Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    17

    Will adding this Sub help or hinder my Setup?

    My dad offered to give me a Polk Audio PSW110 Subwoofer he only used for 1 week for free.


    Current Setup:
    Front: Paradigm Reference Studio 100s V.2 (around $2,000 a pair)
    Center: Paradigm Reference Stuio CC
    Surround: Older Polk Audios
    No Subwoofer atm
    Receiver: Onkyo TX-DS797 ($900 Receiver in 2004)


    Free Subwoofer
    Polk Audio PSW110 ($250 msrp) 10" 100w RMS


    Worth adding, or stay 2.0/5.0 channel for now?

    EDIT: If I use this free sub, I plan on buying a Behringer Feedback Destroyer (Parametric Equalizer)
    Last edited by mademperor; 01-05-2010 at 01:00 PM.

  2. #2
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    I personally think it would have a tough time keeping up with your receiver but it may at lower volume or if the room is small. For free though I'd give it a try.

  3. #3
    Forum Regular blackraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,421
    The Studio 100's put out some nice bass. I don't think it will add much to 2ch audio but for HT use it will add to your enjoyment, Just don't turn it up too loud or else it will sound muddy and boomy.
    Pass Labs X250 amp, BAT Vk-51se Preamp,
    Thorens TD-145 TT, Bellari phono preamp, Nagaoka MP-200 Cartridge
    Magnepan QR1.6 speakers
    Luxman DA-06 DAC
    Van Alstine Ultra Plus Hybrid Tube DAC
    Dual Martin Logan Original Dynamo Subs
    Parasound A21 amp
    Vintage Luxman T-110 tuner
    Magnepan MMG's, Grant Fidelity DAC-11, Class D CDA254 amp
    Monitor Audio S1 speakers, PSB B6 speakers
    Vintage Technic's Integrated amp
    Music Hall 25.2 CDP
    Adcom GFR 700 AVR
    Cables- Cardas, Silnote, BJC
    Velodyne CHT 8 sub

  4. #4
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Toronto CAN
    Posts
    144
    As blackraven mentioned, the Studio 100s will have very good low frequency output. Try setting all your speakers to 'large', this will keep only the LFE material going to the sub. When setting up, you may find it useful to set the crossover frequency very low, perhaps as low as it goes (60Hz). This will save the amp from having to juice frequencies the 100s are already well-capable of.

    Setup. Listen. Decide. It's free.
    Source: Musical Fidelity A5CD
    Pre: Stevens & Billington TVC
    Power: Heathkit W4; Tung-Sol 6SN7GTB splitter, '55 Sylvania 6SN7GTA driver, Russian 6P3SE outputs
    Speakers: Reference 3A Veena
    Interconnect: Tara Labs RSC Air 1
    Speaker Cable: Tara Labs RSC Prime 1000
    Power Cables: Furutech 314 with Oyaide 079 connectors
    Rack: Rack of Silence
    Room: well treated with panel absorbers

  5. #5
    Charm Thai™
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    865
    I agree with raven and boredom. My guess is that the Paradigms would handle the lower frequencies better by themselves than the Polk sub would. I think it would take a higher quality sub to make it worth your while to run it under your Paradigms but you may as well give it a try. Your ears will be the judge.

  6. #6
    Retro Modernist 02audionoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,908
    According to the specs, the PSW110 can go as low as 32 Hz. It might be worthwhile, as long as you keep the sub crossover low and the sub output low.

  7. #7
    Forum Regular harley .guy07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Springfield, Mo
    Posts
    1,594
    I myself agree but I would probably only use it for home theater because for music I would say your 100's should put out very clean tight bass and I am afraid that the polk sub might just muddy things up and not be able to keep up with the 100's for music quality and overall clean output capability. But what the hell for free I would play around with it and see what it can do

    Marantz SR5008(HT)
    Nu Force P8 Preamp (2 channel)
    Pass Labs X150.5(2 channel)
    Adcom 545 mk2 power amp(rear channel amp)
    Spatial Audio M3 Turbo S Mains Speakers
    Dayton 8" HO custom sealed subwoofer(2 channel)
    Yamaha NS-c444 center channel
    Emotiva ERD-1 surround speakers
    JBL e250p subwoofer highly modified
    Samsung 46" LED TV
    OPPO BDP-83 blue ray/multi format player
    ps-audio NuWave dac (2 channel)
    Dell I660 music server running fidelizer windows 8 audio optimizer
    PS Audio Quintet power center



  8. #8
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    If you will be connecting the sub to the LFE output on the receiver a very low frequency cut off setting will not be correct. When connected to LFE the sub should either be set to "bypass" to bypass the internal crossover or all the way up if no bypass available. The LFE is the .1 and contains content that will not be in the other channels. Then the crossover is controlled inside the receiver Many of the receivers I've seen won't allow crossover adjustment on sub. Usually when one of the other speakers are set to "small" you can set that crossover and everything below that point will go to sub, that's a good reason to keep all that can handle it set to large. The LFE (.1) crossover, or response, is mixed into the soundtrack.

    With this being said, I don't use my sub or processor for music, other than DVD or BD, so things are probably different when setting up for music. Hopefully the receiver will allow for both set ups.

  9. #9
    Retro Modernist 02audionoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,908
    If the sub can't be connected in such a way that it stays out of the way of the superior front speakers, it seems like a bad idea. In a music setup, a sub can fill in some very low frequencies and add a little value even if it's not that great of a sub.
    Last edited by 02audionoob; 01-07-2010 at 09:29 PM.

  10. #10
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    17
    So I have the Polk Audio PSW110 subwoofer now, but I'm unsure if it is a benefit or hinderence to my system.
    (See 1st post for system specs)
    I have a Galaxy Digital SPL meter & Tripod I've been using to take some measurements (I also have a Behringer BFD, that I have not used yet)

    I tried some Test Tones, I set my sub equal with my mains @ 50hz and ran tones from 28hz to 125hz and compared SPL with and without the sub.


    Tone - 2.0 / 2.1
    28hz - w/o 75 with sub 63
    31hz - w/o 74 with sub 67
    36hz - w/o 74 with sub 71
    40hz - w/o 74 with sub 70
    50hz - w/o 75 with sub 75
    Starting tone, I set both equal at this tone.
    63hz - w/o 77 with sub 75
    71hz - w/o 79 with sub 74
    80hz - w/o 86 with sub 77
    89hz - w/o 77 with sub 70
    100hz - w/o 68 with sub 70
    111hz - w/o 67 with sub 66
    125hz - w/o 75 with sub 71


    Thoughts on those readings?
    Are there other tests I can run to determine if the sub is helping or not?
    (I did a listening subjective test, and it sounds similar lol)

    --Using REW with my sub I can see the SPL drops around 30hz with this sub depending on where I am in the room. I have not used REW with my mains, nor do I really know how lol.
    Last edited by mademperor; 01-12-2010 at 05:55 PM.

  11. #11
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    It looks like you must have set the mains to "small" when doing 2.1. You should keep the mains in "large". 2.0 should be at least equal, I don't see how you could get a lower SPL unless mains were set to small or maybe the sub is out of phase with the mains.

  12. #12
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Peabody
    It looks like you must have set the mains to "small" when doing 2.1. You should keep the mains in "large". 2.0 should be at least equal, I don't see how you could get a lower SPL unless mains were set to small or maybe the sub is out of phase with the mains.
    It's very possible that the location of the speakers vs sub in his room could account for the differences he displayed.

    Had he set the mains to small I'd expect the mains to show much lower SPL below 50Hz than he experienced.

    I've experienced setting full-range speakers to "small" and crossing over to a good sub can noticeably improve imaging, soundstage and midrange performance (really anything above above 150 Hz or so up to 2k-3k Hz) of the full range speakers - but would only recommend doing this if the sub is equal or better than the speakers at reproducing bass. You reduce excursion and distortion which has material affect on pace and timing and resolution (among other benefits). The trade-off is the difficulty incorporating a sub into a speaker system - it's not easy and if not done properly will introduce problems that offset these other gains.

    That said, I'm not 100% convinced that mademperor's sub is going to be as accurate as his speakers in this case...not by any stretch. That sub isn't known for its musical accuracy - at least not at the same level as his speakers - I'd just run the Studio's full range for music and leave the sub for HT duty - or at least set the receiver's crossover to 50 Hz or less if possible...

  13. #13
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    17
    I took some new measurements in response to some of the replies. I still the Fronts & Sub equal @ 50hz but increased SPL to 80db this time.
    SPL meter used is a Galaxy 140 on a Tripod.
    The crossover is NOT adjustable other then changing Fronts from Small to Large when a Sub is enabled.

    I did a comparison now with Fronts set to Both Small & Large and Phase 0 and Phase 180
    (See my 1st post for system details and last post for previous values)

    Freq - No Sub//Sub-Frt Sm // Lg ## Sm//Lg
    --------------------- Phase 180 ## Phase 0
    028hz - w/o 79 with sub 67 // 67 ## 68 // 68
    031hz - w/o 77 with sub 71 // 71 ## 74 // 74
    036hz - w/o 78 with sub 75 // 75 ## 77 // 77
    040hz - w/o 77 with sub 75 // 75 ## 79 // 79

    050hz - w/o 80 with sub 80 // 80 ## 84 // 84
    063hz - w/o 82 with sub 81 // 80 ## 86 // 86
    071hz - w/o 91 with sub 79 // 79 ## 87 // 87
    080hz - w/o 82 with sub 82 // 82 ## 94 // 94
    089hz - w/o 82 with sub 78 // 78 ## 87 // 87
    100hz - w/o 73 with sub 68 // 68 ## 80 // 80
    111hz - w/o 67 with sub 72 // 72 ## 67 // 67
    125hz - w/o 79 with sub 76 // 76 ## 79 // 79


    From these numbers I suspect:

    --Phase 0 is where I want to be since it equals a SPL gain at all Freq
    --Setting my Fronts to either Small or Large is irrelevant for me, maybe this setting is broken.
    --This sub sucks compared to my mains, since it won't go as deep as the mains. (See rew in my last post)

    Thoughts?
    Should I keep this sub, or go w/o?
    Any other Objective tests I can do?

  14. #14
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    Forget the sub. Set to large is what I thought we should see. Which means the sub really isn't doing anything. I guess some of those wild dips/peaks at certain freqs must be room effect. I have to give you an "A" for research.

  15. #15
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    Eeek. No xo in the receiver - that brings back memories - several years ago most crossed over at 90 Hz or so...that was brutal. There's something going on in your room or the frequency you are matching with your mains is in the middle of a nasty peak because even at a 12 dB/octave crossover you should notice a waaaaay bigger difference than 4 or 5 dB between setting the speaker small vs large. In my system at 30 Hz for example, my mains are down over 30 dB when set to small vs what they're at when set to large.

    There's no nice way for me to put this - that sub is not very good for music, and is just not in the same ballpark as your studios. Those were made to compliment smaller, entry level bookshelf Polk speakers, not big Studio 100's.

  16. #16
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    17
    I bought a SVS PC12-NSD

    Goodbye PSW110 Polk Audio. It's been fun, but you were pathetic



    http://www.svsound.com/products-sub-cyl-pc12_nsd.cfm

  17. #17
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    Guess you don't mess around. Enjoy your new toy!!!

  18. #18
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    You'll love that baby.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •