Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 46
  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    21

    Replacing Kenwood VR-615 Receiver

    I've had this for 7-8 years now. The center and sub will often cease to function randomly. Cycling the power occasionally fixes the problem, but this is happening less frequently. So I'm all but certain that its on its last legs. I've never replaced something like this before, and have some questions.

    • Can I swap this Kenwood 100w 5.1 receiver out with a more modern 100w 7.1 receiver of any brand? I need to be able to connect the existing speaker wiring to the new receiver, and can't rewire the room. Changing speakers is possible, but I'd like to avoid that if I can.
    • Can I adjust a 7.1 receiver to function as a 5.1? Adding speakers is not an option.
    • Any recommendations for a new receiver? My requirements are:
      • Decoding for Dolby, DTS, and any other modern standards I may not yet be aware of.
      • Old fasioned RCA stereo input (red, white). Pro Logic II remixing is a plus, but I can live without that.
      • 6-channel surround input via a set of 6 rca cables. I believe this is an uncommon option, but the Kenwood (and my equally obscure Malata dvd player) did have them, at least.
      • Digital optical audio input.

  2. #2
    Chicago IL
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chicago ,IL
    Posts
    1,188
    I had exactly the same receiver and I ended up selling it. I like how it has internal amplifier for the subwoofer and at the same time output for a powered subwoofer.

    Any newer surround receiver will have the options the Kenwood had and even more. You can use the same speakers without a problem but if you have it set up for 5.1 than you have to stick to 5.1 because 7.1 requires to ass 2 more speakers in your case.

    You can use the same speakers without changing them with any receiver. One problem you may have is the subwoofer, if you don't have a powered subwoofer and you just have a regular one you might have a problem there because most of the new receivers require powered subwoofer so you have to watch on that before you buy!

  3. #3
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    21
    Thank you. Some followups:

    If my sub only has wires connected to the receiver, can I assume that it isn't powered?

    Does the new receiver have to match the 100w rating? Can it be higher or lower?

  4. #4
    Chicago IL
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chicago ,IL
    Posts
    1,188
    Yes if your sub is connected with speaker wires it is not powered. Tell me the exact model so I can tell you for sure. The powered subwoofers have a power cable that connects to the outlet like the receivers do.

    The subwoofer can be any watts, it doesn't have to be exactly the same as the receiver because you use only the receiver output sound to give it a signal to the powered subwoofer.

    Powered subwoofer again means that in the subwoofer box there is an amplifier that drives the whole sub so no worries about the subwoofer watts, of course everyone wants more watts

  5. #5
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    21
    I've misplaced my manual, butthe sub is most certainly not powered, then.

    Does what you said apply to the other speakers as well? That is, I could connect them to the receiver regardless of watt rating?

  6. #6
    Chicago IL
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chicago ,IL
    Posts
    1,188
    Yes the other speakers you can use them with the other receivers.

  7. #7
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    21
    Thank you very much for all of your help. Though, I have to admit, I am confused. If the speakers are interchangable, what exactly does the watt rating mean?

  8. #8
    Chicago IL
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chicago ,IL
    Posts
    1,188
    The only problem you have to worry is the subwoofer, everything else with the speakers is fine so go ahead and get a new receiver.

    If you have any other questions let me know

  9. #9
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    Manufacturers give an output power rating for the amp section of the receiver as well as many specifications. Speaker manufacturers give a power handling or recommended power rating as sort of a guide what size amp to match them to. Dak is correct that it's not anything to worry about. Most people blow speakers by not having enough power. They turn the receiver up to far then it begins to distort and that is what usually blows a speaker.

    For a good middle range I'd recommend the Onkyo TX-608. This receiver demands space around it or good air flow. It's a good performer. You can go cheaper with Sony or Pioneer, they both have receiver's at or around $199.00 that still offers HDMI and HD audio formats. Can't go wrong with Denon, Yamaha or Marantz either.

    A good sub priced right is Emotiva's Ultra 10 or 12, depending on your room size. You just missed a good sale on these. www.emotiva.com

    Replacing the receiver should be as simple as taking the Kenwood out and putting the new one in it's spot, hook up wise any way, set up may be a different story. So reading reviews and looking for the easy set up might be something you want to do. New receivers almost all have some type of auto speaker set up which you will probably find handy.

