Results 1 to 6 of 6

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    Thanks yet again, Wooch. I got into a discussion about power ratings between the Yamaha RX-V1400 and RX-V2400 receivers (I'm a few paycheques away ). A friend of mine is considering purchasing the one of these two models. He doesn't really crank up the volume and I couldn't see much advantage for him to add 10 more watts per channel.
    What about putting a different spin on this question then. He's driving some DIY VIFA speakers (Ed Frias, I think) so would buying a receiver with 10 more Watts per channel improve sound quality at moderate volumes, or just give him more potential to to make noise, and not really add value for him? We've already established the other features the 2400 incorporates over the 1400 probably wouldn't be of use to him. Any input? Thx.

  2. #2
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659
    If I may interject, an additional 10 watts won't really provide an audiable difference, assuming the same speakers in both cases.

    To get a barely audiable increase of 3 decibles, you need to DOUBLE the power. To get roughly twice the precieved loudness, you must multiply the power TEN times. So, those additional 10 watts won't amount to a hill of beans here.

    For this to be a good move, there must be other niceties added to that receiver he needs other than those 10 additional watts

    If those additional 10 watts are his only reason for looking at this, then I wouldn't waste my money.

  3. #3
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    That echoes my sentiments about the two receivers. 100 extra dollars for a few extra watts doesn't seem worth it. His current receiver is only 85/channel I think and that's been more than sufficient for him.
    Thanks for the input.

  4. #4
    Forum Regular TinHere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    L.I., NY
    Posts
    288
    Quote Originally Posted by kexodusc
    That echoes my sentiments about the two receivers. 100 extra dollars for a few extra watts doesn't seem worth it. His current receiver is only 85/channel I think and that's been more than sufficient for him.
    Thanks for the input.
    The 2400 allows for the receiver to be hooked up to a PC via the RSC232 connection. This allows for different settings to be stored on the PC and transferred to the receiver with a program they call the "Yamaha Receiver Editor". This allows for multiple "sweet spots" to be uploaded to the receiver from the computer without having to rerun YPAO each time you want the change, or manually redo the settings.
    TinHere

    Enjoying a virtual life.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Question for EE's: modding mini-systems
    By Chuckd55 in forum Amps/Preamps
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-02-2003, 08:31 AM
  2. Receiver's volume indicators...what do they mean?
    By topspeed in forum Amps/Preamps
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-29-2003, 05:54 AM
  3. Moniter series vs Studio series
    By mikert456 in forum Speakers
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 11-21-2003, 11:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •