Oh, okay, never mind.

Yeah, I saw your argument in favour of the Honeydogs being listed as a 2004 release, and I agree with it. I mean, if people actually cared enough about prior years' lists enough to go back and check 'em out after anyone who changed 'em changed 'em, I'd say, yeah, just go ahead and change your 2003 list.

But no-one cares.

I like what I've seen some people do, and have a special section at the end of their list to list albums which they discovered a year late (albums that were really released in 2003, but most of us didn't discover until 2004, and were better than many of our 2003 choices). I mean, I only discovered that Rob Dougan album, and it's easily in my top 10 from that year, and I don't even know what my top 10 from that year is (I think it's a 2001 release). But who's going to care about a late discovery like that? No-one I know.

Well, that's not true -- to anyone who is reading, and does care, please forgive me for calling you a nobody -- I'm sure you exist and care.