Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: MCACC vs. YPAO

  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2003

    MCACC vs. YPAO

    I haven't dealt with either of these but I have been doing some reading as I am looking to move into a home theater setup.

    I am curious though to see who preffers one to the other. I know there are different "versions" of each MCACC has manual, automatic 1 & 2 and advanced. while yamaha adds more and more to their YPAO system as you go up in their product line.

    Which do you preffer and which would you suggest

    first off overall comparing the best vs the best

    secondly comparing middle of the road for instance the pioneer elite's automatic 1 vs a middle of the line yamaha htr

    thanks for the input

  2. #2
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    come on now I've been a member here for a year now and I know some of you guys have tried atleast one of these systems out uf not both.

    dust off the keyboard for me please.


    you could throw the denon room calibration system in there too or any others you have tried

    thanks again

  3. #3
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    OK, I'll bite! I have tried extensively the YPAO on the 1400 and the MCACC on the 2012K (45TX). I was initially very high on the YPAO or any calibrations for that matter because auto calibrations are an excellent thing if one is not good with receiver setup or speaker calibrations. So for those these Auto calibrating receivers is the answer. The auto calibration will "find" your speakers, check their polarity and determine their sizes and distances from the listening position as well. Then comes the room EQing (if available) and voila, you are set to enjoy movies and HT.
    But, everytime I had the receiver calibrate for me, I would go back with a need to tweak some settings on the EQ as I simply did not "agree" with the auto setting. The disagreement would come after some days of listening to the auto settings. I would not be happy with the way the mids or the highs sounded or something else for that matter.
    Without the benefit of calibrating the LFE frequencies, these auto features are OK to have in a receiver but not absolutely necessary as Wooch pointed out long time ago when I first did my review on YPAO. You can do very well with an SPL meter and calibrate your system with an Avia or VE disc and be happy.
    So if you ask me which one is better, I would say of those two I'd take the YPAO over the MCACC as the YPAO uses a parametric EQ and not a graphich EQ as the one used by MCACC.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-12-2004, 07:33 AM
  2. New Receiver: Yamaha or Denon?
    By AZHT in forum Home Theater/Video
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 06-17-2004, 08:54 AM
  3. Who Has an SPL Calibrated System?
    By magictooth in forum Home Theater/Video
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: 05-13-2004, 10:38 AM
  4. Can someone explain YPAO to me?
    By kexodusc in forum Home Theater/Video
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-22-2004, 07:47 AM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-17-2003, 09:50 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts