"Well what is strange is you are dismissing my comments, yet you take these "other" engineers comments as word."

It's not strange at all. Because you claim to have a positive result, yet not demonstrated any proof of it. All I need is the facts of the test procedure, number of positive results, blinding, randomization or a reference where it is stated.

"So you can continue to argue me down, but it doesn't change my position one bit. "

So I've noticed. I just want the facts.

"A debate on audioreveiw is pointless."

A debate without any data is even more pointless.

"With all of the facts going against redbook, your arguements against high resolution seem pretty silly."

The "facts" you have presented? You mean DBTs showing that high-res is audibly different from redbook? I would love to see them.

"You can skip yourself over a cliff for all I care, I am not trying to convince or impress you anyway."

So what ARE you trying to do then?