    Posts
    3,271
    Quote Originally Posted by poppachubby
    frenchmon, I think the scale thing is not working. I am saying that my SE40 is certainly less tubey than MacIntosh, if that gives you a barometer. With a 7/8, I was trying to convey that it ISN'T saturated so to speak.
    Oh ok. The Audio Research tubed preamp I listened to with a Mac tube amp was maybe a 4 on the scale...it was not saturated with coloration. But it was an older McIntosh...some say that has something to do with it....I don't know enough about them nor have I heard many Mac's to have an opinion.
    Music...let it into your soul and be moved....with Canton...Pure Music


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    W10 i5 Quad core processor 8GB RAM/Jriver 20/ Fidelizer Optimizer/ iFI Micro DSD DAC-iUSB 3.0/Vincent SA - T1/Vincent SP-331 MK /MMF-7.1/2M BLACK/MS Phenomena ll+/Canton Vento 830.2

  4. #4
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    Come on now, sometimes a BS word is necessary, it's very difficult to put sound into a description. As an example I remember discussing the Adcom gfa-5500 and Feanor used the word "earthy" to describe the sound. Earthy sounds pretty strange to describe sound but if you've heard the amp "earthy" really hit the nail on the head as the amp was dark with a unique signature that earthy came as close to anything I've heard to describe it.

  5. #5
    Silence of the spam Site Moderator Geoffcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,326
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Peabody
    Come on now, sometimes a BS word is necessary, it's very difficult to put sound into a description. As an example I remember discussing the Adcom gfa-5500 and Feanor used the word "earthy" to describe the sound. Earthy sounds pretty strange to describe sound but if you've heard the amp "earthy" really hit the nail on the head as the amp was dark with a unique signature that earthy came as close to anything I've heard to describe it.
    Here's the problem; "Earthy" may mean something totally different to different people. From the smell of a newly planted field, to the scent of a dirt floored cellar. Trying to stick to words that have as close to standard meanings in the context that they are used is the hallmark of good reviewing. These words like "holistic" and "earthy are so vague that you might as well be casting a horoscope rather than doing a review. Good reviewers ban words like that from their reviews.

    So, I'll have my SS glace' with a dollop of tube caramel please!
    Audio;
    Ming Da MC34-AB 75wpc
    PS Audio Classic 250. 500wpc into 4 ohms.
    PS Audio 4.5 preamp,
    Marantz 6170 TT Shure M97e cart.
    Arcam Alpha 9 CD.- 24 bit dCS Ring DAC.
    Magnepan 3.6r speakers Oak/black,

  6. #6
    RGA
    RGA is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,539
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoffcin
    Here's the problem; "Earthy" may mean something totally different to different people. From the smell of a newly planted field, to the scent of a dirt floored cellar. Trying to stick to words that have as close to standard meanings in the context that they are used is the hallmark of good reviewing. These words like "holistic" and "earthy are so vague that you might as well be casting a horoscope rather than doing a review. Good reviewers ban words like that from their reviews.

    So, I'll have my SS glace' with a dollop of tube caramel please!
    Yes but if you bothered to read the entire review you would get a good sense of the way he felt about both stereos. To focus on one word is the same as the morons who find one mistake in one minor point in a 5000 point theory and then discount the entire thing because they don't happen to like the stance taken as it doesn't fit with their own "lack of experience" but assumptions. Most people who get on that maker do so because if it is in fact true that they are "right" then that means a big chunk of their long time belief systems will crack. A lot of people who spend tens of thousands of dollars don't want to believe they threw their money away on comparative rubbish. That is why I give Kevin Credit. His belief was complete opposite - he trusted the measurements, he bought all the supposed "right" gear and yet he kept an open mind. Had some beat up less expensive gear delivered and it destroyed not only his mid-fi equipment masquerading as hi-fi but shattered all that he knew and accepted as the truth. Same gear did it to me.

