Results 1 to 25 of 123
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: Using Cables as Tone Controls

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,380
    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey View Post
    Well Hyfi, that is just common knowledge. Cable signature is a no-no and quality cable makers such as Belden strive to minimize that effect. However some audio cable companies seem to ignor that fact and concentrate on cable signature and sound and charge premium for it.



    This is where most poeple faulter as there is s a difference between cables and components. Cables are passiive and their job is to transfer signal. While components are active and their job is to amplify the signal. The latter might add its own signature when amplifying the signal, while the former should transfer the signal without any alterations.



    To achieve right sonic signature (or transparency) in your system, your approach should be objectively rather than subjectively.
    Great in theory but in today's real world, Cables are now a Component and can be worked with as such. There have been some good discussions on the topic at AK recently.

    Here is a set of questions posed and one person's answers.
    <<<
    Originally Posted by robgmn
    CAN a difference in cables exist? Yes, better question is, can two different cables be the same?

    SHOULD a difference in cables exist? Absolutely.

    If differences exist, WHY do they exist? Different cable topologies and materials.

    CAN differences be measured? Yah shore, yew becha!

    CAN we hear things that cannot be measured? Highly doubtful, if you know what to measure.

    CAN things be measured that we cannot hear or sense? Yah shore, yew betcha!

    CAN two things that are measured to be identical be proven to be perceived as different? Yes, if your measurements aren't extensive enough.

    Can perception be verified with scientific testing (NOT belief; actual perception)? Yes, but it is rather painful (you must be conscious while the anal plug is inserted and removed).

    - Have you ever tried different cables in your system? Yes, I have.

    - Please describe cables (make/model or if DIY how constructed). You're kidding, right? Way too many to list.

    - Did you hear a difference? Sometimes yes, sometimes no.
    - What are your reference components? Lots of stuff.

    - Do you have any hearing issues that may impact your ability to detect differences. Age, and it isn't getting any better. Albeit, this is only a minor handicap.>>>

    I suggest that when you score some gear capable of letting these differences show you do some experimenting on your own.

    The whole premise of my post was that one CAN use cables to tame or enhance a system's lacking or overbearing characteristics. NOT should it or shouldn't it because the facts are, it does.

    With your thinking, nobody should need an Equalizer either and while many use them for room correction, just as many or more know nothing about room correction and they use them to boost or cut the treble or bass.

    Let me complete the sentence

    To achieve right sonic signature (or transparency) in your system, you need to have highly transparent and resolving gear along with the right match of cables to suit ones own tastes in the sound of their setup.

    This can rarely be done with a computer, TV, and $50 DVD players using Black & Reds.

  2. #2
    Suspended Smokey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Ozarks
    Posts
    3,959
    Quote Originally Posted by Hyfi View Post
    Great in theory but in today's real world, Cables are now a Component and can be worked with as such.
    Premisses of cable has not changed over a century. Although we have better material to build a cable, but functionality of cable has not changed. The concept here is that best cables are "soundless". Treated any other way and we are led into slippery slope...such as using an extension cord for speaker cable

    Quote Originally Posted by blackraven
    Smokey, my question for you is how do you know which cable has the right sound as it was intended to be at the time of the recording.
    To hear the intended sound of recording, your cable should be "soundless". Since every record sound differenet and your system might have its own signature, then the best approach to cable would be to choose the ones that are most transparent. And as it was said before, that can be better achived objectively rather than subjectively.

  3. #3
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,380
    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey View Post
    Premisses of cable has not changed over a century. Although we have better material to build a cable, but functionality of cable has not changed. The concept here is that best cables are "soundless". Treated any other way and we are led into slippery slope...such as using an extension cord for speaker cable



    To hear the intended sound of recording, your cable should be "soundless". Since every record sound differenet and your system might have its own signature, then the best approach to cable would be to choose the ones that are most transparent. And as it was said before, that can be better achived objectively rather than subjectively.
    That extension cord would be way better than the little wires all connected over a 70 foot run I have.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •