Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: MMGs in a 3.1?

  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    70

    MMGs in a 3.1?

    Now that I'm a Maggie convert, I'm thinking about MMGs for fronts, an MMGC for center, and some sort of sub. Anyone using MMGs in HT? Thoughts? Suggestions for a compatible sub? Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Silence of the spam Site Moderator Geoffcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,417
    Quote Originally Posted by cackalacky
    Now that I'm a Maggie convert, I'm thinking about MMGs for fronts, an MMGC for center, and some sort of sub. Anyone using MMGs in HT? Thoughts? Suggestions for a compatible sub? Thanks in advance.
    Yes, I've run a full-up Magnepan HT. Right now I'm using a CC3 center, and two MC1's for L/R surrounds. I moved my 3.6's out of the mains duty as they are just too revealing for HT duty. I am interested in possibly using the 1.7qr as mains though.....

    The only subs that I had any success integrating with my Magnepans are my Velodyne servo subs. Paradigm also makes a servo sub, and Martin Logan subs are specifically designed to mate with planar speakers.

    I know all of these options aren't cheap, but the last thing you want to do is set up a system and then have to sell it because it doesn't perform up to what you want. If there's one specific item I would really recommend. it would be the CC3. The CC3 center is a bit more expensive than the MMGC but it's a wonderful speaker that really gives starlingly lifelike timbre to vocals. It should also mate well with any maggie main from the MMG on up to the 1.7s.
    Audio;
    Ming Da MC34-AB 75wpc
    PS Audio Classic 250. 500wpc into 4 ohms.
    PS Audio 4.5 preamp,
    Marantz 6170 TT Shure M97e cart.
    Arcam Alpha 9 CD.- 24 bit dCS Ring DAC.
    Magnepan 3.6r speakers Oak/black,

  3. #3
    Forum Regular blackraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    4,802
    I use my 1.6's in a 3.1 set up and they do just fine, but I'm not picky when it comes to HT, my main interest is 2ch. If your are on a budget, go with a Martin Logan dynamo sub but make sure it's non-ported. One of the cheaper new dynamo subs is ported and may not keep up with the maggies bass. ML subs mate fairly well with Maggies. You may even be able to find a good deal on a use Martin Logan Grotto i servo sub. The Velodyne servo subs are fantastic as the higher end REL's. The local Maggie dealer here recommends REL's for Maggies.
    Pass Labs X250 amp, BAT Vk-51se Preamp,
    Thorens TD-145 TT, Bellari phono preamp, Nagaoka MP-200 Cartridge
    Magnepan QR1.6 speakers
    Van Alstine Ultra Plus Hybrid Tube DAC
    Martin Logan Original Dynamo Sub
    Parasound A21 amp
    Vintage Luxman T-110 tuner
    Magnepan MMG's, Grant Fidelity DAC-11, Class D CDA254 amp
    Monitor Audio S1 speakers, PSB B6 speakers
    Vintage Technic's Integrated amp
    Music Hall 25.2 CDP
    Adcom GFR 700 AVR
    Cables- Cardas, Silnote, BJC
    Velodyne CHT 8 sub

  4. #4
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    116

    maggies in HT set up

    greetings from melbourne!
    I remember when back in Chicago, the best maggie set up I heard that was installed for HT surround, was a pair of MG3.5/R as mains, MG12's as rears, a martin logan electrostatic panel as center (forget the model) and a REL sub used in conjunction with Lexicon HT processor, Krell power amps and Burmester front end. this was a Krell/Burmester/Lexicon/Meridian system with all Maggies as speakers, only difference was the centre channel by martin logan. the sound and dynamics, details, speed, impact, power and finnese was second to none! I haven't heard HT system to date that beats this! and this set up was back in July 1998; the price tag for the entire system at the time was somewhere close to 100 grand! this includes cables, interconnects, voltage stabs, power conditioners etc, it also included a universal disc player special edition by Meridian- the best at the time (again cannot remember the model, but in the showroom it was the same player they used on a stellar 2-channel system comprising of conrad johnson & Inner Sound ESL's) that was simply outstanding! this is where I got hipmotized to conrad johnson and the ESL sound...

    so, there you go - if you want real high-end top notch stuff, sky's the limit. then again you can achieve equally good results with decent dynamics frills and whistles using NAD, or AudioLab gear driving maggies, still great sound and HT dynamics at a fraction of the cost. the choice is yours!
    cheers, Raj J

  5. #5
    Forum Regular audio amateur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,603
    Unless you like to turn up the center channel volume to hear dialogue better, there isn't much point. I personally do without a center in my system (4.1).

  6. #6
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    70
    Quote Originally Posted by blackraven
    I use my 1.6's in a 3.1 set up and they do just fine, but I'm not picky when it comes to HT, my main interest is 2ch. If your are on a budget, go with a Martin Logan dynamo sub but make sure it's non-ported. One of the cheaper new dynamo subs is ported and may not keep up with the maggies bass. ML subs mate fairly well with Maggies. You may even be able to find a good deal on a use Martin Logan Grotto i servo sub. The Velodyne servo subs are fantastic as the higher end REL's. The local Maggie dealer here recommends REL's for Maggies.
    Like you, my priority is 2 channel listening, and I'm about 90% certain that I'll go with the 1.7s. While many Maggie reviewers fuss about a lack of bass, my recent audition of the 1.7s found them to have a superb, natural, "nearly perfect" bass with plenty of slam.

    Maggie specific question: could EQ-augmented bass be used for HT instead of shelling out for an expensive sub? Would it achieve the rumble and boom sometimes called for in HT?

  7. #7
    Phila combat zone JoeE SP9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,597
    Get a sub. Two subs are even better. A decent sub is in IMO the smart idea for all Magneplanars. My friend with the MG-20.1's has two large (18") Velodyne servo subs running from 50Hz down. He thinks they improve the extreme low bass. So do I.

    Of course you can try using an equalizer on the 1.7's.

    I'm an ex-Maggie (MG-1, 2, 3) owner. IMO Eq'ing Maggy's to give box speaker slam and/or the extreme (anything below 35Hz or so) low end of a good sub doesn't work very well.
    ARC SP9 MKIII, VPI HW19, Rega RB300
    Marcof PPA1, Shure, Sumiko, Ortofon carts
    Marantz CD63SE CD,Yamaha DVD-S1800
    DAC's: MSB, Behringer UCA222, Emotiva XDA-2
    Accuphase T101 tuner,Nakamichi LX-5, ZX-7 Teac V-7010
    Lexicon MC8, Emotiva UMC-200 processors
    2 Adcom GFA-545,2 modified Dynaco MK3's, 2 bridged Crown XLS-402, Paradigm X-30, Behringer CX2310, DSP1124P
    2 12" Transmission Line Subs (PASS DIY El-Pipe-O), Acoustat Spectra 22 ESL's (fronts), Acoustat Model 1 ESL's/SPW-1 Woofer (rears)

  8. #8
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    116

    maggies used with subs

    yes, I agree - using subs with maggies absolutely kills the natural bass maggies can deliver if driven with the right amplification.
    I have noticed many out there using mega watt monoblocks on their maggies - this is not required! you are just thrashing out loudness and noise and not music. I have tried 350 watt monoblocks on maggies (mg3.5/r) sound was well ok, lots of power, kaboom, guts & glory...; then used a premier highend 70 watter power amp from c-j, sound was well musical and very relaxing, in fact it was Sweet! it did have limits of power though on certain passages when maggies demanded, but that was because I turned up the levels, you needs to. I guess when you're young and an enthusiast, there is a tendancy to show off a little, but when a decade or so passess, you will appreciate the artists more and what they offer. normal realistic levels that is pleasing to listen to is what you want. same goes for home theatre, it should be nice and feel good to listen and to watch, not end up with a headache because of too much boom / distortion, and inaccurate tones...
    use a sub only if you are completely deaf in the bottom octaves!
    cheers, RJ

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Latest AudioReview Articles

Hot Deals

Latest News

AudioReview on Facebook