View Poll Results: Sub, or no sub?

Voters
32. You may not vote on this poll
  • Subs are for people who just don't get what high end sound is about.

    1 3.13%
  • Sats and subs are where it's at.

    2 6.25%
  • Full range towers with a sub is the best of both.

    14 43.75%
  • I have a sub now but would switch to full range only if I had the $$.

    2 6.25%
  • Other. Please specify.

    13 40.63%
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 54
  1. #1
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243

    To sub, or not to sub. That is the question.

    I know that many feel that a powered sub is like the kiss of death for stereo music. Others feel that you get more for your money with satellite speakers and a sub. Still others feel that good full range (or close to full range) towers with a good sub to supplement the very low lows is the best way to go. Which way do you do it and why? Would you change your method if price was no object?
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  2. #2
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Out there
    Posts
    6,777
    Choice #C because that's what I've got and probably all I'll ever have.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307

    To sub, or not to sub: That is the question:

    Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.


    I owned a sub once and almost went nuts trying to integrate it into the system and room. If I had a larger listening room I would go for fullrange speakers and not bother with a sub.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  4. #4
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    I would like to have a good set of full range speakers with a sub crossed at about 40 htz. The towers I have now do not go low enough for that. I have them crossed at 80. If I had enough cash, I'd get full rangers with amps to drive them. But I'd never give up my sub for movies.
    Right now, I'm still looking at the mini's (who have their own bult in subs). I would use my pure direct setting on the receiver for music there by cutting out the main sub. Then switch back to DTS for movies.

    Oh, and Tex, "C" is not a number.
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  5. #5
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    I have a set of full range multi woofer towers that sound pretty good down into the low 30's, high 20's range. They use 2 vifa wood-fiber woofers and a nice Scan-Speak tweeter. They sound even better with a good, properly implemented subwoofer.
    It's a bit of a paint to figure out how to integrate them well (ie, what frequency), but my sub has a 4th order low pass filter which greatly simplifies things. A lot of subs only have 2nd order filters unfortunately. This system is connected to my integrated, so I can't use my receiver's digital LFE crossover. Subs are much easier to incorporate with those!
    A few years ago I tried matching my subwoofer - then a Paradigm PW-2200.
    This wasn't a good move. The Paradigm was powerful, played loud, low and shook the house, but it had a hard time sounding as good as my speakers for music, seemed a bit sloppy, and didn't really do so well in my small studio/room. It's a ported design, and isn't really tailored made for this application, to be fair. It had a 2nd order filter on it too (which I believe has since been upgraded to a 3rd order, still not enough IMO).

    Fast forward a few years, my current sub(s) are 15" sealed models, and are much better suited for this application. Tighter, better transient response, none of the exaggerated boom that ported subs often have. It's just a totally different experience. On the flipside, they may not have as much SPL or hit 15 Hz like a ported 15" model but that's okay.

    Right now I'm experimenting with dual subs in my home theater, so it's out of my stereo system for the time being. It seems like such a small range of frequencies, but it sure added a great deal of realism to the music experience. I don't miss it so much with rock music as much as classical and jazz...or anything with big ol' acoustic bass.

    In my home theater, my subwoofer also improves the performance of my bookshelf speakers, just by removing the "burden" of bass duty. I noticed greater clarity and resolution in the midrange in particular. SACD wouldn't be the same without it.

    A few years ago I was pretty much of the mind that subs had no place in 2 channel systems, only home theater. I think slowly the industry is opening its mind to the possibilities and subwoofers continue to be made better, and cheaper.

  6. #6
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    I was hoping for a bigger turn out. Maybe some will be along later.


    Hello? Is this thing on?
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  7. #7
    _ Luvin Da Blues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    _
    Posts
    1,951
    Quote Originally Posted by GMichael
    Oh, and Tex, "C" is not a number.

    Not much gets by you GM!

    I have my towers Xover'd at 60Hz to dual subs. Dunno but sounds good to my tin hearin' organs.
    Back in my day, we had nine planets.

  8. #8
    _ Luvin Da Blues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    _
    Posts
    1,951
    Quote Originally Posted by kexodusc
    Right now I'm experimenting with dual subs in my home theater, so it's out of my stereo system for the time being. It seems like such a small range of frequencies, but it sure added a great deal of realism to the music experience. I don't miss it so much with rock music as much as classical and jazz...or anything with big ol' acoustic bass.
    I know what you mean. After spending at least 5 minutes(, hours upon hours) with the meter and tone CD, I'll put on some tunes with a nicely recorded standup bass that I know real well and just run the subs alone to fine tune the placement and play with the xover until it's as smooth as I can get it. Then I go back to all speakers and fine tune even more. I think by running 2 ported subs you can minimize the "chuffing" of the ports.

    But WTF do I know... I do know what sounds good to me.
    Back in my day, we had nine planets.

  9. #9
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by GMichael
    I know that many feel that a powered sub is like the kiss of death for stereo music. Others feel that you get more for your money with satellite speakers and a sub. Still others feel that good full range (or close to full range) towers with a good sub to supplement the very low lows is the best way to go.
    Depends. Ideally, I favor full range designs for their superb coherency. The wave emanates from a single pebble in the pond. Questions of matching driver radiation patterns, range, distortion, etc. simply do not apply. I get flat response down to 25 hz with the stats which is good enough for me (I'm not a pipe organ freak - but do enjoy the "feel" of a genuine 32 foot pedal note). In my dreams, I would have a far larger room using four Pro-Stat 945s driven with a couple of kilowatts of tube power.

    From a practical standpoint, however, I enjoy dual powered subs supplementing the satellites in the HT. The reason is that I can apply EQ to the subs without compromising the full range signal. As with any matching, it took many hours to get an optimum combination of sub level, high and low pass crossover frequencies, and EQ settings to flatten out the system response.

    rw

  10. #10
    I took a headstart... basite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mortsel, Antwerp, Belgium, Europe, Earth
    Posts
    3,056
    no sub here, if I get a bigger room then a sub will be in consideration, but I think I need a pretty big one though...
    Life is music!

    Mcintosh MA6400 Integrated
    Double Advent speakers
    Thiel CS2.3's
    *DIY Lenco L75 TT
    * SME 3012 S2
    * Rega RB-301
    *Denon DL-103 in midas body
    *Denon DL-304
    *Graham slee elevator EXP & revelation
    *Lehmann audio black cube SE
    Marantz CD5001 OSE
    MIT AVt 2 IC's
    Sonic link Black earth IC's
    Siltech MXT New york IC's
    Kimber 4VS speakercable
    Furutech powercord and plugs.

    I'm a happy 20 year old...

  11. #11
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    Posts
    494

    Sure... but it depends!

    At this point, I subscribe the the REL philosophy - i.e., a low x-over point to only come up and meet the mains. My cut-off is 41 cycles, and I feel it blends beautifully.

    To deny oneself that extra foundation simply because it isn't "purist audiophile approved" is silly, IMO. A judiciously implemented sub can expand the soundstage as well. C'Mon... you NEED bass to complete the aural picture.

    A few things...

    1) I have heard the Reference 3A de Capos with a Hsu sub - not sure if it was set-up or the sub itself, but I preferred the Refs alone. Point is, a subwoofer can sometimes do more damage than good. IMO, of course.

    2) Obviously, if you're running full-range mains, you don't NEED the extra extention! My guess would be speakers that are flat to 30 or so.

    Sometimes my Strata is indeed a bit redundant, but more often than not, she feels good!

  12. #12
    Forum Regular pixelthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    tuscaloosa
    Posts
    5,528
    Quote Originally Posted by GMichael
    I was hoping for a bigger turn out. Maybe some will be along later.


    Hello? Is this thing on?
    Thats what my girlfriend keeps asking me.
    Truth is the ONLY reason I have a sub is for HT, HAVTA have a sub to properly
    blow crap up and piss off the neighbors.
    My receiver has a "pure" mode that is just two channel with the front display turned off.
    Best of both worlds, truckboy, best of both worlds.
    But if I ever am able to afford A audio only system it will be strictly two
    "big ol speakers"
    LG 42", integra 6.9, B&W 602s2, CC6 center, dm305rears, b&w
    sub asw2500
    Panny DVDA player
    sharp Aquos BLU player
    pronto remote, technics antique direct drive TT
    Samsung SACD/DVDA player
    emotiva upa-2 two channel amp

  13. #13
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    Quote Originally Posted by pixelthis
    Thats what my girlfriend keeps asking me.
    Truth is the ONLY reason I have a sub is for HT, HAVTA have a sub to properly
    blow crap up and piss off the neighbors.
    My receiver has a "pure" mode that is just two channel with the front display turned off.
    Best of both worlds, truckboy, best of both worlds.
    But if I ever am able to afford A audio only system it will be strictly two
    "big ol speakers"
    So you're saying, "I have a sub now but would switch to full range only if I had the $$."?
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  14. #14
    Forum Regular DEVO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    89
    Two subs is the perfect setup! BALANCE...
    Whether it's a stereo or multichannel system...
    However, placement is the most difficult part of this equation! And it may take months or longer to find this location.
    If you have the patience, and the equipment...this is the way to go.
    Just my two cents worth...

  15. #15
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    Quote Originally Posted by DEVO
    Two subs is the perfect setup! BALANCE...
    Whether it's a stereo or multichannel system...
    However, placement is the most difficult part of this equation! And it may take months or longer to find this location.
    If you have the patience, and the equipment...this is the way to go.
    Just my two cents worth...
    How about 3?

    One in each tower for stereo, and a third for HT.
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  16. #16
    Forum Regular Woochifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    6,883
    I'm with Kex on the subs.

    IMO, the primary improvement that a sub offers is the versatility of placing the sub where the low frequency response is more optimal, and the option of independently EQing the subwoofer to address any room-induced issues in the lows. Coupled with relieving the main speakers from having to reproduce the extreme lows, I found that using subwoofers can audibly improve the midrange coherency and create a smoother and fuller sounding bass (not just lower extension).

    Subs definitely represent a fair share of tradeoffs -- the placement/integration issues that JohnMichael cited will linger somewhat even in a good setup, and any kind of digital parametric EQing will add delay (not an issue if the processor can compensate).

    But, the front wall placement that optimizes the imaging for most speakers is also the location where the bass is typically least optimal. Plus, any room-induced low frequency problems with speakers running at full range cannot be independently EQ'd without the risk of coloration in the higher frequencies. In my listenings, the benefit of a properly setup and EQ'd subwoofer significantly outweighs any tradeoffs.
    Wooch's Home Theater 2.0 (Pics)
    Panasonic VIERA TH-C50FD18 50" 1080p
    Paradigm Reference Studio 40, CC, and 20 v.2
    Adire Audio Rava (EQ: Behringer Feedback Destroyer DSP1124)
    Yamaha RX-A1030
    Dual CS5000 (Ortofon OM30 Super)
    Sony UBP-X800
    Sony Playstation 3 (MediaLink OS X Server)
    Sony ES SCD-C2000ES
    JVC HR-S3912U
    Directv HR44 and WVB
    Logitech Harmony 700
    iPhone 5s/iPad 3
    Linksys WES610



    The Neverending DVD/BD Collection

    Subwoofer Setup and Parametric EQ Results *Dead Link*

  17. #17
    Forum Regular filecat13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    492
    I work both sides of the street.

    For stereo, I keep things pretty pure with a pair of JBL Performance Series stacks (PS1400: 14" ported woofer; PT800: 8' Ti inverted dome midbass, 4" Ti inverted dome midrange, 1" Ti dome tweeter with waveguide).

    For multichannel music, the stacks stay in play, augmented with four additional PT800s, a PC600 center, and a single HTPS400 sub.

    As an HT, the multichannel speakers are complemented with a pair of HTPS400 subs, set up according to the Harman International white paper on multisubs.

    Okay, I guess I work both sides and the middle of the street.

  18. #18
    Forum Regular pixelthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    tuscaloosa
    Posts
    5,528
    Quote Originally Posted by GMichael
    So you're saying, "I have a sub now but would switch to full range only if I had the $$."?
    mY KLIPSCH speakers were "full range" as are my 602's2 B&W speakers I have returned to. Money is no object as I dont drive a GM PRODUCT THAT BREAKS DOWN ALL OF THE TIME
    What I am saying is that a sub is probably best for a HT system but for audio accuracy
    full range would be nice for an audio only system.
    I am currently "between" subs right now, and dont miss one really, just hit double bass on my receiver for movees and "pure" for music
    LG 42", integra 6.9, B&W 602s2, CC6 center, dm305rears, b&w
    sub asw2500
    Panny DVDA player
    sharp Aquos BLU player
    pronto remote, technics antique direct drive TT
    Samsung SACD/DVDA player
    emotiva upa-2 two channel amp

  19. #19
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    884

    Subs have advantages

    I have good mini-monitors in both the main and HT system, so I chose the second option. But I have also had speakers with good bass down to 30 Hz and have used a sub with one of those, too. The disadvantage with mini-monitors is that they won't play as loudly as many larger speakers, but then, ours will play plenty loud enough for us.

