Subwoofer for Reciever without Sub connections

[AudioBack]

I can't believe I haven't been reported for use of foul language. You guys could have kicked me off way before now. This must be because you really don't want me to go. Ehhh... I was going to leave you guys alone on your useless little forum domain, but I see now that you guys just need something to do with your worthless lives sitting on the computer all day and night. So, I'll be around. I'm sure you'll be looking for my posts so you can run them into the ground. Just remember to to a break from typing once and a while. I bet your parents miss you spending all that time in your rooms and all. But seriously Markw, what did you do in the AUDIO profession that gave you so much experience? How long did you do it? How old are you? You must be pretty old if you were doing this since before I was just a stain.

[Resident Loser]

I can't believe I haven't been reported for use of foul language. You guys could have kicked me off way before now. This must be because you really don't want me to go. Ehhh... I was going to leave you guys alone on your useless little forum domain, but I see now that you guys just need something to do with your worthless lives sitting on the computer all day and night. So, I'll be around. I'm sure you'll be looking for my posts so you can run them into the ground. Just remember to to a break from typing once and a while. I bet your parents miss you spending all that time in your rooms and all. But seriously Markw, what did you do in the AUDIO profession that gave you so much experience? How long did you do it? How old are you? You must be pretty old if you were doing this since before I was just a stain.

...you were gone...or at least going...I have the feeling you don't know when to come in out of the rain either...

And yeah you're right, judging by some of your past posts, flogging the techno-babble jargon of 'high-pass filter' you sorta' remind me of the guy who owns one tool...a hammer...all of a sudden everything around starts to look like a nail...

jimHJJ(...P.S. junior, I have ties that are probably older...and a bit smarter...than you are...I'd suggest you show some respect for your elders...)

[markw]

I can't believe I haven't been reported for use of foul language. You guys could have kicked me off way before now. This must be because you really don't want me to go. Ehhh... I was going to leave you guys alone on your useless little forum domain, but I see now that you guys just need something to do with your worthless lives sitting on the computer all day and night. So, I'll be around. I'm sure you'll be looking for my posts so you can run them into the ground. Just remember to to a break from typing once and a while. I bet your parents miss you spending all that time in your rooms and all. But seriously Markw, what did you do in the AUDIO profession that gave you so much experience? How long did you do it? How old are you? You must be pretty old if you were doing this since before I was just a stain.

Yeah, yoiu're a man of your word, all right.

It's hard to get thrown off this site. But, at least everyone got to see what we're made of, both personally and technically, didn't they? After your dismal showing on this thread I'm surprised you can still show your face here, metaphorically speaking. Obviously, self pride isn't one of your strong points.

As for "running your post to the ground", well, had you not posted such bogus information as fact, it would never had happened. Try to write less but stick to facts instead of what you want to believe. As I said somewhere above, try to dazzle 'em with brilliance, not baffle 'em with BS. That should cut your word count tremendously.

And, as for more info on me, well, you'll just have to wait. That's not an issue here. My posts and their content speak for themselves. I don't owe you a resume, nor do you deserve one. Some here are familiar with my past from reading my posts here, which started in '98.

But, in the spirit of fairness, where do you derive your experience? After all, you posted such blatantly incorrect information and swore up and down they were all proven facts, I'm sure many here questioning your credentials right about now.

One ray of hope for you though. I dropped more than enough hints that you should be able to figure my age within a year or two.

And, if you havent noticed, I don't really care if you're here or not. This forum got along fine before you got here and I'm sure it will after you're gone.

[SlumpBuster]

Man... I just got a load of this thread. The topic can be deceiving. If I knew it was gonna be this kinda party, I'da stuck my dick in the mashed potatoes along time ago.

[royphil345]

Yeah... What's with this Audio Back guy???

There have been excellent systems with subs long before any HT receivers with sub outputs came out.

Filtering frequencies in a tape loop certainly wouldn't help add a sub. Somebody needs to rethink that one...

Many subs have speaker-level inputs and outputs for your main speakers that will provide an excellent crossover. This is what the original poster should probably look for in a sub. Even if the sub has no speaker-level crossover that filters lows from the main speakers, good results can be obtained simply by adjusting the crossover control on the sub. It is called a "crossover" control by the way, and wouldn't even be necessary if a sub was only designed to be used with HT receivers having built-in bass management.


My first experience with a powered sub was using the speaker-level connections / crossover built into a Mirage sub along with a Harman Kardon Dolby Pro-Logic receiver that had no sub output and some PSB Century 800 speakers. System sounded GREAT. Sub blended well and greatly improved sound for HT and music.