Quote Originally Posted by Feanor
So for example when testing some AN speakers John Atkinson didn't set them up in room corners as AN prescribes for best results. So what would the measurements have been if they were set up as specified? We don't know. Atkinson justified his approach on the basis that he test are speakers in a certain way to ensure fair and consistent testing -- that's objectivity, right??
Not really objective in the least - it is however easier but it forces a square peg into a round hole - his method doesn't do justice for a lot of speakers like, interestingly enough, panels. Though the problem with the AN E review has been discussed on the High efficiency forum of audioasylum by several engineers (and a speaker competitor named Duke). The problem I had with the measurement is that the manufacturer specs them in corners and Stereophile reviewed them in the middle of the room on axis at too high a height. Now even if you want to fit all speakers into the round hole you can't really claim it doesn't meet spec. The AN E in several other magazines and by a "more" technically knowledgeable guy in Martin Colloms (the guy JA goes to for help) measured them and got the numbers.

Peter Qvortrup noted that Stereophile does a disservice to panels and some other designs. Of course if you need the measurement to tell you it's good or not then you can shop via the Sears catalog because the ear isn't good enough to spend much more than that in my view.