Quote Originally Posted by nightflier
lil't, you're just making my point. The new PS3s are another example of how Sony won't stand behind it's own products, in this case SACD.

Ironic how that works out, isn't it?

Dimwit!
Wow, you are even more stupid than stupid. Can you tell me why in the hell I would add another $60 bucks to the price of my player for a technology that NO record company wants to support? I know you don't have a brain, so can you use the air between your ears? SACD was not dropped or unsupported by Sony, get you facts straight nightidiot. It was the record companies that didn't support SACD, because quite frankly the world is PCM and not DSD. Sony developed post production tools for it, supported all the processors it sold, and continue to do so to this day. So if you don't think they stood behind their product, then you are quite a bit less smart than the stupid I think you already are.

The bluray spec makes considerations for 8 channels of 24bit audio up to a 192khz sample rate. That performance EXCEEDS what SACD can do, and it is compatible with the equipment in 96% of the studio's all over the world. SACD has been supplanted by another better technology, so why add the cost to the PS3 by supporting something that has already been supplanted by a better technology? Wait, don't answer that, it would be like watching dumb and dumber all over again, and I just cannot bare anymore of your short sighted non thinking responses.

We have Dts-HD MA lossless, Dolby TrueHD, AND PCM, all of which outperform SACD, and all supported by the PS3. So just how crippled does that make the PS3? Oh wait, don't answer that either You know nightsh!t, you were never that bright from the beginning, but it appears you are getting worse by the minute.