Results 1 to 25 of 28

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Forum Regular paul_pci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,246
    The mainstream companies such as Yamaha, Denon, and HK will load up their receivers with more bells and whistles than guys such as yourself need or want. Then, what's a guy to do, who wants occasional surround sound, quality music, but can do without all the fancy features? First than all those mainstream manufacturers because they have ratcheted up the pressure for high end manufacturers to produce five-channel receivers that are high on quaity and low on unnecessary features. Check out: Rotel, Arcam, B&K, and even Marantz. I'm sure there are others. If you've got the money, I'm sure they have just what you're looking for.

  2. #2
    Forum Regular N. Abstentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,671
    Receiver. With only $1000 to spend you won't even be able to get a preamp (maybe unless you go used) and you'd still need at least another $500 for a used 5 channel amp.

  3. #3
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by N. Abstentia
    Receiver. With only $1000 to spend you won't even be able to get a preamp (maybe unless you go used) and you'd still need at least another $500 for a used 5 channel amp.
    OK. The budget is flexible, though.

    Given that I'm so new to this... What, really, is a preamp? Something with all the needed electronics, inputs, outputs, etc. but no power to drive the speakers, correct? I didn't realize they were that expensive. How about getting a cheap ($300-500) AV receiver to handle all the electronic stuff (i.e., a preamp) and then adding amps for power?

  4. #4
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by paul_pci
    The mainstream companies such as Yamaha, Denon, and HK will load up their receivers with more bells and whistles than guys such as yourself need or want. Then, what's a guy to do, who wants occasional surround sound, quality music, but can do without all the fancy features? First than all those mainstream manufacturers because they have ratcheted up the pressure for high end manufacturers to produce five-channel receivers that are high on quaity and low on unnecessary features. Check out: Rotel, Arcam, B&K, and even Marantz. I'm sure there are others. If you've got the money, I'm sure they have just what you're looking for.
    OK, good idea. If companies like those foucs more on sound quality and less on gizmos, that could be good for me.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Will this vintage receiver play that funky music?
    By nightflier in forum Amps/Preamps
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-11-2005, 08:53 PM
  2. BUYING A New AV Receiver? Let me help and so can you!!
    By nick4433 in forum Home Theater/Video
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-12-2004, 12:28 PM
  3. Problem with receiver marantz sr5400ose
    By stereophonicfan in forum Home Theater/Video
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-27-2004, 06:21 PM
  4. is this receiver underpowered?!!!.....suggestions...
    By CyberStoic in forum General Audio
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-12-2004, 07:51 PM
  5. Question regarding SACD connections
    By Tyler in forum General Audio
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-29-2004, 05:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •