Sir T, fact or fiction

Printable View

  • 08-22-2010, 04:08 AM
    Feanor
    Is all this really necessary?
  • 08-22-2010, 04:42 AM
    Geoffcin
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Feanor
    Is all this really necessary?

    Think of this like AR's litter box.

    It's not pretty, but better than having the ****e all over the other boards.
  • 08-22-2010, 08:16 AM
    3-LockBox
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Mr Peabody
    Another problem of yours, you always say "this is it" or "that is all" but you can't resist..... You remind me of Roger Rabit when he was hiding and trying to resist replying to Shave and A Haircut.

    Now that is funny :lol::lol::lol:
  • 08-22-2010, 08:55 AM
    Sir Terrence the Terrible
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by 3-LockBox
    Now that is funny :lol::lol::lol:

    Yeah, you resort to comments like that when a giant hole has been shot in your entire rant.
  • 08-22-2010, 02:10 PM
    3LB
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Sir Terrence the Terrible
    Yeah, you resort to comments like that when a giant hole has been shot in your entire rant.

    no I don't
  • 08-23-2010, 06:32 AM
    GMichael
    I find Sir T’s colorful outburst to be fun to read. Maybe he gets a little rough around the edges, but that’s part of his charm. That goes for everyone else around here. I enjoy reading the dynamic exchanges between many of our members here. It was one of the things that kept me coming back every day when I first joined. It’s also one of the things that have dwindled off over the years. If you ask me, we need more spirited conversations, not less. I’ve learned a ton reading these threads. Seeing both sides of a point of view is critical to really learning it. But maybe some of the name calling could be curbed huh? That can lead to hurt feelings and the loss of good members.
  • 08-23-2010, 12:30 PM
    3LockBox
    Are there really members here who've left because someone called them a name or was abrasive? I wouldn't give anyone that level of control over me.
  • 08-23-2010, 12:37 PM
    Mr Peabody
    I don't see Nightflier or Groundbeef around any more. It's one thing to attack some of us who are used to it or wouldn't be surprised but we all should go easy on new posters. I'd like to keep AR alive and thriving, harsh replies and name calling is a sure way to turn off new posters. I'm sure that guy in the Dual Center Channel exchange won't be back.
  • 08-23-2010, 01:00 PM
    Sir Terrence the Terrible
    :sad: :17: ^^^^^^^
  • 08-23-2010, 01:12 PM
    3LockBox
    I dunno Mr P, I like to think there more than just one guy to correspond with here than Sir T. I wonder how those who are put off will react to the Terrences they encounter on a daily basis. They're in all walks of life. They're on every work crew, every office floor, every sound studio, every sandlot and playground. They're everywhere, all over the world. Sometimes it makes for an interesting discussion, sometimes it makes for an inflated military budget. You can't always meet aggression with aggression. Sometimes you gotta rope-a-dope while the other dude finishes beating his chest.
  • 08-23-2010, 02:50 PM
    Auricauricle
    (Looks around, under tables and chairs) Isn't SVI around here, somewhere? Thought I heard some whining... :biggrin5:

    http://caninetrainingtoday.com/image...1767XSmall.jpg
  • 08-23-2010, 03:14 PM
    ForeverAutumn
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by 3LockBox
    Are there really members here who've left because someone called them a name or was abrasive? I wouldn't give anyone that level of control over me.

    Billy Sherwood.



    (yeah, I know it wasn't here. But it was such a grand exit :lol:)
  • 08-23-2010, 05:01 PM
    3LockBox
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by ForeverAutumn
    Billy Sherwood.



    (yeah, I know it wasn't here. But it was such a grand exit :lol:)

    that's awesome! :lol::lol::lol:

    think we should invite some of these guys over to PE - they'd hardly stand out there! :lol:
  • 08-24-2010, 02:31 PM
    Sir Terrence the Terrible
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Auricauricle
    (Looks around, under tables and chairs) Isn't SVI around here, somewhere? Thought I heard some whining... :biggrin5:

    http://caninetrainingtoday.com/image...1767XSmall.jpg

    :lol::lol::lol::lol:
  • 09-22-2010, 09:24 AM
    Pat D
    My ears are burning . . .
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Mr Peabody
    From all your earlier posts I thought your cables were all Monoprice and zip cord. In the same thread you, PatD & theaudiohobby all come against tubed gear yet none of you can discuss one single brand that sounds good, or bad, or why, what you liked or didn't like. The reason you do this is so we can't substantiate our suspicions you are full of ****.
    .

    I have not come out against tube gear. One can get very good sound using tube gear, but of course, one can get very good sound using SS gear, too. I have good reasons for preferring solid state gear but sound quality isn't one of them: reliability, low maintenance, low output impedance, flat frequency response into speaker loads, stable performance over long periods of time. Also, most speakers are designed with a low impedance source in mind--true, there are tube amps which have a lowish output impedance, but the ones I have seen are expensive, and should sound about the same as a decent SS amp. Maybe those are not very important considerations to you, but they are to me.