Quote Originally Posted by pixelthis
To translate, you are arguing that a INTERLACED format is better because its "progressive" but its not progressive at all!
And my 768 p set has about twice as much resolution as your "edtv", which probably at most puts out around 380 lines of resolution.
BUT whatever makes you happy...
After the usually back and forth I see the main issue was missed:

His Money
His Preference
His decision

And I think the bottom line was keeping the cost down.

I didn't see where he was stating that the EDTV was better than any other display, but that it will serve the propose he needed. Some time we need to take a step back and just read what is presented and stop adding our own 2-3 5 cents worth of what is better. So if I only have 5 dollars to buy a t-shirt, don't tell me how much better a 50 dollar dress shirt would be.

It would serve the person more if the comments would have been on which EDTV has a better track record or helping with further decision on the HT setup:

A good DVD to match with the EDTV to get the best picture possible

AVR that could control all function (switching)

What other display's that could been purchased at the same cost.

That just the way I saw the post from the start! maybe I forgot to look between the lines.