Does anyone actually have a valid point here that understands the nature of Frank Miller? I have to agree with Woochifer on his points about film and filmmaking. I can't even believe that there is even an argument about this. I mean, opinions are opinions, but there is no RIGHT OR WRONG about it. Frank Miller's vision of the story of the 300 SPARTANS is just one stylized interpretation. It's not a historical documentary nor does it ever claim to be. Again, the style IS the substance people! Did anyone actually see SIN CITY? Same thing, this time SPARTANS.

It was just a cool, edgy, stylized film that had tons of action, little story, and that's all there is. It's not the greatest film ever made, certainly not the worst, but I don't see this discussion really going anywhere.