Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5
Results 101 to 122 of 122
  1. #101
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Rikki
    no

    (small problem with your instructions, responses must be at least 5 characters on this site )
    It's amazing how much misspelled ink mtry spent answering this question. While my experience is different, I applaud appreciate your concise alacrity.

    rw

  2. #102
    Forum Regular Rikki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    59
    Update:
    I have some new equipment and re-did the test. My conclusion still holds true. Wire is Wire...
    Quote Originally Posted by Rikki View Post
    I’ve concluded that high end cables/speaker wire are a waste of money and does not significantly improve the sound of your system. As long as your wire has a “solid connection” meaning the wire is not broken or have crimps in it, 10 cent per foot speaker wire performs just as well as $10+ per foot wire.
    I now have a Rotel RSP-1069 pre-processor and Rotel RMB-1075 5 channel amp. I've had them for several years. I took my time with the test. The Rotel equipment was a big upgrade over the Yamaha $700 receiver that I originally had and did significantly improve my sound. So yes, money spent on upgrading components is well worth it. I still have the same set of Klipsch RF-7 speakers - I still love the sound of them - especially for the price.

    I tried the same test I did at the beginning of this thread. Hooked up the Monster Z1 cables that I have to the mains. I then (over several months at different times) swapped out the Monster cable with some cheap radio shack wire 16 gauge wire from a spool (cut to same length as the monster cable - 10ft). Guess what NO DIFFERENCE in sound quality.

    Many of you may have much more expensive components than I do - that's fine - the same test would still hold true. Expensive wire will not improve your system. Go ahead and try it for yourself if you want to waste time/money. On second thought, please spend your money on components not wire to improve your system. I'm begging you.

    P.S. The same also holds true with HDMI cable. Don't spend hundreds of dollars on cables. I'm trying to save you guys some money in these tough times.

  3. #103
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Rikki View Post
    Many of you may have much more expensive components than I do - that's fine - the same test would still hold true.
    It's certainly true that comparing one flavor of zip cord to another would indeed yield similar results. Hopefully, that didn't take you eight years to ascertain!

    Quote Originally Posted by Rikki View Post
    Expensive wire will not improve your system.
    So what other cables have you auditioned and in what systems?

  4. #104
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    Rikki did not lose our number. Has your hearing remained the same over 8 years? Have your ever tried solid core or a higher quality stranded cable? I find your number and types of cables used limiting.

    Welcome back!
    Last edited by JohnMichael; 04-11-2012 at 04:29 PM.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  5. #105
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Home Of The Fighting Gamecocks
    Posts
    1,702
    Are there double blind studies to support the advantages of expensive wires?

  6. #106
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Poultrygeist View Post
    Are there double blind studies to support the advantages of expensive wires?
    According to mtry's vast references, only with mediocre cable and of course with a box that necessarily shares a common ground (to eliminate switching transients) which completely negates the test.

    You end up comparing both cables to - both cables.

    Parlor games are fine for some things. I'll use my senses instead.

  7. #107
    Forum Regular Rikki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    59
    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat View Post
    It's certainly true that comparing one flavor of zip cord to another would indeed yield similar results. Hopefully, that didn't take you eight years to ascertain!


    So what other cables have you auditioned and in what systems?
    What reminded me of this thread - I was at a high end stereo shop last weekend and the guy was trying to sell me a bunch of Esoteric speaker cables. I told him I wanted to hook my cheap wire up to his best system and hear the difference vs. the Esoteric wires. The salesman was unwilling to try this test. Why ? Because it would reveal the scam. Marketing people invented expensive wire not engineers.

    The only thing that's changed in the 8 years since the original post is the advent of HDMI cables to handle both video and sound. That's actually been a great idea and a great technological advancement in cables. However, $100 HDMI cable works exactly the same as $10 HDMI cable. Same exact thin wire inside both products. Different HDMI specs 1.2 vs. 1.4 etc. can carry different info - so that could make a difference - but the sound and picture quality from any given 1.2 cable will always equal that of any other 1.2 cable.

    Quote Originally Posted by Poultrygeist View Post
    Are there double blind studies to support the advantages of expensive wires?
    I have never seen any. If I win the lottery, I will fly everyone on this forum to a neutral site and we can do some blind tests. Or since we're there we could just hang out, forget the cable tests, and enjoy the music since I am positive I am right.

