-
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
You probably are, you are probably still in JR high
Wrong again. But, I'd add that your limited grasp of logic and piss poor grammar is a lot more reminiscent of grade school than anything that I post! :out:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
It is dead
dead dead dead dead .
Kinda like you above the neck.:1:
Right, since you interpret a tech segment that grew by more than 30% last year as dead, I'll take your assessment of my cognitive acument as your bass-ackward acknowledgment that you've lost yet another argument.
Keep right on repeating your plasma is dead mantra. It just makes you look more and more like a plasma shill as plasma sales grow, and your street lunatic rantings steer one person after another on this board towards plasma.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
Why would I keep any of my old TV sets around?
And why would I use one as a "mirrow"? :out:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
My Vizio is mounted in the back room, my folks have my old 37" in their living room.
LOOK at the pot calling the kettle black, never seen pics of your goldstar special.
The link to my home theater pics have been in my signature for longer than you've been on this board. The only reason you haven't seen it is because you're either too lazy or haven't been taking your Ritalin. When I get around to updating it with my current TV, the new pics will be there. Pics of myself, my wife, and my daughter have also been posted on this site. Unlike you, I have nothing to hide because I'm not a troll.
Funny that you'd bring up pot, cuz short-term memory loss and short attention span seem to be an issue with you ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
And the "WALMART DRUGS are for diabetes assclown.:1:
And the symptoms that infect your posts have nothing to with insulin levels! :out:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
The only "blur" around here is your personality.
I HAVE NEVER SEEN ANY SO CALLED "MOTION BLUR".
OR BURN IN EITHER.
I am two for two, you are one for two
And you claim that others are factually challenged and make nothing but personal attacks? :out:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
It doesnt exist AT ALL, it is totally MADE UP.
The motion resolution measurements are there for anyone who wants to see them. The only thing made up is your repeated denials.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
A TEST PATTERN is the only reconized way to measure resolution,
And a test pattern is exactly what's used to measure motion resolution. Try reading the info on my links sometime, rather than just staring at the pictures.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
And 60hz is also the standard, as TV is 60 fps.
Yep, that's why all plasma TVs use 60 Hz as the native screen refresh rate. Low motion resolution is not an issue with plasma TVs, so they don't need to go with 120 Hz or 240 Hz. The Pioneer plasmas have a native 72 Hz mode to handle 1080/24p signals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
A 120HZ SET DOUBLES that frame rate, a 24p blue player puts out 72(24fps times 3)
in order to eliminate 3:2 pulldown.
That's not all it does. Most 120 Hz sets use interpolated images to fill in the gaps between frames. That's why some reviewers think that 120 Hz motion interpolation makes the picture quality look worse -- every other image is something fabricated by the video processor. Now, with LCD manufacturers going to 240 Hz and 480 Hz screen refresh rates, upwards of 75% to 87.5% of the frames are no longer native to the source.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
If a set advertises anything higher its just a con, it wont give you any resolution increase,
Yet, 120 Hz LCDs routinely outperform 60 Hz LCDs on motion resolution tests.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
its impossible to get any res increase in a video pic without an expensive scaler.
You do get an increase in PQ by deinterlacing a pic(480i to 480p, or 1080i to 1080p) but that is just because you are doing away with interlacing.
Deinterlacing alone does not explain away the wretched motion resolution performance with 60 Hz LCD TVs, but I see that you'll keep trying to bending the facts to suit your agenda.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
I have read claims from some plasma makers that their sets are "480" hz
HAD ME LAUGHING ROLLING ON THE FLOOR.
Even IF a set has this rediculously high refresh rate it would be of no practical value.
And if you actually read what the number is, you'd see that it's not the refresh rate for the screen itself, just the video subfield processor. Nothing more than a marketing number for the J6Ps that buy their TVs based on spec numbers. Of course, the only number that matters to you is the price tag.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
And as for "moving images" my set will have moving images long after your POS
Right, this coming from someone who reflexively kicks his TVs to the curb before the warranty even runs out. Spare me your hypocrisy until you actually keep a TV for a year or two. :out:
Like I said, I'll take my chances with a company that has the highest reliability in the industry and proven track record for customer service and warranty support, over some marketer with an inconsistent reliability record and post-warranty support that was nonexistent until very recently.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoadRunner6
Here we go again, a page after page rematch of the Pix and Boom-Boom Wooch duking it out all over again!
Very prophetic if I do say so myself!
RR6 :thumbsup:
-
You are Nostradomos(sp?) reincarnated RR6. :thumbsup:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
I picked that up off the web, and then politely declined the invitation from your old lady.:1:
If my old lady gave you an invitation, you should have accepted. It would have been your only chance in life to be with a hot babe. Well, at least one that didn't charge you.