    He used the word Holistic - relating to or concerned with wholes or with complete systems rather than with the analysis of, treatment of, or dissection into parts

    I have no problem with that term in audio. He is discussing Audio Note which is probably the only company in the industry (high end industry) that Truly looks at the "whole" (holistic) stereo system as one voice. Comparatively everyone else is building Frankenstein monsters that usually sound like Frankenstein looks. The word fits the company.

    Far too many stereo systems sound like they're dissecting the album (when in reality it is usually the stereo sounding discombobulated into isolated parts. A holistic system sounds complete, of a piece, real whole. Nothing at all wrong with that term. In fact if one complains about that terms it's more than likely they have never heard a system that sounds "real," "whole," and "complete." The alternate is isolated separate out of step systems. Sounds like SS to me.

  7. #7
    It's just a hobby
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    808
    Quote Originally Posted by RGA
    I have no problem with that term in audio. He is discussing Audio Note which is probably the only company in the industry (high end industry) that Truly looks at the "whole" (holistic) stereo system as one voice. Comparatively everyone else is building Frankenstein monsters that usually sound like Frankenstein looks. The word fits the company.
    Please do not to go down that route again....thank you
    Last edited by theaudiohobby; 08-06-2010 at 07:05 AM.
    It's a listening test, you do not need to see it to listen to it!

  8. #8
    RGA
    RGA is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,539
    Quote Originally Posted by theaudiohobby
    Please do not to go down that route again....thank you
    Digging up posts from 12 days ago - who is going down that route? Nice.



    Removed offensive content
    Last edited by JohnMichael; 08-06-2010 at 12:55 PM.

  9. #9
    AR Newbie Registered Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1
    Dear: Friends

    Sorry to my limited english, but to my years of in search of best sounding amps, there is none that I feel can represent the best in terms of everything.

    but, to me, if you'd want a full tube amp, that would be more of mid fluidity, more openess, and sweeter top end. depending on how you want your music to be..

    but hybrid academy such as the kw musical fidelity (kilowatt series) will also be great in terms of dinamic swings and liveliness.

    Of course one can not have all the benefits, but if you are looking for a stronger musical repro..go for the hybrid.. friend..

    Thanks..
    Jonathan
    Singapore

  10. #10
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    355
    Playing the same records (yes, that means vinyl), on my system after going to the California Audio Show, I am surprised how much more realistic my system is compared to even the $400,000 systems at the show. For me, this means that the music simply seems to be IN my room.

  11. #11
    Forum Regular Jack in Wilmington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,483
    Quote Originally Posted by tube fan
    Playing the same records (yes, that means vinyl), on my system after going to the California Audio Show, I am surprised how much more realistic my system is compared to even the $400,000 systems at the show. For me, this means that the music simply seems to be IN my room.
    You are a very lucky man. Most people go to audio shows and hear gear that sounds much better than they have in there own system. But you get what you can afford and upgrade when you can. Just getting into tubes myself, I feel I have opened up a whole new sound that I had not previously heard.

    Oh and tube fan, I wanted to tell you that when you mentioned the Albinoni LP that you had with you at the California show. I had never heard of it before and with your discription, I thought it was worth checking out. A couple days later I get a E-Mail ad from Elusive Disc and there is your LP second one down in the ad. Solid recommendation. Thanks
    2 Channel System
    Dynaudio Contour 1.8 Mk II
    Pass Labs X150.5 (Amp)
    Cary SLP-03 (Preamp)
    Music Hall MMF 5.1 (TT)
    Goldring 1012GX (Cart.)
    Pro-ject SE II (Phono Box)
    Rotel RCD-1072 (CD Player)
    Bryston BDA-1 ( DAC )
    Sennheiser HD-600 (Headphones)
    Musical Fidelity Xcan V3 (Headphone Amp) _

    HT System
    Usher X-719 (Mains)
    Usher X-616 (Center)
    Usher S-520 (Surrounds)
    Rel T2 (Subwoofer)
    Anthem MCA20 (Amp)
    Yamaha RX-A830 (Receiver)
    Panasonic TH-46PZ85U (Plasma TV)
    Denon DBT-1713UD (BluRay/SACD)

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •