Speakers designed without a sweet spot?

[KRiTiKaL]

Hey folks! Any speaker companies that design speakers for wide dispersion? I am looking for a main speaker that does not really have a center sweet spot. I have seen some rear speakers that look as if they projected differently. Any companies to look up? Thanks

[This Guy]

a lot of the planar and electrostat panel speakers have a very wide dispersion...also are usually on the more expensive side. You could try out Magnepan, their cheapest two way speaker is the MMG, last time i checked it was $500, but they're online only. Generally, the speakers with the wider dispersion will not go as loud as lower dispersion speakers (obviously efficiency and power handling are variables). I dont really know of any others, havent been paying a lot of attention to audio lately.

[Mark111867]

You might want to look into the Mirage Omni series. Good luck.

[bargainseeker]

The inexpensive Magnepan speakers actually have very narrow dispersion of high frequencies and a small "sweet spot". I agree that the Mirage Omni or OmniSat series would be good bets. Another alternative would be using dipolar or bipolar surround speakers as mains as well as surrounds.

[Buzz Roll]

Wide dispersion = Ohm Walsh series.

http://www.sixmoons.com/audioreviews/ohm/ohm.html

http://www.sixmoons.com/audioreviews/walsh/micro.html

Although I'm not a review nut, John Potis gives a good idea of what to expect with the Ohms. They sound really good.

[Pat D]

a lot of the planar and electrostat panel speakers have a very wide dispersion...also are usually on the more expensive side. You could try out Magnepan, their cheapest two way speaker is the MMG, last time i checked it was $500, but they're online only. Generally, the speakers with the wider dispersion will not go as loud as lower dispersion speakers (obviously efficiency and power handling are variables). I dont really know of any others, havent been paying a lot of attention to audio lately.

Planar speakers have narrow dispersion. It has to do with the large driving surfaces. Generally, the larger the driver, the lower the frequency it starts to bean. Here are links to the Stereophile measurements for a couple of them:

http://stereophile.com/loudspeakerre...95/index6.html

http://stereophile.com/loudspeakerre...20/index7.html

Here's a link to Stereophile measurements for a well-designed 2 way box speaker:

http://stereophile.com/loudspeakerre...30/index4.html

Which will work better for someone depends on their taste, their listening room and the set up. I have owned both planar speakers and forward radiating box speakers.

[kexodusc]

Every Maggie I've ever heard, including their best models requires your head to be locked into a vise otherwise you lose the center image and soundstaging...not exactly what I'd call "wide dispersion".
Now, if you can sit yourself into the sweet spot, a good planar can sound phenomenal.

[theaudiohobby]

A hybrid planer with very wide dispersion.

[thepogue]

with my ML's also...in the right position your in La La land...unlike anything I've heard..but in my smallish room...a few inches to one side or the other...and your just outside of La La land...now to be fair...even off center of the "sweet spot" the ML can best many mnay speakers out there (and should for the ching=ching they get for them)...but in the "zone" whew...it's magic!

Pogue

Every Maggie I've ever heard, including their best models requires your head to be locked into a vise otherwise you lose the center image and soundstaging...not exactly what I'd call "wide dispersion".
Now, if you can sit yourself into the sweet spot, a good planar can sound phenomenal.

[RGA]

The value of not being tied to a sweetspot is dependant on your room and how you listen and frankly is not the least bit important if you buy what you need for your listening space. i listen in a chair in the middle of my room - the chair is on rollers because it is a computer chair and my computer is in the room. When I am on the computer and listening to music I am well over to the right(looking at the speakers). To me tonality and timbral accuracy is more important.

That said it can be nice to have good off axis response which is why I can listen to my system against the right wall the left wall center and I get very similar nearly identical results with my main system -- my second system does well for a horn set-up in that it sounds similar off axis but I don't think it gets the center image bang on even in the sweetspot. My main system does an incredible job on acoustic music because whether you are in front of a piano or beside it t should still create the sound of a piano in a believable way -- or any other instrument. Besides the system should be conveying the differences between recordings -- system one does it one helluva lot better than system two and every other system i have ever heard - which is why it is system one.

It simply comes down to, as boring as it may be, listening and finding something you like -- if you need techno-babble and to read graphs it probably meant the system didn't engage you on it's own merit -- and if it didn't do that then you made a mistake IMO.

[This Guy]

Planar speakers have narrow dispersion. It has to do with the large driving surfaces. Generally, the larger the driver, the lower the frequency it starts to bean. Here are links to the Stereophile measurements for a couple of them:

http://stereophile.com/loudspeakerre...95/index6.html

http://stereophile.com/loudspeakerre...20/index7.html

Here's a link to Stereophile measurements for a well-designed 2 way box speaker:

http://stereophile.com/loudspeakerre...30/index4.html

Which will work better for someone depends on their taste, their listening room and the set up. I have owned both planar speakers and forward radiating box speakers.

my bad, been a little rusty lately

[RGA]

One thing I liked about the B&W CDM 1NT was that you could sit without your head in a vice and get a similar presentation - if the 705 wasn't so annyoingly banal I would have bothered to check - but I assume it too would have no sweetspot or a bigger listening area. But then I have horns which supposedly should be bad for this and they are not.

I think what you want concern yourself with is how they sound...the fact that they sound the same in a wider area doesn't help if it sounds boring or bad in a wider area. I'm puzzled by people who place huge emphasis on this - I personally listen in a listening chair or on a couch - assuming the speaker is respsectable in the off axis response it should be more than fine. Heck even average speakers like the Paradigm Monitor 5 seemed to do very well off axis - but a zingy treble and an overall artifical etchy sound doesn't make me want to buy em - give me head in a vice but great sound anyday,

[kexodusc]

RGA: I think you've got to find balance here. The worst thing to me is having to spend 38 seconds of a song fitting your head exactly in a small sweet spot in order to enjoy the music. Every slight deviation then disrupts the presentation. The Monitor 5's are actually a good example of this dilemma, IMO, as are most speakers in this price range I've heard. Off axis response is fine, and necessary to cool the Monitor 5's down a bit to my liking, but the I can't think of anything more articial than an intensesly focused center image that disappears when you move a bit. This sounds more fake to me than boom and sizzle speakers, not very musical at all. Good imaging, sure, but at the expense of a 3-D presentation. Real performances do not have the sound of pin point imaging.

[Feanor]

a lot of the planar and electrostat panel speakers have a very wide dispersion...also are usually on the more expensive side. ...

As Pat D points out, it depends on the width of the driver panel. Magneplanars and the majorityt of electrostatics have relatively wide panels and have very restricted sweet spots.

On the other hand narrow drivers, i.e. most ribbons, quasi-ribbons (like Newform Research), and narrow planars (such as Bohlender-Graebener), have pretty wide lateral dispersion which is sometimes accompanied by restricted vertical dispersion, especially when the driver is quite tall. Arguably, for typical seated listening, you'll be best off with the wider lateral but narrow vertical dispersion.

[bargainseeker]

On the other hand narrow drivers, i.e. most ribbons, quasi-ribbons (like Newform Research), and narrow planars (such as Bohlender-Graebener), have pretty wide lateral dispersion which is sometimes accompanied by restricted vertical dispersion, especially when the driver is quite tall. Arguably, for typical seated listening, you'll be best off with the wider lateral but narrow vertical dispersion.

Your comment reminded me of a loudspeaker I came across while browsing the Swans website. The Swans F3F uses a ribbon midrange as well as a ribbon tweeter. Take a look at the measurements of the F3F. In particular, notice the horizontal response plot. Now there is a speaker without a sweet spot. Apparently these can be special ordered in the U.S. for around $2000 per pair.

[theaudiohobby]

All is true so far, however if you use Distributed Mode Panel (DML), the driver excites panel resonance as opposed to ordinary pistonic motion, DML panels have a wide dispersion pattern and wider sweetspot, they are are dipoles but in almost all commercial implementations the backwave energy is damped, so that energy above 250Hz does not overpower the traditional woofer driver.

[dba]

Von Schweikert use a unique home-made crossover for this very reason,speakers with na narrow sweet spot are a waste of time in my opnion hence why i use their VR-1s

[Pat D]

All is true so far, however if you use Distributed Mode Panel (DML), the driver excites panel resonance as opposed to ordinary pistonic motion, DML panels have a wide dispersion pattern and wider sweetspot, they are are dipoles but in almost all commercial implementations the backwave energy is damped, so that energy above 250Hz does not overpower the traditional woofer driver.