-
Great comeback G. :thumbsup:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMichael
If my old lady gave you an invitation, you should have accepted. It would have been your only chance in life to be with a hot babe. Well, at least one that didn't charge you.
Oh, that was beautiful!
-
We should frame it, ya know? :lol:
-
Oh come on guys. Let's not make him feel any worse than he already does. He deserves our pitty.
-
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMichael
Oh come on guys. Let's not make him feel any worse than he already does. He deserves our pitty.
FUNNY, YOUR OLD LADY SAID THE SAME ABOUT YOU.:1:
-
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich-n-Texas
You are Nostradomos(sp?) reincarnated RR6. :thumbsup:
more like NOSTRA-DUMBASS, really.:1:
-
Oh nooooooooo!!! An afternoon appearance by the pill pusher! :yikes:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
FUNNY, YOUR OLD LADY SAID THE SAME ABOUT YOU.:1:
She does worry about me so.
-
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woochifer
Wrong again. But, I'd add that your limited grasp of logic and piss poor grammar is a lot more reminiscent of grade school than anything that I post! :out:
At least I have some grasp of logic
Quote:
Right, since you interpret a tech segment that grew by more than 30% last year as dead, I'll take your assessment of my cognitive acument as your bass-ackward acknowledgment that you've lost yet another argument.
And LCD still outsells it by a wide margin.
Not to mention that a lot of those "sales" were to business and included a lot of "spiffs"
(kickbacks)
Quote:
Keep right on repeating your plasma is dead mantra. It just makes you look more and more like a plasma shill as plasma sales grow, and your street lunatic rantings steer one person after another on this board towards plasma.
Plasma is DEAD because of many technical reasons, not to mention economic ones.
First it was the gas escaping from the tube envelope , but they supposedly "fixed"
that, and then it was screen burn in, and then they supposedly "fixed" that
Wit such an amalgamation of patches and work arounds, like cycling the picture on and off, effectively cutting the brightness in half.
THIS next disaster will drive away even more customers, as will the next one.
ITS BASICALLY A RUBE GOLDBERG CONTRAPTION,
destined for a spot next to the eight track tape player in the attic.
Quote:
And why would I use one as a "mirrow"? :out:
A typo, know what that is?
And I dount you would use one as a mirror, might break it even worse than it will be already
Quote:
The link to my home theater pics have been in my signature for longer than you've been on this board. The only reason you haven't seen it is because you're either too lazy or haven't been taking your Ritalin. When I get around to updating it with my current TV, the new pics will be there. Pics of myself, my wife, and my daughter have also been posted on this site. Unlike you, I have nothing to hide because I'm not a troll.
I have seen you setup, and you have plenty to hide, even if you dont realize it
Quote:
Funny that you'd bring up pot, cuz short-term memory loss and short attention span seem to be an issue with you ...
You are the one out of touch with reality
Quote:
And the symptoms that infect your posts have nothing to with insulin levels! :out:
And the lies, propaganda and outright mistruths have nothing to do with your low I.Q levels.
Beleiving a propaganda website fronted by the MAJOR plasma make, however, is
Quote:
And you claim that others are factually challenged and make nothing but personal attacks? :out:
What have you been doing during this entire post except lying and making personal
"attacks"?
Quote:
The motion resolution measurements are there for anyone who wants to see them. The only thing made up is your repeated denials.
I deny that there is such a thing as "motion resolution" and anybody with ANY electronics training whatsoever will deny the same thing.
These "measurements" appeared on a propaganda website hosted by a CE whore
who spent 30 years as a PR hack working for the people trying to push plasma tv
down the throats of an unsuspecting public in order to pay for a stupid investment in a new plasma plant.
They mean absolutely NOTHING
Quote:
And a test pattern is exactly what's used to measure motion resolution. Try reading the info on my links sometime, rather than just staring at the pictures.
a test pattern is a still image dillweed, how do you measure something moving with
a still image.
There has been several tries at coming up with a valid and consistent way of measuring
resolution during motion, but no sucess so far.
You can get in the ballpark but nothing precise.
The rest is, as SAMUEL CLEMMENS said, "lies, damn lies, and statistics".
Which you ought to know about, handling all three for our benevolent govt.
Quote:
Yep, that's why all plasma TVs use 60 Hz as the native screen refresh rate. Low motion resolution is not an issue with plasma TVs, so they don't need to go with 120 Hz or 240 Hz. The Pioneer plasmas have a native 72 Hz mode to handle 1080/24p signals.
Its not an "issue" with LCD sets EITHER.
KEEP MAKING STUFF UP, IN the end reality biting you in the ass will still
hurt like a b***tch
Quote:
That's not all it does. Most 120 Hz sets use interpolated images to fill in the gaps between frames. That's why some reviewers think that 120 Hz motion interpolation makes the picture quality look worse -- every other image is something fabricated by the video processor. Now, with LCD manufacturers going to 240 Hz and 480 Hz screen refresh rates, upwards of 75% to 87.5% of the frames are no longer native to the source.