    P.S. When they cost hundreds of dollars they like to refer to it as "cable" not "wire". How dare you!

  8. #108
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Rikki View Post
    I told him I wanted to hook my cheap wire up to his best system and hear the difference vs. the Esoteric wires. The salesman was unwilling to try this test.
    Good dealers will allow you to audition cables in your own system. That's how I've ended up with most of my cabling. With some Blue Jeans cable and Belden 89259 I terminated myself, I didn't bother auditioning first.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rikki View Post
    However, $100 HDMI cable works exactly the same as $10 HDMI cable. Same exact thin wire inside both products. Different HDMI specs 1.2 vs. 1.4 etc. can carry different info - so that could make a difference - but the sound and picture quality from any given 1.2 cable will always equal that of any other 1.2 cable.
    Different animal altogether. Since this is a basically a network cable delivering data packets, I largely agree.

    There is no potential for the time smearing experienced using high effective dielectric constant audio cabling. Shielding against RFI continues to make a difference, however, with any kind of cable to prevent interaction with surrounding components.
    Last edited by E-Stat; 04-12-2012 at 06:45 AM.

  9. #109
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Rikki View Post
    What reminded me of this thread - I was at a high end stereo shop last weekend and the guy was trying to sell me a bunch of Esoteric speaker cables. I told him I wanted to hook my cheap wire up to his best system and hear the difference vs. the Esoteric wires. The salesman was unwilling to try this test. Why ? Because it would reveal the scam. Marketing people invented expensive wire not engineers.


    P.S. When they cost hundreds of dollars they like to refer to it as "cable" not "wire". How dare you!


    I have spent a lot of time finding the best combination of IC's and speaker cables for the most accurate sound to my ears. I am sure the dealer went to as much trouble with his state of the art system. Once you have achieved the best level of sound for your demonstration gear I can imagine why he would not welcome unfamiliar cable.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  10. #110
    Forum Regular Florian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,959
    Hi Rikki,

    if you are ever in the area of southern Germany or Switzerland i will gladly show you the difference with a double blind listening test using either of the two systems:

    System 1:

    Apogee Acoustics Scintilla
    Lamm 2.1 Monoblocks
    Silvaweld Reference Preamp

    Two cables for our testing are the Magnan Reference Speaker Cables and the Alphacore Goertz Ribbon

    System 2:

    Apogee Acoustics Grand
    CAT SL1
    CAT JL 2
    NAT SE2SE
    Monarchy NM24
    Monarchy DIP

    We can do the testing using analog or digital. With blinded eyes or open, it won't matter. 4 out of 4 people hear the difference clearly. Unfortunately, my Magnan cable lost.... but not by much.
    Lots of music but not enough time for it all

  11. #111
    frenchmon frenchmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    St. Charles Mo
    Posts
    3,271
    Florian....can I get that same test if I am in your area? But I believe there is a difference....I just want to listen to your system
    Music...let it into your soul and be moved....with Canton...Pure Music


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    W10 i5 Quad core processor 8GB RAM/Jriver 20/ Fidelizer Optimizer/ iFI Micro DSD DAC-iUSB 3.0/Vincent SA - T1/Vincent SP-331 MK /MMF-7.1/2M BLACK/MS Phenomena ll+/Canton Vento 830.2

  12. #112
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659

    Question Sheesh!

    How lame is this forum that one has to go back and re-open a thread that's been dead and buried for over eight years?

    Nothing new to say?

  13. #113
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    Quote Originally Posted by markw View Post
    How lame is this forum that one has to go back and re-open a thread that's been dead and buried for over eight years?

    Nothing new to say?

    The OP thought he had gained some new insights.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  14. #114
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659

    Perhaps.

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnMichael View Post
    The OP thought he had gained some new insights.
    But that was over eight years ago. I've got grandkids that have been born and started school in that time.

  15. #115
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    Quote Originally Posted by markw View Post
    But that was over eight years ago. I've got grandkids that have been born and started school in that time.


    Yes after 8 years he bought some new equipment and used the same old wires for the same failed conclusion.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  16. #116
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659

    Some things never change.

    Well, OP gave it a considred try and still came to the same conclusion. What more can be said?

    I'd say eight years is a pretty good try, wouldn't you?

  17. #117
    RGA
    RGA is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,539
    Cable debates. Geez.

