All I am saying Mtrycraft is that personal experience is important.


Not if it is based on flawed and unreliable testing protocols. Might as well not have them; has no meaning. No extra credit.

One can read things in books and take them for fact. Have you ever experienced things in real life that were different than what you read or expected?

All depends on the book. Magic books? Fiction? Or real science books?

Think about all the advancements in life that would never have occured if we blindly followed.

Think of all the time wasted trying to reinvent the wheel.

I have read how wonderful or on the contrary bad something could be but was suprised when I finally experienced it.

Totally situational. Maybe it was placebo at work.

All I am asking is for you to open your eyes and at least try and experience what the other side is experiencing.

Oh, my eyes are very open. What others are experiencing have not been deomnstrated to be a fact as far as audible differences we are yalking about. So, those exepriences are only a singular reality, fantasy in another word.

You may be suprised, or is that what you are concerned about?

Not at all.

I tell my 6 year old daughter all the time to try something that you do not like you may be suprised and like it.

Ah, this isn't a dislike of tastes, or anything. This is something that can be tested properly which you have not, so your claims are baseless.