  10. #10
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    21
    Ah, space concerns. Knew I forgot something. This has to fit in my wall unit - I've got about an inch on either side to work with, compared to my current one. Thanks again for the info, everyone.

  11. #11
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    21
    Ah, space concerns. Knew I forgot something. This has to fit in my wall unit - I've got about an inch on either side to work with, compared to my current one. Thanks again for the info, everyone.

  12. #12
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    21
    Huh... the inputs for the speaker wires on the model you recommended look nothing like the ones on my old one. Should I be concerned?


    http://media.ldlc.com/ld/products/00...00759223_2.jpg

    http://elektrotanya.com/PREVIEWS/634...5_sm.pdf_1.png

  13. #13
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    Don't worry about the speaker connections, I'm guessing Kenwood used the push tabs where you just stick the bare wire in, Onkyo most likely is using a "5-way binding post", you just unscrew it a bit with your finger tips and put the bare wire under the thumb tab and screw it back down.

    Width shouldn't be a problem either as most receivers are a standard 17". If your shelf for the receiver isn't open in the back I would recommend maybe going to another brand than Onkyo. Onkyo uses a high current design in the power amp section and it generates a lot of heat. Heat no good for electronics.

  14. #14
    Chicago IL
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chicago ,IL
    Posts
    1,188
    If you feel comfortable with the Kenwood VR series receivers, just go to ebay and write "Kenwood VR" and you can purchase the same or similar one so you don't have to worry for anything!

  15. #15
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    But if replacing it would be wise to modernize if you think you will ever go to HDTV or the Blu-ray format at some point. Digital processing has come quite a way since that Kenwood was built.

    Actually, the 6-way, or multichannel, analog has become more available due to SACD and Blu-ray first coming out with the onboard decoders.

  16. #16
    Chicago IL
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chicago ,IL
    Posts
    1,188
    Yes that is true, I know it is better to get something newer.

  17. #17
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    21
    Thanks again, you've all been really helpful. I'm actually already using an HD display. Am I missing out on anything by using optical cables for my audio (as opposed to HDMI), or just quality/convenience? I'm glad to hear about the increased popularity of the 6ch input. I recall the concept baffling some local retailers when I purchased the cables yars ago.

    Someone on another forum gave me this piece of advice regarding the speakers:


    whether or not something supports your speakers depends on what the impedance of your speakers are.

    most US receivers are rated at 6 and 8 ohm. Some are rated at 4, 6, 8 ohm. Most good receivers that aren't rated for 4 ohm will still support, you'll probably just run kinda hot.

    so the question is what impedance your speakers are. if its a HTIB set of speakers, those will sometimes be odd ratings. I've seem some 3 ohm. If you are running a mid level system you put together, they are probably 8 ohm.

    if you are running HTIB speakers, i'd say toss them when you upgrade your receiver.


    Is that accurate?

  18. #18
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    Don't worry about impedance, if your speakers worked well with the Kenwood they will be fine with what ever other brand you use. Just to give a bit of understanding a 4 ohm speaker will draw more current from an amp than a 8 ohm speaker, some receivers aren't really designed to handle the current draw of a 4 ohm speaker but in most instances receivers do fine with 4 ohms as long as they aren't driven hard. It's true they may get a bit warmer. I've used Kenwood in the past and they aren't high current so I'm sure if your speaker s did fine with the 615 they will do fine with any other receiver. Also, the 4, 6 or 8 ohm rating is just a "nominal" rating, impedance swings with the music, program, demand put on it. So a more stable impedance is better than one with wild swings which may dip well below 4 ohms. It's that low swing that will bring an amp to it's knees if it isn't capable of delivering some current upon demand.

  19. #19
    Forum Regular pixelthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    tuscaloosa
    Posts
    5,528

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by starschwar
    Thanks again, you've all been really helpful. I'm actually already using an HD display. Am I missing out on anything by using optical cables for my audio (as opposed to HDMI), or just quality/convenience? I'm glad to hear about the increased popularity of the 6ch input. I recall the concept baffling some local retailers when I purchased the cables yars ago.

    Someone on another forum gave me this piece of advice regarding the speakers:


    whether or not something supports your speakers depends on what the impedance of your speakers are.

    most US receivers are rated at 6 and 8 ohm. Some are rated at 4, 6, 8 ohm. Most good receivers that aren't rated for 4 ohm will still support, you'll probably just run kinda hot.

    so the question is what impedance your speakers are. if its a HTIB set of speakers, those will sometimes be odd ratings. I've seem some 3 ohm. If you are running a mid level system you put together, they are probably 8 ohm.

    if you are running HTIB speakers, i'd say toss them when you upgrade your receiver.


    Is that accurate?
    Todays modern equipment is very forgiving of what speaker is used where, modern amps
    are capable of 6 to 8 ohm speakers, usually, and some can handle four.
    In other words, don't worry about it.
    As for HDMI, if you get a new receiver, most have HDMI switching, which means you plug
    the HDMI from your devices into the back, the HDMI out into the TV.
    the sound is routed through the receiver, the pic goews through the tv.
    I have this on my new receiver, its very nice, never have to change the input on my TV,
    JUST pick a source at the receiver.
    Your old KENWOOD is stone knives and bearskins compared to most modern receivers,
    which have all of the new codecs for BLU ray, DDII to make stereo sources sound like a 5,1 movie.
    You can't go wrong upgrading.
    LG 42", integra 6.9, B&W 602s2, CC6 center, dm305rears, b&w
    sub asw2500
    Panny DVDA player
    sharp Aquos BLU player
    pronto remote, technics antique direct drive TT
    Samsung SACD/DVDA player
    emotiva upa-2 two channel amp

  20. #20
    Forum Regular pixelthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    tuscaloosa
    Posts
    5,528

    Cool

    GET A NICE NEW "powered" sub while you're at it, there is a plug on the back of new receivers, SUB, very easy to hook up.
    Doubt if teh old one is worth the trouble.
    LG 42", integra 6.9, B&W 602s2, CC6 center, dm305rears, b&w
    sub asw2500
    Panny DVDA player
    sharp Aquos BLU player
    pronto remote, technics antique direct drive TT
    Samsung SACD/DVDA player
    emotiva upa-2 two channel amp

  21. #21
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    You will need HDMI for audio if you go with Blu-ray some day. The HD audio formats (Dolby Tru-HD & DTS-MA) have too much bandwidth to pass via optical or coaxial digital. However, if the decoder is in the player you can use the multichannel analog. The drawback is most BDP do not have as extensive speaker adjustments. Also, less sync issues with HDMI.

    If you decide to go with HDMI you want to make sure the receiver you buy has video upconversion. This will allow analog video sources like VHS to be converted so it will pass via HDMI. I think if I was you with a good excuse to buy a new receiver I'd get one with all the current audio and video capability.

    A good place to get basic buying information, to see and price receivers is www.crutchfield.com

  22. #22
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    21
    Interesting. I'm using a PS3 as my Blu-Ray player. Its connected to the Kenwood via optical, and I've never had any compatibility issues with Blu-Ray audio - Dolby HD lights up the Dolby indicator, ditto whatever the modern DTS standard is. So I've been getting a watered down version of the proper sound, then?

  23. #23
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    Quote Originally Posted by starschwar
    Interesting. I'm using a PS3 as my Blu-Ray player. Its connected to the Kenwood via optical, and I've never had any compatibility issues with Blu-Ray audio - Dolby HD lights up the Dolby indicator, ditto whatever the modern DTS standard is. So I've been getting a watered down version of the proper sound, then?
    The HD audio formats were designed to be backward compatible so even with optical you are getting slightly better sound than DVD but not the full bandwidth of the soundtrack. Dolby Tru HD & DTS-MA are said to be bit for bit the same as the master soundtrack. If you have a PS3 it would be worth stepping into HDMI. Unless buying used you'll get the inputs any way.

  24. #24
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    21
    A local store has a pretty good deal on a Samsung HWC700. Anyone have any experience with that? I haven't been able to find many in-depth reviews online.

  25. #25
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Madison, AL
    Posts
    22
    Id consider Samsung a bit of an off brand personally. However, its been shown many times that the receiver itself is probably really of less importance than your speaker setup, etc. When you pay a lot for a receiver, youre paying for the icing on top. Your mileage may vary...

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •