Iron Man vs Speed Racer

[markw]

From the previews, Speed Racer doesn't interest me at all. I may be the only one in the world who wasn't impressed by The Matrix franchise because it was a CGI driven exercise in techno/psychohooey and intentionally threw out any ties to reality in order to justify it's excess. This looks to be more of the same.

As for Iron Man, it seems to be more of a character driven movie where humnan interaction is the driving force and CGI exists to support that, as opposed to replace it.

It's that human stuff that makes or breaks a movie. Look at the first two Spiderman movies vs Transformers. Which would say was better?

And I'll give Robert Downey a shot at the title. Who ever thought Michael Keaton would have made a decent Batman?

[musicman1999]

I agree with Mark, i have zero interest in Speed Racer, but Iron Man looks good.

bill

[Worf101]

about $3.50 or whatever it'll cost to rent the movie when it's out on DVD. The only hting stupider than a live action "Speed Racer" movie would be a live action "Thunderbirds" movie and who would be dumb enough to waste..... oh nevermind.

Da Worfster

[AncientWalkman]

I agree with Mark, i have zero interest in Speed Racer, but Iron Man looks good.

bill

I have seen Iron Man and loved it! I would see it again too if I had the choice to see either SR or IM...no interest what so ever in SR. Sorry Speed.

[BRANDONH]

I saw it a couple of weeks ago.
Already have the Blu-Ray on pre-order with Amazon.