Those "interpolated" images are not made out of whole cloth, they are derived from actual frames.
This is not a problem, expensive scalers were doing this well a decade agao, and now new tech makes the price cheaper
Quote:
Yet, 120 Hz LCDs routinely outperform 60 Hz LCDs on motion resolution tests.
Are those the same made up POS "tests" you are talking about above?
120hz SETS ARE GOING TO LOOK BETTER, there is more info on teh screen at any given time.
AND FOR THE LAST TIME, the "motion res" is going to be the SAME as the still res,
a progressive DOES NOT lose res during movement, I DONT CARE what YOU SAY,
I will listen to engineers, not a govt hack, thank you
Quote:
Deinterlacing alone does not explain away the wretched motion resolution performance with 60 Hz LCD TVs, but I see that you'll keep trying to bending the facts to suit your agenda.
YOU are the one with an "agenda" not me, and deinterlacing has NOTHING to do with "motion res" since that DOESNT EXIST.
I guess you think that repeating a lie often enough will make people beleive it.
Now where have I heard THAT before?
Quote:
And if you actually read what the number is, you'd see that it's not the refresh rate for the screen itself, just the video subfield processor. Nothing more than a marketing number for the J6Ps that buy their TVs based on spec numbers. Of course, the only number that matters to you is the price tag.
price does matter to any intelligent consumer, and the rest is gibberish, as what the subfield (and other procs) output is what appears on THE SCREEN
Quote:
Right, this coming from someone who reflexively kicks his TVs to the curb before the warranty even runs out. Spare me your hypocrisy until you actually keep a TV for a year or two. :out:
I do trade TV sets quite often, but my last one I had three years, and I TEND TO know those who get my older equipment(it sells easy, they know what I buy)
So its important to have a set that will last, it might be one I keep awhile, and longetivity
also plays to quality, but of course you dont know that(or much of anything)
Quote:
Like I said, I'll take my chances with a company that has the highest reliability in the industry and proven track record for customer service and warranty support, over some marketer with an inconsistent reliability record and post-warranty support that was nonexistent until very recently.
Panasonic has high reliability, which is why I have bought several of their products,
but they are not miracle workers, not even they can turn a turd into a mercedes.
as you will find out
Hopefully the hard way:1:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
At least I have some grasp of logic
Tenuous at best, as evidenced by your posts. :out:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
And LCD still outsells it by a wide margin.
Yeah, because the vast majority of LCD shipments are in the 32" and under class, and include OEM shipments for computer monitors -- all markets that plasma doesn't compete in.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
Not to mention that a lot of those "sales" were to business and included a lot of "spiffs"
(kickbacks)
What do you call all those flat panel computer monitors sitting in offices?
And where's your proof of "spiffs"? Or is this just more imaginary conspiracy nonsense?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
Plasma is DEAD because of many technical reasons, not to mention economic ones.First it was the gas escaping from the tube envelope , but they supposedly "fixed"
that, and then it was screen burn in, and then they supposedly "fixed" that
Wit such an amalgamation of patches and work arounds, like cycling the picture on and off, effectively cutting the brightness in half.
Lemme get this straight. A technology is dead when companies keep improving its reliability and performance, and when sales keep growing by more than double digits ever year. And you claim to have "some" grasp of logic? :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
I have seen you setup, and you have plenty to hide, even if you dont realize it
Yeah, that still explains why you've never posted any pics of your setup or yourself. Wassamadda, you scared of what we will say when the curtain behind your charade gets lifted? :cool:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
You are the one out of touch with reality
Only the reality that you manufacture inside your head.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
And the lies, propaganda and outright mistruths have nothing to do with your low I.Q levels.
Beleiving a propaganda website fronted by the MAJOR plasma make, however, is
Low IQ? I'm not the one that prefers to manufacture fake conspiracy theories when the facts aren't on my side. Or do you actually believe in your own BS? Doesn't sound very bright to me! :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
What have you been doing during this entire post except lying and making personal
"attacks"?
Uh, let's see ... correcting your many factual errors and basically exposing your posts for the troll fodder that it is?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
I deny that there is such a thing as "motion resolution" and anybody with ANY electronics training whatsoever will deny the same thing.
Right, so all of the LCD and plasma TV manufacturers who are touting the improved motion resolution of their latest TVs don't have "any" electronics training? :rolleyes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
These "measurements" appeared on a propaganda website hosted by a CE whore
who spent 30 years as a PR hack working for the people trying to push plasma tv
down the throats of an unsuspecting public in order to pay for a stupid investment in a new plasma plant.
They mean absolutely NOTHING
Blah blah blah. So that explains why CNET, Home Theater, HDTV Test, and other review sites use the same motion resolution test. Face it, this is now a standard benchmark test that's very commonly used. And gosh, some LCD TVs have actually begun to perform well on that test.
And like I keep asking you. If Gary Merson is such as plasma hack, then why does he maintain a list of recommended LCD TVs? Basically, you bought a cheap LCD TV and will manufacture whatever lies you can come up with to smear anybody who points out the drawbacks of making the choice that you did. No need to take it personally when the facts don't coincide with your fanboy rants. :out:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
a test pattern is a still image dillweed, how do you measure something moving with
a still image.
With a monoscope test pattern.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
There has been several tries at coming up with a valid and consistent way of measuring
resolution during motion, but no sucess so far.
Name some of these "several tries." Otherwise, we'll just chuck this into the pile with the rest of your unsubstantiated BS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
The rest is, as SAMUEL CLEMMENS said, "lies, damn lies, and statistics".
And then there's reality and pixie's warped interpretation of it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
Its not an "issue" with LCD sets EITHER.
KEEP MAKING STUFF UP, IN the end reality biting you in the ass will still
hurt like a b***tch
How would you know? Because you're the one getting bitten by reality most of the time?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
Those "interpolated" images are not made out of whole cloth, they are derived from actual frames.
And interpolated images are not the same as actual frames. With these new 240 Hz LCDs, now 75% of what the viewer sees is an interpolated image.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
This is not a problem, expensive scalers were doing this well a decade agao, and now new tech makes the price cheaper
Cheaper, but not better. So, if LCD tech did not have motion resolution problems, then why would LCD TV manufacturers even bother with 120 Hz screen refresh? And why would they advertise that 120 Hz improves motion if no motion is lost with 60 Hz LCD TVs as you claim? All plasmas are natively 60 Hz because they don't need motion interpolation to smooth out the motion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
Are those the same made up POS "tests" you are talking about above?
120hz SETS ARE GOING TO LOOK BETTER, there is more info on teh screen at any given time.
So that explains why the 60 Hz Pioneer plasmas are currently the most highest rated HDTV on the market? :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
AND FOR THE LAST TIME, the "motion res" is going to be the SAME as the still res,
How many times are you going to say "FOR THE LAST TIME"? :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
YOU are the one with an "agenda" not me, and deinterlacing has NOTHING to do with "motion res" since that DOESNT EXIST.
Actually, YOUR agenda is quite clearly all about promoting plasma. Your rantings about plasma and LCD are so over-the-top insane and repetitive that no one can take it seriously!
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
I guess you think that repeating a lie often enough will make people beleive it.
Now where have I heard THAT before?
Nah, you're the one that actually believes this, given that how much you practice on this board.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
price does matter to any intelligent consumer,
And nothing else matters to the pixie consumer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
I do trade TV sets quite often, but my last one I had three years, and I TEND TO know those who get my older equipment(it sells easy, they know what I buy)
And that just makes your rantings about durability and reliability all the more hypocritical, since you don't even bother to keep your TVs long enough to find out how blind your fanboy devotion really is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
So its important to have a set that will last, it might be one I keep awhile, and longetivity
also plays to quality, but of course you dont know that(or much of anything)
Right, so that explains why you bought a TV from a company with an inconsistent track record for reliability, and was imposing extraneous $500+ charges for boxing and shipping on warranty service when you first bought from them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
Panasonic has high reliability, which is why I have bought several of their products,
but they are not miracle workers, not even they can turn a turd into a mercedes.
Yeah, they're not miracle workers. They just make TVs with the lowest failure rate in the industry, and back it up a solid track record for customer service and spare parts availability.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
as you will find out
Hopefully the hard way:1:
Why? Because your misery loves company? No thanks.
I'm not the one that bought a disposable TV. Maybe you will find out "the hard way" when your TV needs a part that nobody can locate, or your beloved fanboy company wants to charge you shipping for warranty service. But, I certainly wouldn't wish that on anyone, even a lying troll like you. :out:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMichael
Oh come on guys. Let's not make him feel any worse than he already does. He deserves our pitty.
You give him pity, but I would rather give him rat poison.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Terrence the Terrible
You give him pity, but I would rather give him rat poison.
And then you'd miss him. Just like you miss Lex and P.S.
Don't try to deny it. I know that you live to enlighten the non-enlighten-able.
Who would be left for you to play with?
-
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Terrence the Terrible
You give him pity, but I would rather give him rat poison.
I would think you would be philosopically opposed to a poison aimed at your own kind:1:
-
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMichael
And then you'd miss him. Just like you miss Lex and P.S.
Don't try to deny it. I know that you live to enlighten the non-enlighten-able.
Who would be left for you to play with?
GEE, is your nose far enough up there to see his tonsils yet.
You DO realize that if it werent for Google TALKY WOULDNT "KNOW"
ANYTHING?:1:
|