State of the Union

[jeskibuff]

It is interesting to see that you are assuming that I am believing everything the democrats say is true.

You certainly echo many of the standard liberal talking points. That indicates to me that you don't apply much critical thought to their theories. How anyone can believe even a smidgen of what the Democrats say is beyond me. They did a remarkable job of losing an enormous amount of credibility over the last couple of years. I like this cartoon and it was deleted from another post I made (because it was "off-topic"), but it's "on-topic" now, isn't it?

I watch the news everyday and read about current events on the internet as well. Are there any sources that you find to have all the answers to our country? Fox News?

I approach ALL news with the same attitude: the writer/anchor likely is inserting their own bias into it, no matter how small. What they say has to be measured up against the yardstick of common sense to determine if any truth lies within. Sorry, but there's too much out there where the obvious motivation is to distort the picture and that is overwhelmingly a result of the desire to promote selfish liberal agendas (gay rights, special treatment for minorities, etc.). There's PLENTY of information out there, especially on the internet. You just need to learn to whittle out the bias to see if there's anything of substance on the inside. Often there's a story within a story. For instance, the Dan Rather episode exposed the ugly bias of mainstream media instead of exposing GWB's supposed evasions of TANG duty as it had intended. Can you spell B-A-C-K-F-I-R-E??? To answer your question, it would be stupid to assume that there are news sources that "have all the answers", but I bet you're really just fishing for my news sources, aren't you? No problem...I usually watch NBC news programs (Nightly News, Meet The Press). Like I said, common sense is the backbone to deciphering the news. Liberals have consistently demonstrated that they possess so little of the quality, so I understand how they get things so wrong so much of the time.

Maybe you could stop believing the Neocon propoganda so blindly.

Maybe you can get a clue and consider the possibility that I DON'T buy propaganda like you think I do. This is best exemplified by this Cox & Forkum cartoon:

Obviously, it is beyond your comprehension that someone who thinks differently from you can "think for themselves". Gag me!

Maybe open up your mind to the fact that politics is flawed and not that just the liberals are flawed.

I've stated many times before that I'm not happy with everything that GWB and/or Republicans have done. People are imperfect and politicians are especially susceptible to being "bought". Still, the difference between Republicans and Democrats is about the same difference between the smell around a just-flushed toilet and that of a communal outhouse. Most politicians are rank, but Democrats have proven to be nothing short of putrid!

I feel that you are just way to extreme to the "right".

In typical liberal fashion, you rely too much on your feelwings. Your slanted perception of me is probably attributable to your extreme lefty bias. Go figure.

Do you have some sort of allegiance to the republicans? Are you Bush's illegitamate son? Is Bush your savior? (Those last two comments were ment as a smarta$$ joke)

I certainly hope you're not a comedian by profession. Really lame.

You have a problem with people blindly believing people like Michael Moore or the extreme left. I can't blame you. I have a problem with people believing the Neocons or the exteme right blindly.

Refer to the above cartoon once again. Why is it that I can so easily tear up virtually ANY of your lame arguments? Why is it so easy to prove you wrong? Maybe because I see things clearly and apply common sense and reason. So much of the conservative agenda holds up nicely against that standard. Practically nothing in the liberal agenda does. Call it "following blindly", but if you can't see the difference then it is not me who is "following blindly", is it?

I wish there was a way for us to get facts about our nation that is completely unbiased.

It really doesn't matter much. It's quite apparent that if you got anything unbiased, you'd apply your own bias to it. What's the difference, eh?

I agree with you 100%, jetskibuff

Why thanks, bjorn! By the way, I hate jet skis, so you may notice there is no "t" in my moniker. No problem though...it's a screwy moniker anyway! Now, ANSWER MY QUESTION...what does ROFLWTFbbq111oneone mean (what you posted in that QuickSilver thread)?