    Every place I've ever been to will let you take the cables home first. Even the big box chains like Best Buy and Future shop have 100% no questions asked return policies of either 14 days or 30 days on cables. Try them - perform DBTs and then return them if you don't like them or think they do anything.

    Cables are glorified tone controls - what one cable does in one system may do ZILCH in another and I've used the cable logic fault numerous times.

    You have a stereo system that has a turntable, CD transport, DAC, Preamplifier, Power amplifier, Loudspeakers. All form different manufacturers.

    Turntable has internal wiring (called A) and let's be generous and assume the Interconnect out to the preamp is the same.

    CD transport has internal wiring B

    DAC has internal wiring C

    Preamp has internal wiring D

    Power amp has internal wiring E

    Loudspeakers have internal wiring F

    This system has 6 different cables (which in theory all sound different than each other)

    Most audiophiles don't seem to use exactly the same interconnects and speaker wires - so let's split the difference and say they use the same Interconnects throughout (cables G) but different speaker wires (cable H)

    Now we're up to 8 different sounding wires.

    [As an aside this doesn't even begin to mention the mass number of audiophiles who mix and match components like tube preamps with SS power amps from designers who think the other design is wrong and these audiophiles are basically trying to press two opposed magnets together. Ie - wildly opposed "voices"]

    To me two results come from this laughable mess of cables.

    1) all the bloody different wires cause a reduction to the weakest link. I don't see how an expensive IC is going to fix the 3 cent per meter cheap junk wiring inside the amplifier or CD player. And 99% of all mainstream stuff uses the cheapest ass wiring that is humanly possible to use - so of course people have trouble telling ICs or speaker cables apart - assuming their was some greatness to be had in an expensive speaker cable once it hits the pennies a ton wiring inside most loudspeakers that "goodness" has become irrevocably sullied.

    2) Even if all the components in the systems use high quality cables it still has 6-8 competing voicing vying to come through to the listener. Which reduces ALL cables to mere tone controls often at ludicrously expensive price points. The MIT cable that sounds better in one guys discombobulated 8 wire system may sound utterly dreadful in someone else's discombobulated 8 wire system. Then it becomes a bit of marketing and brand hype. The big fat speaker wire looks cool and carries a hefty price tag but if the components are using cheap dredge then I scratch the old noggin.

    Some speaker makers are selling their own speaker cable cables like Zu presumably with their own wires inside their speakers and you can buy the exact same speaker cable and interconnect cable. Logically that makes a lot of sense.

    Audio Note is the only company I am aware of where you can buy a complete stereo and pretty much get the exact same wiring from cartrdige to speaker voice coil right down tot he soldering material and even the transformer windings.

    So you get 99.99% Silver Litz inside the amplifiers Cd players, turntables, cartridge wiring, to transformer windings, to outboard crossovers on the speakers hardwired right into the speaker voice coil which is also wound with the wiring and the soldering material is also 99.99% Litz and the very capacitors throughout the chain are made of silver as well as ALL connectors on all components are also silver and power chords are also 99.99% silver Litz.

    The 6-8 cables(not to mention soldering materials, caps, connectors (gold plated???) and the whole weakest link factor and glorified tone control is now 1 cable made of the exact same purity and sonic purity throughout - there is no tone control.

    And as great as that all is - in order to do it means you have to buy a system from them - and not just any system but one of those 6 figure jobs starting with at least a 3. eesh.

    So play with the cables and buy or not but with the whole mix and match aspect of most systems you can't say much about their transferability across systems.

  18. #118
    Suspended Smokey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Ozarks
    Posts
    3,959
    Quote Originally Posted by RGA View Post
    Cable debates. Geez.

    Every place I've ever been to will let you take the cables home first. Even the big box chains like Best Buy and Future shop have 100% no questions asked return policies of either 14 days or 30 days on cables. Try them - perform DBTs and then return them if you don't like them or think they do anything.

    Cables are glorified tone controls - what one cable does in one system may do ZILCH in another and I've used the cable logic fault numerous times.

    You have a stereo system that has a turntable, CD transport, DAC, Preamplifier, Power amplifier, Loudspeakers. All form different manufacturers.

    Turntable has internal wiring (called A) and let's be generous and assume the Interconnect out to the preamp is the same.

    CD transport has internal wiring B

    DAC has internal wiring C

    Preamp has internal wiring D

    Power amp has internal wiring E

    Loudspeakers have internal wiring F

    This system has 6 different cables (which in theory all sound different than each other)

    Most audiophiles don't seem to use exactly the same interconnects and speaker wires - so let's split the difference and say they use the same Interconnects throughout (cables G) but different speaker wires (cable H)

    Now we're up to 8 different sounding wires.

    [As an aside this doesn't even begin to mention the mass number of audiophiles who mix and match components like tube preamps with SS power amps from designers who think the other design is wrong and these audiophiles are basically trying to press two opposed magnets together. Ie - wildly opposed "voices"]

    To me two results come from this laughable mess of cables.

    1) all the bloody different wires cause a reduction to the weakest link. I don't see how an expensive IC is going to fix the 3 cent per meter cheap junk wiring inside the amplifier or CD player. And 99% of all mainstream stuff uses the cheapest ass wiring that is humanly possible to use - so of course people have trouble telling ICs or speaker cables apart - assuming their was some greatness to be had in an expensive speaker cable once it hits the pennies a ton wiring inside most loudspeakers that "goodness" has become irrevocably sullied.

    2) Even if all the components in the systems use high quality cables it still has 6-8 competing voicing vying to come through to the listener. Which reduces ALL cables to mere tone controls often at ludicrously expensive price points. The MIT cable that sounds better in one guys discombobulated 8 wire system may sound utterly dreadful in someone else's discombobulated 8 wire system. Then it becomes a bit of marketing and brand hype. The big fat speaker wire looks cool and carries a hefty price tag but if the components are using cheap dredge then I scratch the old noggin.
    This is a good analysis, and sadly at the same time highlight the slipery-slope and ugly side of cables having "sound" argument
    Last edited by Smokey; 07-02-2012 at 03:05 AM.

  19. #119
    Forum Regular blackraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,421
    Florian, which Alpha Core cables do you have?
    Pass Labs X250 amp, BAT Vk-51se Preamp,
    Thorens TD-145 TT, Bellari phono preamp, Nagaoka MP-200 Cartridge
    Magnepan QR1.6 speakers
    Luxman DA-06 DAC
    Van Alstine Ultra Plus Hybrid Tube DAC
    Dual Martin Logan Original Dynamo Subs
    Parasound A21 amp
    Vintage Luxman T-110 tuner
    Magnepan MMG's, Grant Fidelity DAC-11, Class D CDA254 amp
    Monitor Audio S1 speakers, PSB B6 speakers
    Vintage Technic's Integrated amp
    Music Hall 25.2 CDP
    Adcom GFR 700 AVR
    Cables- Cardas, Silnote, BJC
    Velodyne CHT 8 sub

  20. #120
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Home Of The Fighting Gamecocks
    Posts
    1,702
    Here are some interesting sound improvement techniques. Anyone tried freezing their cables?

    Free sound improving techniques

  21. #121
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    Quote Originally Posted by blackraven View Post
    Florian, which Alpha Core cables do you have?

    This reminds me I have not used my Alpha Core MI1 with my Krell S-300i. I was thinking about buying some MI2 because I read the highs are better. Of course both my speakers are bi-wire so I will need to check the cost. The MI1 had great bass and midrange with a dark top end but loved the midrange.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  22. #122
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    I hooked up the AlphaCore speaker cables last night. I had last used them with the Onkyo A-9555 Class D and they were not a good match. They sing with the Krell. I had forgotten how good they are. Everything was sounding so good that I listened to music until 2:30 AM sadly I was up at 5:30 AM.

    I was so impressed that I ordered a bi-wire pair. I ordered the shotgunned pair of MI1. The cables will have single pair of banana plugs at the amp end and double pairs at the speaker ends. While I was online I ordered a new pair of Micropurl IC's.

    As good as the AlphaCore cables sound I look forward to the bi-wire pair and having the metal jumpers removed. Thanks Florian and blackraven for rekindling my interest in AlphaCore cables.
    Last edited by JohnMichael; 07-07-2012 at 05:20 AM.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. speaker cables vs speaker wire
    By muzicman20003 in forum Cables
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-08-2004, 04:56 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-15-2004, 10:21 PM
  3. bi wire
    By cjg321 in forum Cables
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-04-2004, 10:32 PM
  4. expensive cables
    By sofsoldier in forum Cables
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 12-22-2003, 07:15 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-05-2003, 01:46 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •