Maybe Wooch & Pix leave me alone now

[Mr Peabody]

Smokey, if you have component outputs on your DVD you'd be just as well off as using HDMI in your situation.

[Smokey]

Smokey, if you have component outputs on your DVD you'd be just as well off as using HDMI in your situation.

Does that mean will not see any picture improvment if switching from Component to HDMI output on the DVD player?

(I guess part of answer to above question would be whether the TV or DVD player have better video processor).

[BadAssJazz]

Does that mean will not see any picture improvment if switching from Component to HDMI output on the DVD player?

I can't speak for others, but I could definitely tell a marked improvement between component and hdmi in my setup at the time. Both on the DVD player (back when I used a DVD player) and on the Comcast/Motorola cable box. The only way to know for sure is to try it and see.

PS: My setup at the time included a 42" 720p Panny plasma and a run of the mill Pioneeer Elite DV49 DVD player. Out of curiosity, I tried both component and HDMI to see which offered the better video. I used a cheap Acoustic Research HDMI cable (which cost less than $10), but a mid-grade Ixos Component Cable (which retailed for $50 when I bought it). HDMI technology generally trumps component.

[Sir Terrence the Terrible]

Well its about dang time. I am near the end of my life, and this schmuck finally lands in the 21st century.

Good show Smoke, enjoy your new mind numbing box

[pixelthis]

Does that mean will not see any picture improvment if switching from Component to HDMI output on the DVD player?

(I guess part of answer to above question would be whether the TV or DVD player have better video processor).

You will see a (very) slight improvement from the fact that digital conversions will
be zero, as opposed to component, which will have two digital to analog conversions.
I WOULD get a BLU player, you can get one for 68 bucks, diff between that and a DVD
player is marginal, and a BLU player will also play DVD better than any DVD player
will, there is an actual improvement in the pic.
Also, using your new monitor for computer is optimum, once you get used to the larger
screen you wont understand how you ever lived without it.
Video cards with HDMI are rather cheap, and thats the way to go, but my first priority
would be a BLU player, the pic will be better than broadcast, even on a 720p set.
BTW, on a 32" screen, 720p will be fine, 1080p is always preferable , but at a 32" size
its hard to tell much diff.
Again, congrats, and as time goes by you will come to understand why I bugged you
so much, HD is simply STAR TREK compared to SD, its a completely different world.

[Woochifer]

Does that mean will not see any picture improvment if switching from Component to HDMI output on the DVD player?

As with all things, YMMV. It depends on the internal design of the TV and the DVD/Blu-ray player (some of them use different processing circuits for the analog and digital paths, so the A/D conversion is not the only variable to look out for). Try it with both and see which one you like better. On my parents' older TV, the component video input looks better than the HDMI input. With my TV, the HDMI input is the way to go.

On my 32-inch LCD with an upsampling DVD player, I use the HDMI to take advantage of the upsampling capability. There's a picture-quality difference, but it can be hard for us to see at the distance where we watch that TV.

Agreed that on a 32" TV, it can be difficult to see differences with many variables.

Keep in mind that the upsampling feature can be enabled with a component video output as well. In general, upsampling with DVDs has been way oversold as a feature, since it doesn't add any real resolution to a 480i source signal.

With any flat panel TV, the source signal has to be upscaled and deinterlaced to the native resolution just so it can properly display in the first place. An upsampling DVD player will simply perform the rescaling and deinterlacing before it gets sent to the TV. If the DVD signal is not rescaled and/or deinterlaced by the player, then the HDTV itself will handle that task.

So, regardless of whether the DVD player does upsampling or outputs via HDMI, the upsampling will happen at some point.

[02audionoob]

As with all things, YMMV. It depends on the internal design of the TV and the DVD/Blu-ray player (some of them use different processing circuits for the analog and digital paths, so the A/D conversion is not the only variable to look out for). Try it with both and see which one you like better. On my parents' older TV, the component video input looks better than the HDMI input. With my TV, the HDMI input is the way to go.



Agreed that on a 32" TV, it can be difficult to see differences with many variables.

Keep in mind that the upsampling feature can be enabled with a component video output as well. In general, upsampling with DVDs has been way oversold as a feature, since it doesn't add any real resolution to a 480i source signal.

With any flat panel TV, the source signal has to be upscaled and deinterlaced to the native resolution just so it can properly display in the first place. An upsampling DVD player will simply perform the rescaling and deinterlacing before it gets sent to the TV. If the DVD signal is not rescaled and/or deinterlaced by the player, then the HDTV itself will handle that task.