Do we have actual measurements to verify the wide dispersion of NXT speakers?

[theaudiohobby]

Do we have actual measurements to verify the wide dispersion of NXT speakers?

I do not have the dispersion pattern measurements for my specific implementation, but this AES paper gives peer-verified measurements for a typical DML panel alias NXT speaker implementation.

[theaudiohobby]

Do we have actual measurements to verify the wide dispersion of NXT speakers?

Some measurements for the Cyrus Icon

http://www.audiosale.dk/files/klipsch-rf7.pdf

[Pat D]

Hey folks! Any speaker companies that design speakers for wide dispersion? I am looking for a main speaker that does not really have a center sweet spot. I have seen some rear speakers that look as if they projected differently. Any companies to look up? Thanks

Quite a number of speakers nowadays have an even frequency response over a wide horizontal dispersion and at least a reasonable vertical dispersion. I have often cited an interview that John Atkinson of Stereophile did with Paul Barton of PSB. It's very clear about the basics and here is a good quote:

"Take a speaker that has smooth sound, power, good off-axis response, good on-axis response. When you think about it, it's probably the most forgiving speaker in any kind of environment. Because when the room is dead, all you hear is the on-axis sound, and it's okay! And when it's in a live room, you hear the sound power, or the reverberant energy, and that's okay!"

http://stereophile.com/interviews/231/index3.html

The link is to the particular page but you can easily go the Page 1 of the interview.

Anyway, such speakers maintain a good stereo image over a fairly wide angle.

You don't mention a price range but quite a number of manufacturers make good, wide dispersion speakers, such as Paradigm, PSB, Energy, Mirage, Totem, Axiom, B & W, Kef, Dynaudio, Boston Acoustics, and many others. I gave a link to the Stereophile site, which has a lot of speaker reviews on it, so I will link to Soundstage.com here:

http://www.soundstageav.com/speakermeasurements.html

[Buzz Roll]

I had a pair of psb floorstanders and I really thought they had an even-keel tonal balance and wide listening area until I brought home a pair of Ohm Microwalshes. Suddenly all of those traits were gone. I really thought I was going to hold on to them for a second system, but I could not continue listening to them. The more I listened to other floorstanders (under $2500), 99% of them had the same problems as the psbs. Now keep in mind that the Ohms aren't perfect, nothing is at the $1K price range, but considering what you are looking for, they are a choice to consider. Also, keep in mind that I'm a/bing speakers at home, not from store to store. Oh, and stay away from Stereophile reviews.

[Pat D]

I had a pair of psb floorstanders and I really thought they had an even-keel tonal balance and wide listening area until I brought home a pair of Ohm Microwalshes. Suddenly all of those traits were gone. I really thought I was going to hold on to them for a second system, but I could not continue listening to them. The more I listened to other floorstanders (under $2500), 99% of them had the same problems as the psbs. Now keep in mind that the Ohms aren't perfect, nothing is at the $1K price range, but considering what you are looking for, they are a choice to consider. Also, keep in mind that I'm a/bing speakers at home, not from store to store. Oh, and stay away from Stereophile reviews.

I'm glad you like your speakers. A few years ago, I heard a pair of Ohm F speakers in my dealer't big listening area.

Some friends of mine like the Mirage OM speakers, which are almost omnidirectional. I thought the tonal balance was a bit too laid back in the store but they were enjoyable. The balance was too laid back at home, too. As well, I just couldn't get them to sound right in our living room. My old Quads had worked better, though not perfectly.

On the other hand, the PSB Stratus Minis work very well in our living room, and no doubt a number of other forward radiating speakers would, too.

[Feanor]

... A few years ago, I heard a pair of Ohm F speakers in my dealer's big listening area.
...

I owned a pair back around 1974-80. They were true omnidirectionals. They were large, inefficient, and 4 ohm; I had to buy a Phase Linear 400. Though their sound was imperfect in some ways, I have always regretted selling them. The Phase Linear, on the other hand, I still own though it is not in use at the moment.

[nate dog]

NHT is comming out with a new speaker line called the XD series. Very expensive, but supposidly has a huge "sweet spot" that essentially makes all listening positions in the sweet spot. Tech TV awarded it best extreme audio product of CES.