Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176

    New audio chip technology


  2. #2
    Forum Regular paul_pci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,246
    Description makes it sound like the audio would be a bit artificial.

  3. #3
    I took a headstart... basite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mortsel, Antwerp, Belgium, Europe, Earth
    Posts
    3,056
    seeing the word 'cheap' and 'digital' can't be good,

    thing is that they want to digitalize speakers, other thing is that sound itselves is something analog,

    and, they want to modify the sound so 'cheaper speakers' can sound good too, this would most likely be done by something digital, which would most likely affect the crossover too, making it more complicated, and this is where it becomes bad, because, the less complicated, the better,
    IMO, the only way to make things sound good, is to use good equipment, and good materials, which is also making it more expensive....
    Life is music!

    Mcintosh MA6400 Integrated
    Double Advent speakers
    Thiel CS2.3's
    *DIY Lenco L75 TT
    * SME 3012 S2
    * Rega RB-301
    *Denon DL-103 in midas body
    *Denon DL-304
    *Graham slee elevator EXP & revelation
    *Lehmann audio black cube SE
    Marantz CD5001 OSE
    MIT AVt 2 IC's
    Sonic link Black earth IC's
    Siltech MXT New york IC's
    Kimber 4VS speakercable
    Furutech powercord and plugs.

    I'm a happy 20 year old...

  4. #4
    Phila combat zone JoeE SP9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,710
    Here we go with another gadget designed to compensate for the awful job of mixing/mastering done in most studios. Instead of compensating for over processed over compressed music they should do it right in the first place.
    ARC SP9 MKIII, VPI HW19, Rega RB300
    Marcof PPA1, Shure, Sumiko, Ortofon carts, Yamaha DVD-S1800
    Behringer UCA222, Emotiva XDA-2, HiFimeDIY
    Accuphase T101, Teac V-7010, Nak ZX-7. LX-5, Behringer DSP1124P
    Front: Magnepan 1.7, DBX 223SX, 2 modified Dynaco MK3's, 2, 12" DIY TL subs (Pass El-Pipe-O) 2 bridged Crown XLS-402
    Rear/HT: Emotiva UMC200, Acoustat Model 1/SPW-1, Behringer CX2310, 2 Adcom GFA-545

  5. #5
    Shostakovich fan Feanor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    8,127

    Bring it on!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Peabody
    I'm not fundamentally anti-digital like a folks around here. In fact I'm inclided to believe that analog => PCM 24/96 => analog is inherently transparent to human hearing if properly done.

    What this "chip" or device is doing is can done now in a home stereo using units from TACT or DEQX. For that matter, it can be done fairly well, given careful setup, by a Behringer DCX2496 and two or three Behringer DEQ2496's, for a cost of under a grand, (plus additional amplifiers for bi- or tri-amping).

  6. #6
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    I thought much of what the chip did was to also recreate spacial effect. The brain behind Dynavector has a system that sort of does that for home. It's a processor and recommended speakers. His speaker set up is four speakers but the larger are in the rear. It's been a while since I read about it, it was interesing.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •