Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16

    Getting a little bit of interfernce from cable box:??

    Thanks for all of the input Ive received in here. I have been piecing together a surround system and really needed the guidance.

    So...I received my Denon 1905 and ran my cable box into the receiver via "composite" video cable, not "component" mind you. I am running "component" cable out to my plasma (42" Panny EDTV) from the Denon. When the picture came up, I noticed a flickering band of interference. Its not constant, but its frequent enough for a red flag. I had no other source plugged into the receiver so Im sure it was the cable box. Anyway, I then ran the cable box into the TV and I have no problems. Im cool leaving it that way, but is there a way to eliminate that issue?

    BTW, I have no issue with my DVD into the receiver, then into the TV. All is well there.

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Forum Regular edtyct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    1,370
    Any number of things could be happening, but one thing is indisputable: The composite connection from cable box is doing a disservice to the Panasonic, which is capable of a beautiful picture if given a healthy diet. If you're component-input challenged, why not get a component switcher? Copperbox offers them, but so do other electronics stores and ebay. BTW, it's always best to go directly into the TV if you can. Though it usually doesn't make any noticeable difference, it can, especially if the signal is compromised in the first place. The shortest, least complicated signal path is always preferred. The same logic applies, in some sense, to component over composite. The composite cable has to handle a lot of information that component breaks down into specialties. This is one area where the difference is nonnegotiable.

    Ed

  3. #3
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by edtyct
    Any number of things could be happening, but one thing is indisputable: The composite connection from cable box is doing a disservice to the Panasonic, which is capable of a beautiful picture if given a healthy diet. If you're component-input challenged, why not get a component switcher? Copperbox offers them, but so do other electronics stores and ebay. BTW, it's always best to go directly into the TV if you can. Though it usually doesn't make any noticeable difference, it can, especially if the signal is compromised in the first place. The shortest, least complicated signal path is always preferred. The same logic applies, in some sense, to component over composite. The composite cable has to handle a lot of information that component breaks down into specialties. This is one area where the difference is nonnegotiable.

    Ed
    Thanks! I'll look for a component switcher. Boy, Im stuck with a 4.0 right now, consisting of Pinnacle pn2 FR, FL, and 2 old, cheap KLH rear surrounds. I was a little dissappointed when I wired it up last night. The KLH's are barely noticable. I guess I cant be surprised though considering.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Anyone have experiences with cable cards???
    By oliver kuo in forum Home Theater/Video
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-06-2005, 03:08 PM
  2. S video vs component cable for non hdTV
    By IRG in forum Home Theater/Video
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-21-2005, 08:10 AM
  3. bi-wiring
    By sleeper_red in forum Cables
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 12-19-2004, 02:47 PM
  4. Let's agree on an approach to cable sonics...
    By Monstrous Mike in forum The Audio Lab, Tweaks, Mods, DIY
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-02-2004, 11:22 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •