Quote Originally Posted by WmAx
Rarely, will I recommend something based specifically on it's 'sound' since this is a subjectie issue. I may argue actual accuracy in some limited cases(not to be confused with 'liking' the sound-two different subjects).... the original poster of this thread might appreciate the HD500, however bad it may sound too you? For example, I felt that the Grado SR-60 and SR-80 were pitiful excuses for headphones.... but.... that's just my opinion. Some people(you, for example) may very well enjoy the sound of the SR-60 headphones. Indeed, the SR-60 is claimed by many on audio boards to be a great headphone for the respective price. Who am I to argue? I will note that I can not remember a positive comment concerning the HD-500 from anyone. My main reason for replying was that I could not find anything else to reply too....:-)

-Chris
Indeed assessing sound is very subjective, but in the case of the HD500, it's one of the few products from a reputable company I've heard that I will honestly say is truly bad. Some people might appreciate it for its emphasis in the bass, especially since the HD500 was designed for hip-hop and bass-heavy rock and electric jazz. But, given that it audibly distorts at even moderate levels with hip-hop, it doesn't even properly do what it was designed for. I'm not one to make blanket recommendations (just check my previous posts, you'll see that most of the time I tell people to do their own listenings and decide for themselves), but there are times that you have to call a spade a spade.

But, if anyone wants to check out the HD500s for themselves, I certainly won't discourage that. Who knows, if you think the SR60s and 80s are as bad as you say they are, then the HD500 might be more to your liking. Very different type of sound, but one that I can't justify, especially for $90.