Sounds like there's a consensus here - Sony hasn't exactly flooded the market with their brand of killer game titles.

My sense is that PS3 took a bit more than Sony hoped for just to develop, so the contingency plan was to keep servicing the PS2 and to offset any losses, while building and establishing the Sony brand until such a time that the PS3 is ready for an inexpensive mass production run supported by good titles.

Seriously, they knew MS had their asses licked for the first year - so why bother trying at all?
Think we're going to see the 360/PS3 war last a lot longer than the XBox/PS2 war did...as in, there could be a few extra years in this generation.

While we're on the topic...
Kex's mother in-law just bought him a shiny new Xbox 360 - originally I had last year's model but never opened it. Thank goodness for Futureshop's exchange policy - yesterday I swapped that model for the new bundle they just released that came with 2 extra games and a free version of Guitar Hero II...big reason I wanted the new console - HDMI.
(thanks to Beefy for answering all my 360 questions )
So the wife and I had a duel that Marty Friedman and Dave Mustaine would have been proud of last night

Now I'm off to buy 20 some feet of ethernet cable so I can take this baby LIVE...

Could a PS3 be in Kex's near future????