Quote Originally Posted by Smokey
If you look at major film review sites, the bluray version of this movie does not get high remarks. For example look at this review from DVD Verdict. He ask:

"Is it worth a double-dip if you already have the DVD? Based on video quality alone, I'm not seeing a drastic enough increase in fidelity to warrant a re-purchase."

http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/vacationbluray.php
"drastic enough increase" but still an increase nonetheless. If someone doesn't already own that movie, and they want the best possible picture quality, then why would they opt for the DVD? Just because it's not as good as it should or could be does not negate the fact that there's still an "increase in fidelity." Whether it's enough for someone is their judgment call to make.

Quote Originally Posted by Smokey
I think the better question would be is whether poorly done bluray is worth %50 more in price than DVD copy?
But, again even a poorly done Blu-ray will still look better than the DVD (and I've yet to hear of an exception to this), so your question is based on a double standard.