    One can put the main speakers where they sound the best and put the subwoofer where the bass response is most even, and these are seldom the same place. As well, with the crossover, one can notch out the highest room resonance, which is about 70 hz for an 8 foot ceiling (565/8 = 70.6). I have never had that much difficulty in integrating subs and sats either at home or in a store.

    Also, very few speakers can match the extension and output of even a good mid-priced sub.
    "Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony."
    ------Heraclitus of Ephesis (fl. 504-500 BC), trans. Wheelwright.

  20. #20
    AR Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    southall UK England
    Posts
    15

    Lightbulb Rel

    I am not a good expert on subs. But maybe try rel because they can really go low down to the edge. My father use to have a rel stadium sub for his old acoustic energy reference speakers. Because they were base shy in our old big living room. So the best key figure is mabey a rel or mabey not?.

    Hope this helps

  21. #21
    test the blind blindly emorphien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    919
    Well I was going to get a sub a year ago, wound up getting new speakers instead. I'd like a full range pair of speakers, and if I can integrate a sub with it well then I'd include a sub in a system as well.

  22. #22
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    Wow, a sub thread from the past sticks it's head out of the sand.
    I've got a huge sub for HT and two full range mains now. They work and play well with each other. For music the sub only kicks in below 40 htz. For HT it does it's work from 80 htz down. Swithing from one set up to the other is just a press of a button.
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  23. #23
    Tyler Acoustics Fan drseid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Posts
    823
    I guess I will go with "it depends" as a couple other folks have. I personally go with two full-range mains that are flat to 25hz and down 6db at 20hz, so a sub would not help much... That said, I have nothing against using a properly integrated quality sub even with nearly full-range mains for music to fill in the lowest octave.

    In some cases, a sub/sat system is really the best way to go (like in a relatively small room for instance). Not all rooms can handle the proper placement of a true full-range pair of speakers as they can sometimes be quite large and deep.

    As for HT, I use a sub for LFE, but everything else is full range... Definitely I feel subs come in handy for HT.

    ---Dave
    Integra DHC-40.2 Pre/Pro
    Coda 2 X 200 Watt Amp
    Rotel RB-985 5 X 100 Watt Amp
    2 Tyler Acoustics 2 Piece Linbrook Signature System
    1 Tyler Linbrook Signature Center Channel
    3 Tyler Taylo Reference Monitors
    1 ACI Titan II Sub
    Toshiba HD-A1 HD DVD
    Panasonic BDT-210 + 350 Blu-ray
    Consonance Droplet CDP-5.0
    Sony 55NX-810 1080p 3D-LED HDTV

    Office:
    Opera Audio Consonance CD-120
    Jolida 1301A 2 X 30 Watt Int. Amp (Sovtek Tubes)
    Opera Audio Consonance Eric-1 Speakers

  24. #24
    Forum Regular pixelthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    tuscaloosa
    Posts
    5,528
    And dont forget that most "subs" are actually "bass modules".
    Few subs actually go down deep to real "sub" levels
    LG 42", integra 6.9, B&W 602s2, CC6 center, dm305rears, b&w
    sub asw2500
    Panny DVDA player
    sharp Aquos BLU player
    pronto remote, technics antique direct drive TT
    Samsung SACD/DVDA player
    emotiva upa-2 two channel amp

  25. #25
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    Quote Originally Posted by pixelthis
    And dont forget that most "subs" are actually "bass modules".
    Few subs actually go down deep to real "sub" levels
    What? Bass Modules? Dr. Amar, that you?

    What exactly is a "sub" level?
    These things are called subwoofer for good reason. You've been around long enough, you should know, and understand the history.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •