Skeptic, just so you know, you've been on my ignore list since you started your irrational outbursts in this topic/thread. That was the same point at which I contacted Chris. He's already warned you once that your behavior and irrational personal attacks will not be tolerated, but if you want to pretend or imagine that it's all drivel that's your prerogative. Chris has made it clear that he has no intent of letting it continue. I have no intention of reading inflammatory posts from people who only want to stir up trouble and then deny their activities when it's pointed out, so I block posts from the few who lack the social skills to carry on a civil conversation with others. The only reason I read your rebuttal to Chris is because his post was the result of my complaints about your posts, and I wanted to see what kind of excuses you'd come up with. I actually expected something a little more creative than a denial of the activities we've all observed, but I did expect you to continue with the personal attacks when you read my response. As a result, I haven't seen your response, and don't actually know whether or not you are continuing with the same bad behavior that you’ve been warned about. However, Chris says that your continued bashing of others will not be tolerated. If you think that's just drivel he'll probably have to prove you wrong. Do you really want to push until you force him to restrict your activities here? If so, be my guest, but while you finish up slamming Chris and his forum because he won't let you slam others the way you've been doing, don't expect me to be reading
/b your
drivel.

May I humbly suggest that you might be happier if you follow my lead, and also put my name on your blocked poster list. You obviously have no interest in what Chris wants to do with his forum, nor in my interests in helping him achieve his goals, so we have nothing to discuss.