Results 1 to 25 of 135

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
    At least that you are aware of. There are dozens of speakers and amplfiers that support biwiring. Before you counter with "they just do that to placate stupid audiophiles", I suggest you actually talk to one of their designers so that you may understand the engineering reason(s).rw
    The designers will not have correct engineering reasons. None of them ever do. Talking with them will be useless.

    That doesn't mean biwiring is incorrect, just that they do not understand.

    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
    As for me, I am neutral on the topic because I use full range electrostats.
    rw
    Perhaps you should add some rear firing tweeters to bring those "(darn, can't remember what the word was..insert something witty here)" panels up to bare minimal audiophile standards..

    How's it going? Just figured I'd drop in and add some negativity..

    Cheers, John

  2. #2
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by jneutron
    The designers will not have correct engineering reasons. None of them ever do. Talking with them will be useless.
    Omniscient, are we?

    Quote Originally Posted by jneutron
    Perhaps you should add some rear firing tweeters to bring those "(darn, can't remember what the word was..insert something witty here)" panels up to bare minimal audiophile standards..
    Skeptic/Soundmind's attempted derogatory term is "dressing screens".

    Quote Originally Posted by jneutron
    How's it going? Just figured I'd drop in and add some negativity..
    Aside from some rain, things are doing well here in AR. Negativity? I rather appreciate it when knowledgeable folks correct the simple conclusions made by armchair audio engineers.

    rw

  3. #3
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
    Omniscient, are we?
    rw
    Don't know..gotta look that up. It certainly isn't in my copy of Jackson.

    Edit: ah, I realized a better word than Omniscient.. Historian. As in, so far, to date, I've not seen an explanation which holds water. Those who explain why it does either misconstrue existing concepts, extend out hearing ability far beyond reasonable, or make stuff up as they go along. Reasons why it can't work have not historically hit the target either..

    So, no, not Omniscient. (end of edit)

    I can't believe nobody's followed up on the dissipation angle, it's just so darn simple. Sheesh, I posted it what, two years ago?
    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
    Skeptic/Soundmind's attempted derogatory term is "dressing screens". rw
    Ah yes, dressing screens..well, they probably still need rear firing tweets.. Take it from me...my coffee cup has rear firing tweets, and the coffee tastes so much better..

    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
    Aside from some rain, things are doing well here in AR. Negativity? I rather appreciate it when knowledgeable folks correct the simple conclusions made by armchair audio engineers. rw
    When I find someone who is knowledgeable, I'll send them here..till then, all ya gots is me..I post in between sweeping the floors and cleaning the bowls..

    Cheers, John
    Last edited by jneutron; 11-15-2006 at 09:12 AM.

  4. #4
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by jneutron
    Ah yes, dressing screens..well, they probably still need rear firing tweets..
    My big a$$ dipoles have thirty square feet of 'em!

    While "rear firing tweeters" was the title of the post, what really floats SM's boat is spraying HF at the ceiling using three tweets crossed over at 6 khz. Yes, you heard me correctly.

    rw

  5. #5
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
    My big a$$ dipoles have thirty square feet of 'em!

    While "rear firing tweeters" was the title of the post, what really floats SM's boat is spraying HF at the ceiling using three tweets crossed over at 6 khz. Yes, you heard me correctly.

    rw
    Ah. Honestly, when I see both of your monikers, I have little desire to delve into the sub thread...again, a historical consideration, nothing more..

    Cheers, John

  6. #6
    Forum Regular FLZapped's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    740

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by jneutron
    The designers will not have correct engineering reasons. None of them ever do. Talking with them will be useless.

    That doesn't mean biwiring is incorrect, just that they do not understand.

    Cheers, John
    Probably because it is driven by the marketing department, not the Engineering department......

    Happy Thanksgiving, John.

    -Bruce

  7. #7
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by FLZapped
    Probably because it is driven by the marketing department, not the Engineering department......

    Happy Thanksgiving, John.

    -Bruce
    Hey there Bruce, long time no talk..Happy thanksgiving to you.

    How are you doing? Hope all is well.

    I'zis just doin fantastic...still wakin up on the right side of the ground.. Gettin ready ta make the old woodwork shop so'z I can get to the spkr projects.

    Course, my time here may be limited...after all, I'zis violatin rule #4..

    Dat be:

    Please restrict discussion of DBT, ABX and lab measurements to the "The Science Lab"


    Oh well..what iz.....iz..I'ziz livin at the discretion of a moderator, I guess..

    Cheers, John

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •