Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 43
  1. #1
    AR Newbie Registered Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1

    Question Tube Versus SolidState

    I need to determine why I would or would not want tube or solidstate. Any comments?

  2. #2
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,188
    We have this war every few months almost on schedule. Here are some of the cases for both sides.

    Tubes sound more musical. The kind of distortion they create is more pleasing to the human ear. They don't have the shrillness of solid state amplifiers and have a "warm" sound. Class A tube amplifier although generally low in power have the best most musical sound available. OK, that's the gist of what the tube guys say.

    Solid state proponents say; transistor amplifiers sound clearer, have less noise and distortion, flatter frequency response, better more solid tighter bass, don't deteriorate with time, don't generate as much heat, are more reliable, cost less for the same amount of power.

    Have I left anything out?

    Which side am I on personally? I would say that there are good and bad examples of each. I've lived through both eras and personally I prefer solid state amplifiers. However, should someone wish to donate an old McIntosh or Marantz tube unit to my collection, you won't hear me complain.

  3. #3
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,720
    Quote Originally Posted by skeptic
    We have this war every few months almost on schedule. ..

    It's on schedule. He made it so
    mtrycrafts

  4. #4
    RGA
    RGA is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,539
    Agree with skeptic...except that you don't have to go back in time to find tube amplifiers. Hell some of those Macs probably cost 10 times now what they did then.

    Though McIntosh's has decided to return to making tubes agains since most of their Solid State amps have been rubbished in the press as poorly designed units. Their flagship line as I write this is all tube - this may rekindle the company and help put them back in the stores here who have been steadily dumping the company.

    Trouble is they've got some stiff tube amp makers to copete with.

    You know all the arguments are rather silly. GO and listen...do not be persuaded by technical arguments or the tube NEATO factor. Tubes have ergonomic draw backs. They're heavier usually 3-4 times as heavy and made out of solid steel with excellent parts and will easily outlast the rubbish you'll get from JAPAN. BUT, you won't get surround sound, you won't likely get a remote, you'll have to buy tubes every 2-10 years at $10.00 per tube roughly, they run hot, they are not as powerful even though a 30 watt tube amp typically sounds as loud as any 90watt SS amp, they require more attention such as biasing(the pain in the ass factors). SS usually is moe user friendly and has lots more inputs including SUbwoofer outputs and is easier to upgrade(say to add on a power amp).

    There is no cost advantage on initial purchase. You can buy a tube separates monoblock set-up for $400.00 which will drive 98% of speakers to deafening levels. You can do that with SS for that money all in one box.

    Depending on your speakers tubes can be a lot a fun, and I like the sound from the right set-ups. But what I like makes no difference go out and listen to a Jolida 302B or Antique Sound Labs AQ1003DT versus the NAD C370 an integrate that is rated to 1kilowatt at 1ohm. You tell us which amp you liked better. For me with the speakers I used back then the Nad was grating disc after disc compared to the tubes. The Nad may be more accurate - if so they need to change the definition IMO. Your opinion may be the exact opposite.

  5. #5
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    436
    I have heard that some companies have designed integrated an auto-bias thing onto their tube amps. Don't know if this is true though. Probably costs a lot more than normal tube amps even if it is, so as a starter system, it's probably not a good idea.

  6. #6
    Suspended topspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,717

    Talking Don't forget digital amps while you're at it

    You knew that was coming, right guys? LOL

  7. #7
    Forum Regular FLZapped's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    740

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by royvickynbrady
    I need to determine why I would or would not want tube or solidstate. Any comments?

    Well, tubes generate far more heat, making them way less energy efficient. (You pay for it twice if you have air conditioning) They usually have more distortion, lower damping factors, higher noise floors. Otherwise, they are great.

    -Bruce

  8. #8
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,188
    They are also far less reliable. The MTBF (mean time between failure) of a well made solid state amplifier is far greater than the MTBF for a well made tube amplifier. They also don't start to deteriorate as soon as you turn them on. The most unstable performer I can think of is a tube amplifier with no feedback. You'd wonder if it would ever perform the same way twice. BTW, IMO, the main shortcoming of any tube amplifier is the output transformer. Contrary to the claims of the author of the poorly written paper in PCTower's thread about must read, eddy current and hysterisis losses as well as imperfect mutual transconductance coupling is the major reason why tube amplifiers have their characteristeric sound. And except for the rare OTL Futterman clones such as NYAL they all have it.

  9. #9
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    583
    What kind of tube or solid state equipment are you intrested in? Are talking about an amp, linestage, or both?
    Remember, different isn't always better, but it is different.
    Keep things as simple as possible, but not too simple.
    Let your ears decide for you!

  10. #10
    Silence of the spam Site Moderator Geoffcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,326
    Quote Originally Posted by royvickynbrady
    I need to determine why I would or would not want tube or solidstate. Any comments?
    Well I don't smell any smoke yet but here it goes;

    The only way YOU can determine whether you want tube or SS is to listen for yourself.

    I will tell you though that your not going to find any tube gear in the BestBuy/Circut City type stores to demo, while you may find some decent SS gear there.
    Audio;
    Ming Da MC34-AB 75wpc
    PS Audio Classic 250. 500wpc into 4 ohms.
    PS Audio 4.5 preamp,
    Marantz 6170 TT Shure M97e cart.
    Arcam Alpha 9 CD.- 24 bit dCS Ring DAC.
    Magnepan 3.6r speakers Oak/black,

  11. #11
    RGA
    RGA is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,539
    You see there is so much misinfromation because most people have not heard tubes in 20+ years and this thread is obvious.

    Yes there are tube amps that require no biasing whatsoever. My tube headphone amp for one. It can also be used as a preamp because it is so quiet that you can run a 1/4 pin to RCA jack adapter cord ($10.00 at radio Shack and gold plated to boot).

    Then there are in fact No feedback SET amps from Audio Note which have a different kind of tube with a gauranteed life of 100,000 hours or 11 years 24 hours a day. No biasing required all Single ended.

    The supposedly low powered amps with their speakers will make you plenty deaf and will dig down to 12hz without a sub -6db provided they're placed in corners - with absolutely impeccable distortion numbers.

    The $99.00 Wave 8 monoblocks from ASL require no biasing either - nor did their $300.00 matching premap. Actually to save money people recommend the $149.00 Bottle Head Foreplay KIT. So for $347.00 you could get into tubes and monoblock separates no less. The 8s are no longer made because that was more a stunt to get the ASL name out there....but some dealers still have some. They did a nice job of driving the $15,000.00 flagship Tannoys. But my dealer replaced the Tannoys, Martin Logan and B&W top of the lines because none of them could compete with Audio Note. It would seem all the advertising in the world and desiner looks can't match a listening session.

  12. #12
    DMK
    DMK is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    332
    Quote Originally Posted by RGA
    It would seem all the advertising in the world and desiner looks can't match a listening session.
    Likewise, all the measurements in the world can't match a listening session... unless music is less important to someone than blindly following the numbers.

  13. #13
    Forum Regular Arch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    48
    I haven't been playing around with gears for that long, but I have already noticed that tube amps are rising in popularity once again (according to a couple of dealers).

    One contributing factor is the invasion of "cheap" tube amps from Asia - mostly from China. 30wpc units selling for around $1000 - $2000 cdn, their looks ranges from decent to gorgous, and sounds really, really good.

    My main audio pimp sells one of these "cheapie" unit that is cloes to $1200, and on average he moves 2 every week....

    Reliability aside (I doubt these companies carry warranties - but a good reliable shop will usually offset that), I wonder if any of you folks have thoughts / experiences with these bargins.

  14. #14
    RGA
    RGA is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,539
    Antique Sound Labs is a Chinese maker that has been around since aroun 1990.

    Their amplifiers come with 5 year warranties. Name me a receiver maker that has a 5 year warranty? Why can't SONY offer a five year warranty?

    Ahh that's right - their solid state stuff is completely indferior in every way...build quality and certainly sound quality.

    It would seem most people who actually listen to the gear would far rather put up with minor inconveniences if they get better sound and value.

    My dealer has begun once again carrying tubes and he was the one who hated tubes in the early to late 1980s...they have improved dramatically are reasonably priced and they get carried.

  15. #15
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,188
    Before you get too absorbed in the love fest the mutual admiration society of vacuum tube amplifier fans are holding, it's time to interject a little reality.

    Whether you are a tube fan or not, it is a fact that you would be hard pressed to find another area of electronics where the preferences of at least some of the users flies in the face of the way most of the engineers and manufacturers see it and the prevalent theories they learn and use to create their products. Many tube proponents have rejected all of the engineering design criteria and performance meausrements engineers use to judge the performance of audio equipment because they say that it doesn't correlate with what they hear. So the market for tube amplifiers which was nearly dead for most of the last 40 or so years has been rekindled by a niche looking for what most main stream manufacturers would call esoteric products. However, the big boys, the ones who used to actually manufacture the tubes themselves, RCA, GE, Sylvania, even Telefunken have never gone back into the business of making them. There have been no new vacuum tube designs in about 40 years. Many of the people who manufacture these tubes now are of highly dubious skill in making precision parts that consistantly perform properly. Furthermore, most of the designs, the claims of the manufacturers not withstanding are old reworked versions of designs known 40, 50, even 60 years ago. At best they have been reworked or tweaked to a minor degree. The kind of parts which were so common for manufacturing tube sets 50 years ago such as electrolytic capacitors with very high voltage ratings, transformers with suitable windings for biasing vacuum tubes must now be procured from a relatively small source because the rest of the electronics industry has retooled and these once common parts are now exceedingly rare and costly.

