One thing I think bears noting is that these sorts of lists are usually done by committee, so each camp gets a few picks. In the end, we all end up with people on them we agree with and people we disagree with and a list with no real cohesion. But, we also end up with a few we each do like.

Reason being, we can discuss our individual schools of though all we want, but there's no concensus on this sort of thing and never will be. Each side has valid reasons for their ideas (however misguided those that disagree with me are) and in the end if you want to make an inclusive list you just agree to disagree and toss in a few for the different points of view and get on with it. Otherwise, you just make your own list with your own perspective. I'd venture that if you gathered any single person who had a hand in the creation of this list, their personal list would very different from the collective, finished product.