So, regardless of whether the DVD player does upsampling or outputs via HDMI, the upsampling will happen at some point.

Makes sense. What I see that's better with the HDMI connection is somehow sharper...like less visual noise. I thought the component output was prevented from upscaling for copyright reasons...must have dreamed that.

[Woochifer]

Makes sense. What I see that's better with the HDMI connection is somehow sharper...like less visual noise. I thought the component output was prevented from upscaling for copyright reasons...must have dreamed that.

That's content dependent, and you're right that most the copy protection with most DVDs would prevent the upscaled signal from going out via component. They will output a deinterlaced signal regardless.

[Smokey]

Well its about dang time. I am near the end of my life, and this schmuck finally lands in the 21st century.

Blame it on my CRT TV that refused to die

Now I am stuck with heavy analog CRT TV that I don't think anybody will buy.

You will see a (very) slight improvement from the fact that digital conversions will be zero, as opposed to component, which will have two digital to analog conversions.

That is what make me think that HDMI will probably have better picture due to less picture conversions. I tried different DVD settings and outputs, and best quality PQ is component output in progressive mode. BTW, Walmart have LG bluray player back in stock for $80.

Just wait 'til you calibrate it.

Other than adjusting the Backlight at night vs daytime, other picture adjustments seem be right on money with slight variations. I am glad there is no need to do any advance adjustments via service menu as nobody seem to know the hidden codes for AOC brand.

[Woochifer]

Other than adjusting the Backlight at night vs daytime, other picture adjustments seem be right on money with slight variations. I am glad there is no need to do any advance adjustments via service menu as nobody seem to know the hidden codes for AOC brand.

Unless those adjustments were done using a calibration disc with a color filter, you don't know what "right on money" actually looks like. Setting a TV so that it's as close as possible to a calibrated reference spec shows you what the TV is supposed to look like. Once that's set, then you can tweak it to your preferences.

The disadvantage with these off-brands is that there really aren't any service manuals, or vendors for spare parts. Might be better that you don't know how to get into the service menus!

[pixelthis]

[QUOTE=Smokey]Blame it on my CRT TV that refused to die

Now I am stuck with heavy analog CRT TV that I don't think anybody will buy.

Why would anybody buy a horse buggy in 1955?
I WOULD "donate" it to GOODWILL OR SOMETHING.
When the hospital I used to work at went to LCD, the guys doing the job had a trailer
into which they would toss the old CRT monitors. I ASKED what they were going to do
with them, and they said probably junk them, couldn't give em away

That is what make me think that HDMI will probably have better picture due to less picture conversions. I tried different DVD settings and outputs, and best quality PQ is component output in progressive mode. BTW, Walmart have LG bluray player back in stock for $80.

A friend caught them after Christmas and got that player for 65 bucks.
And of course a monitor will convert any format to its native res, but progressive displays
tend to handle progressive signals a tad better, except for 1080i, wigh is simply deinterlaced to 1080p(not in your case, tho)

Other than adjusting the Backlight at night vs daytime, other picture adjustments seem be right on money with slight variations. I am glad there is no need to do any advance adjustments via service menu as nobody seem to know the hidden codes for AOC brand.

They aren't "hidden", you just need a service manual. AND AOC , while not mainstream,
is a decent brand.
Also, you will probably notice what I HAVE, MAINLY that LCD panels are remarkably
stable, require little tweeking, and usually look good out of the box.
Its their nature, CRT shoots an electron beam across a vaccum and hits a glass surface lined with phosper. The phosper and electron gun are going to wear, not so with LCD.
Of course, solid state is always more stable than tubes, crts, etc. Commonplace
knowledge that most take for granted elsewhere, but is rather controversial on this site.

[02audionoob]

Blame it on my CRT TV that refused to die

Now I am stuck with heavy analog CRT TV that I don't think anybody will buy.

And worse than that...I overheard one of the guys working a Goodwill collection center tell a donor they couldn't accept them. Last CRT I had, I listed in the free stuff section of Craigslist and literally gave it away.

[E-Stat]

Now I am stuck with heavy analog CRT TV that I don't think anybody will buy.

Mine are relegated to guest bedrooms where they will likely last forever. Congrats on the purchase. You really must get a BR player. As for me, I'm receiving two parcels via Fedex today for the HT...

rw