    You buy at your own risk. There are thousands of products currently out there. Many thousands more if you consider all of the older discontinued models. If you are a true died in the wool audiophile, one can almost guarantee that whatever you buy you sooner or later won't like it and when the novelty wears off, you will become disillusioned and look for something else to buy in its place. Very few are entirely happy for any extended time with what they already own. Another objective truth is that the nirvana they seek rarely if ever exists.

    The fact is that vacuum tubes begin to deteriorate from the minute they are first turned on due to the heat. Normally they age so slowly that the decline in their performance is imperceptable. However, this depends to a certain extent on negative feedback which compensates for these changes among other things. But many new amplifier designers have rejected negative feedback because it is not in their lexicon of what sounds good.

    The purchase of a low power class A vacuum tube amplifier will necessarily restrict you to a small segment of the speaker market where efficiency is a major concern. That or you will have to adjust your expectations to modest volume levels. Depending on your musical tastes, and the size and acoustics of your listening room, this may or may not be OK.

    The high end rolloff exhibited by many vacuum tube amplifiers because of the limitations of their output transformers may be useful in offsetting the shrill sounding loudspeakers audiophiles initially prefer especially since they have rejected equalizaton, driver level controls, tone controls and filters, and all other manner of modifying the frequency response of audio systems. The only other method they accept is to look for wires with bizzarre inductance/capacitance characteristics which also act as filters of one sort or another.

    Cavaet Emptor, buyer beware.

  16. #16
    Silence of the spam Site Moderator Geoffcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,326
    Tubes are like the Sushi of the audio world. Some people love them, others think the're just bait.

    For me a good tube amp is like an old jag; fun to drive but you would want to live with one.

    Give me a Z06 Corvette anyday!
    Audio;
    Ming Da MC34-AB 75wpc
    PS Audio Classic 250. 500wpc into 4 ohms.
    PS Audio 4.5 preamp,
    Marantz 6170 TT Shure M97e cart.
    Arcam Alpha 9 CD.- 24 bit dCS Ring DAC.
    Magnepan 3.6r speakers Oak/black,

  17. #17
    RGA
    RGA is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,539
    one not to add to Skeptic's statements. First 10 watts is enough to drive 90+% of the speakers available.

    The fact is 88db 8ohm is a sensitive speaker. 90db is loud 2 watts will get you 90db at meter. 10 to be on the safe side.

    Also tubes today are consider far more reliable despite being made in more dubious countries Tube prices are dirt cheap http://www.thetubestore.com/

    BTW - I'm not a blind tube follower because I myself went SS even though I was in the market for tubes...it's a case by case basis - it just happened to be that a tube based system is the best system I have heard over way more costly SS based systems.

    Some people will spend $250,000.00 on sports car someone else will spend on a classic car some on a luxury car and some are green peace folk who will take the bus...the latter probably has the most powerful engine is sorta like a chauffer to boot. It's personal preference and perception.

    What's lost is the music most good systems of either design will do a good job of getting the music across. The rest is nitpicky minutae.

  18. #18
    DMK
    DMK is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    332
    "you would be hard pressed to find another area of electronics where the preferences of at least some of the users flies in the face of the way most of the engineers and manufacturers see it and the prevalent theories they learn and use to create their products."

    Very true. Some tube amps sound that way - colored, rolled off, soft bass. Many don't.

    "There have been no new vacuum tube designs in about 40 years."

    And there are untold numbers of new transistor designs in the last 20 years, or at least that's the impression I get from your statement. Fact is, amps are amps and are basically differentiated by sound and/or by their driving components, not by some
    earth shattering new design.

    "If you are a true died in the wool audiophile, one can almost guarantee that whatever you buy you sooner or later won't like it and when the novelty wears off, you will become disillusioned and look for something else to buy in its place. "

    That's true of SS fans as well... or of a collector of just about anything.

    "Another objective truth is that the nirvana they seek rarely if ever exists."

    I agree. But many of them feel they take a step closer with each upgrade. Not all audiophiles are dissatisfied. I own a tubed pre, a tubed power and a tubed headphone amp (formerly doing duty as an integrated). I've owned them all for at least 4 years, the head amp for almost 6.

    "The fact is that vacuum tubes begin to deteriorate from the minute they are first turned on due to the heat. "

    Please explain how transistors avoid wearing out and can you also speculate on what caused my old SS amp to die after a dozen years? There weren't hidden tubes in there, were there?

    No one is arguing that tubes are a PITA or that they have other limitations in certain applications. Some tube amps suck. But many do not.

    Many people purchase an amplifier to simply amplify the signal. If that's you, by all means purchase a solid state amp. But many other people want to buy the best sounding amp they can find. For those people, I would suggest they test out modern tubed amps before they decide. I hear of and personally know many, many people who have upgraded to tubes from SS. I know of not a single one who has gone the other way in the last 3 decades. That's a telling argument, IMHO, much more telling than some nebulous measurements or discussions about architecture.

  19. #19
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,188
    "Please explain how transistors avoid wearing out and can you also speculate on what caused my old SS amp to die after a dozen years? There weren't hidden tubes in there, were there? "

    Transistors themselves don't wear out. If their crystaline structure breaks down even slightly, they will almost certainly undergo catastrophic failure. That is why manufacturers take the extraordinary precautions they do to protect them. When your amplifier failed, unless it was abused in some way, the failure was due to failure of another component. That it not to say that the initial failure didn't take out some transistors with it but that was not the primary cause. Capacitors are the most frequent culprits. Sometimes the power transformer fails. I just had an equalizer lose a power transformer after 20 years of reliable service and no replacement is available.

    I personally gave up on tube amplifiers around 1968. I got tired of their less than clear sound. I've heard some very good tube amplifiers such as NYAL but I have no intention of going back to tubes. I like many of the amplifiers most audiophiles reject and I'm thrilled that there are so many of them on the used market at giveaway prices. If you want an excellent amplifier for a two channel sound system, consider a used Marantz receiver of about 70 wpc or greater in mint condition. You will get a very reliable piece of equipment that performs excellently by most people's standards for a fraction of the cost of a new unit on nominally comparable power.

  20. #20
    DMK
    DMK is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    332
    Quote Originally Posted by skeptic
    "Please explain how transistors avoid wearing out and can you also speculate on what caused my old SS amp to die after a dozen years? There weren't hidden tubes in there, were there? "

    Transistors themselves don't wear out. If their crystaline structure breaks down even slightly, they will almost certainly undergo catastrophic failure. That is why manufacturers take the extraordinary precautions they do to protect them. When your amplifier failed, unless it was abused in some way, the failure was due to failure of another component. That it not to say that the initial failure didn't take out some transistors with it but that was not the primary cause. Capacitors are the most frequent culprits. Sometimes the power transformer fails. I just had an equalizer lose a power transformer after 20 years of reliable service and no replacement is available.

    I personally gave up on tube amplifiers around 1968. I got tired of their less than clear sound. I've heard some very good tube amplifiers such as NYAL but I have no intention of going back to tubes. I like many of the amplifiers most audiophiles reject and I'm thrilled that there are so many of them on the used market at giveaway prices. If you want an excellent amplifier for a two channel sound system, consider a used Marantz receiver of about 70 wpc or greater in mint condition. You will get a very reliable piece of equipment that performs excellently by most people's standards for a fraction of the cost of a new unit on nominally comparable power.
    So if I read you correctly, you're saying that both tube and transistor amps can have reliability issues, a statement to which I agree.

    I have little doubt, based on the ones I've heard, that tube amps from 1968 had less than clear sound. But I find the gap between modern tube amps and SS amps being bridged, particularly over the last 5 or so years. A good tube amp sounds more similar to a good SS amp than different, the main difference being in a sonic quality that I can only describe as "life", which the tube amp usually has and the SS amp doesn't. But that's just me.

    Thanks for the advice on Marantz - I currently own a Marantz pro CD recorder and after literally thousands of copies (I archived some 800 pre-recorded cassette tapes to CDR, not to mention several CD copies and a few LP's), it's still going strong. But my next foray into the equipment ranks will likely be surround sound for music, should SACD take off... or whatever format comes out in surround. I've liked what I've heard so far but I need to coax the manufacturer of my speakers into making a center channel. So far, he's being difficult....

  21. #21
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,188
    "So if I read you correctly, you're saying that both tube and transistor amps can have reliability issues"

    In Pilot Radio's first foray into solid state, every amplifier they shipped out blew up after eight hours of use. At one point, according to my sources, they were coming back faster than they were going out.

    Didn't you read the thread some months back about someone's Krell amplifier which kept blowing up. They'd fix it, return it and after playing OK for a while would blow up again. The output stage kept failing. Finally the problem was traced to a cracked electrolytic capacitor. Often, a component failure causes a cascading series of events. Unless you get to the root cause, it can and usually does happen again. There is no known aging process for transistors themselves. The atoms are locked tightly in their crystal matrices and are not likely to drift around. Absent damaging effects of excessive heat or ionizing radiation, transistors should have no problem lasting for hundreds of years. Of course simulations, tests, and mathematical analysis can only predict what will happen, the real test is the test of time.

    Tubes begin deteriorating from the moment they are made. Even with no use, the glass envelope will allow some air to enter very slowly and it will ultimately be significant over an extended period of time. The "getter" inside some tubes will only absorb so much. Before vacuum tubes were installed in repeaters in the Atlantic Cable, they had to prove themselves reliable by giving 25 years of continuous service without a problem. I don't have any statistical info but many tubes fail for the same reason transistors fail and that is because another component failed first. However, because of the enormous heat generated by tubes, this is far more likely over an extended period. Users of tube amplifiers are encouraged to test and replace the output tubes periodically. Once upon a time, this was a minor inconvenience but today, many of these tubes are very expensive.

    Beware the Chinese made KT 88. My reports from friends a few years back were that they did not perform well. That may have changed since. You are now forced to buy tubes which may have been made in Russia or Serbia. Svetlana is one source commonly used. Luckily for audio fans, electronics technology in the USSR lagged about 30 years or more behind the US.

    Most tube amplifiers of the past didn't take kindly to operating without a connected load. I don't know what the situation is today but I wouldn't be surprised if it is still true. On the other hand, opearating a ss amp without a load is not a problem.

  22. #22
    Suspended topspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,717

    Pardon the interruption...

    of your rather passionate debate, but has anyone else noticed that our esteemed thread starter has yet to chime in on this?

    Why are you guys even bothering?

    Geez, we go 'round and 'round with this thing every couple of months, like Skep noted, and for what? Because you like to debate?

    This topic is as inane as the planar/'stat vs. dynamic or acoustic suspension vs. bass reflex debates.

  23. #23
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    436
    Topspeed,
    What's even more is that it sounds almost exactly like the other debates.
    Similar comments. Similar evidence. Similar everything.

  24. #24
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,188
    What is arcane or esoteric in many hobbies is often fun. It makes the people who shop for them, buy them, sell them, use them, admire them, feel that they have made a discovery and are among the priveleged insiders who know where the real gems are burried. In a world where mass production means low cost and limited production or merely finding and restoring antiques means high cost, the fancy pricetags associated with this class of products can be considerable and nobody wants to feel or admit that they have been had. You can call people today almost anything and they often won't even flinch at the worst insults but suggest that they are stupid and their blood will boil.

    Vacuum tubes, vinyl phonograph records, class A amplifiers, high efficiency horn speakers, moving coil phonograph cartridges, these things have been around in one form or another for 50, 60, even 70 years but most were long forgotten by all but a few until their recent revival. Throw in some exotic cables and you have a perfect description of the modern audiophile's high end sound system. They cling to it like a religion and heaven help you if you say anything bad about any of it.

  25. #25
    DMK
    DMK is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    332
    [QUOTE=topspeed]

    Why are you guys even bothering? [/QUOTE

    Because some else might be reading the thread, as you did. That someone might read one side of the issue and be swayed without knowing the whole issue. If you feel it's "inane", I'm afraid you don't have much of a grasp of the issue. Yes, tubes and solid state amps are a preference. But it is not true that one is "right" or accurate and the other wrong and inaccurate. That's the part I'm debating. I will certainly never convince Skeptic of anything but perhaps a newbie to tubes will take note.

    If this debate is a problem for you, please feel free to skip over it. It's a public board and you're free to read or not read whatever you like.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 51
    Last Post: 03-29-2004, 08:13 PM
  2. new to the world of tube amps, help?
    By bhd812 in forum Amps/Preamps
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-17-2004, 04:46 PM
  3. here's a really cool tube website!
    By trollgirl in forum General Audio
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-10-2004, 02:26 PM
  4. Supply Tube Audio Parts at good price
    By abcngby in forum Amps/Preamps
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-07-2004, 04:35 AM
  5. Cleaning a picture tube
    By yakkosmurf in forum Home Theater/Video
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-08-2003, 06:42 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •