Quote Originally Posted by Wireworm5
Oh Boy a war topic!! Just my two cents.
Saddam is and was a tyrant that needed to be removed.

So what? It was his country and he wasn't bothering us.

The uncertainty he posed by supplying fuel and resources to terrorist groups whether or not he was actually involved was too risky to be left unchecked.

Never proved and not important.

However he should have been dealt with after the 1st gulf war which was brought to a halt due to the threat of Israel entering the conflict after the scud missisle attacks.

Very true.

One has to wonder though that maybe the only way to control Iraqi people is to have a tyrant like Saddam in charge.

It's not our business who runs their country.

Secondly, conventionally speaking there isn't a country on earth that can match the US superior weapons power and technology. Air power is a decisive weapon which you have in spades. The fact that you overan the 3rd largest army in the world at the time of the 1st gulf war in a matter of 2 months should serve as a warning to any other country that is foolish enought to try.

BFD

However guorrilla warfare is another matter and this is where the ememies will to fight may be greater than the America's will to fight. And can last for years.

Neutron bomb the entire Middle East.
With all those pesky people gone we could have all the oil for ourselves. Who could stop us?