...I provided ALL the info I that did (kitchen sink included) to counter your overly-simplistic response. PERIOD, end of story...sorry you no likey.

My take(and consequently MY response) on the "false wall" was as I outlined in text AND as I presented in those .jpegs. PERIOD, end of THAT story...

Quote Originally Posted by TtT
I guess for the same reason why you think a standing wave is a room resonance.
You mean it's not?!?!? Funny thing, these folks seem to think so:

http://www.indiana.edu/%7Eemusic/ete...standing.shtml

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...es/standw.html

I'll guess you have some new and revolutionary take on what currently comprises a standing wave in the scientific community...Oh, do 'splain Lucy...

For example you have a room whose dimensions are AxBxC...you have a loudspeaker whose low-end FR is limited so that the interaction, in that room, insofar as standing waves is concerned, is nil or negligible. Given the fact that as we move up in frequncies the wavelengths become shorter...so if we shorten a room dimension so that now it will line up with the wavelength of a lo-end freq the loudspeaker is more capable of producing, something is probably going to happen...nodes or anti-nodes...but something. Caveat emptor...

jimHJJ(...or as in your case "cabeza empty"...)