Results 1 to 25 of 81

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Silence of the spam Site Moderator Geoffcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,326

    To be honest

    Quote Originally Posted by topspeed
    Hey Geoff,

    You know, I'm actually not slamming them. I shipped it UPS ground and it had to go all the way from Cali to NY so that alone probably chewed up 5 days or so. Mike at AudioPlus warned me before I shipped it that it was vacation time so it would take a bit longer. Well, the boy wasn't lyin'. As of yesterday, they said they were scheduled to look at it in the next few days. Hopefully, I'll have it up and running in another week or so. I'll let you guys know.

    Man, I never realized how horrible my computer speakers were until this happened
    I think they are screwing you around already. If your dealer confermed that the unit was faultly, then the manufacturer should have authorized an immidiate replacment. If it's going to take another few weeks to get this sorted then they've really dropped the ball IMHO.
    Audio;
    Ming Da MC34-AB 75wpc
    PS Audio Classic 250. 500wpc into 4 ohms.
    PS Audio 4.5 preamp,
    Marantz 6170 TT Shure M97e cart.
    Arcam Alpha 9 CD.- 24 bit dCS Ring DAC.
    Magnepan 3.6r speakers Oak/black,

  2. #2
    Suspended topspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,717
    Yeah, you're probably right. I guess because it's only used for my office rig, I just don't care that much. Most of the time I'm not even paying attention to the music anyway. Besides, Lord knows I've got bigger issues to deal with than a faulty amp.

  3. #3
    Forum Regular Uptown Audio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    10
    We sell both Cambridge Audio and NAD products here. In response to the original poster's question, I find that his choice of amplifier was on the weak side. The Cambridge amps are fine, but they are not the last word in brute power, especially the smaller of the two. The small NAD amp, the C320BEE, has a nice, warm sound while still resolving details so it would have been a better choice at that level. For your particular speakers (another sore point IMO) I find that the NAD C352 would be the best choice. It is reasonably priced and is the best sounding of their integrated amplifiers, even the larger C372, IMO. It sounds like some of you have not had satisfactory experiences by choosing to buy products via mail, based upon review rather than to buy them locally after actually hearing them. The personal service and experience of buying from a competent local dealer would be well worth the "trouble" or "cost" considering what many of you have been through by avoiding it or simply "missing" it.
    -Bill

    www.uptownaudio.com
    Salem VA
    (540) 387-5050

  4. #4
    Big science. Hallelujah. noddin0ff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    X
    Posts
    2,286
    Bill-

    It would be a wonderful thing if everyone had access to a 'local' dealer that carried all makes and models. Mail order, however, is what many need to rely on to purchase components they desire, which is why forums and reviews are so important. I'm curious to know how you found the 320BEE and the 540A to compare. Frankly, I'm not interested in brute power. I'm more concerned with how the amps compare at low volumes. This seems to me to be a more demanding criteria. You say the BEE has a 'nice warm sound while still resolving details." That is pretty much exactly how I'd describe the 540A. You can read my review here at
    http://www.audioreview.com/Integrate...7_2717crx.aspx

    A lot of posters in this thread (and other threads) have described the sound of each component but few have been able to set up a blind A/B comparison with similar sources and speakers. It would be good to hear a complete informed review of how they compare. If you do post one, I would think it deserved a new thread since many have asked for this comparison.

    noddin0ff

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Arcam vs. Rotel vs. Cambridge Audio
    By Arch in forum Digital Domain & Computer Audio
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 04-02-2006, 08:18 AM
  2. Cambridge Azur 640C Bug
    By RobertKruz in forum General Audio
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-07-2005, 09:32 AM
  3. cambridge audio azur 540d
    By musicman1999 in forum Home Theater/Video
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-30-2004, 06:58 AM
  4. Cambridge Audio Azur questions
    By OP-OS in forum Amps/Preamps
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-08-2004, 07:39 AM
  5. Arcam CD62T vs Cambridge Audio Azur 540C
    By xforce in forum Digital Domain & Computer Audio
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-28-2004, 08:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •