Yeah, fine. But I question mentioning them before the Miles Davis Sextet; when Coltrane returned from Monk's band, and the Quintet added Cannonball Adderley, if they weren't a supergroup, I don't know what is. And that's the band that recorded Kind Of Blue.

In "Rock," I agree with the mention of CSN, except...how many good recs were there from them? Still, I'd take them before Velvet Revolver, or Chickenfoot, or Audioslave, or whatever. I don't think Blind Faith was as good as they could/should have been, even if they didn't disappoint as much as some others. I don't think I ever made it through the Dim Stars album, either. Both Electric Mud & theh London Howlin' Wolf Sessions are mostly steaming piles. Jamming With Edward sucks rocks, too, even though Ry Cooder should've worked well with the Stones. Super Session is underwhelming.

In short, I think probably 95% or more of these things are overblown ego-fests where few are going to be inclined to bring their 'a' material. At least in 'rock.' In jazz...different story. Still, I do think most of the best jazz comes from combos with well-defined leaders.

Ever read some of the reviews on the 'Dylan & the Dead' album?