Quote Originally Posted by Woochifer
That's YOUR definition of PROOF?! How laughable. You ought to have your naysayer's membership revoked for all the logical holes that you left open in that statement.

So, somebody put together an invalid test. Big deal, you disregard the findings and start over. How does that PROVE your case under more valid and equitable conditions? I thought so, just conjuring up more inneuendo to avoid having to do the work yourself. BTW, jumping the gun in a chess game does not make you a winner.
What? No one has yet demonstrated hi-res to be a cause in the first place. Cart before the horse syndrome? Soiunds like you've already accepted hi-res as being a real, plausible reason for difference when it's very low on the suspect list considering existing research/studies on bandwidth audibility. All mtrycraft did was tell you of a famous incident showing the desperation they have resorted to in order to falsify positive results since they have not been achieved elsewhere in a controlled/scrutinized test scenario.

-Chris