Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Suspended Smokey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Ozarks
    Posts
    3,959

    Red face ConsumerReports HDTVs recommendation.

    From March '06 issue:

    LCD FLAT-PANEL HDTV

    Consumer Reports Quick Picks for 30- to 32-inch LCD television sets are the Sharp LC-32DA5U($1,600), the Panasonic Viera TC-32LX50 ($1,400) and the Maxent MX-32X3 ($1,100).

    Their Quick Picks for smaller sets are Sharp Aquos LC-26GD4U ($1,500), Panasonic Viera TC-26LX50 ($1,200), Maxent MX-26X3 ($900), ILO (ILO-2600 (Wal-Mart) ($795), Sony LCD Wega KLV-S23A10 ($1,200).

    PLASMA TELEVISION HDTV

    Consumer Reports Quick Picks for a 50-inch television set is the Panasonic TH-50PX50U ($4,000), for 42-inch HD sets the Panasonic TH-42Px50U ($3,000) and the Panasonic TH-42PX500U ($4,000).

    REAR-PROJECTION HDTV

    Consumer Reports Quick Picks for high-definition television picture quality are Sharp 56DR650 ($2,500), Sony Grand Wega KDF-E50A10 ($2,500), and Toshiba Theater-Wide HD 52HM95 ($2,500).

    PICTURE-TUBE (CRT) HDTV

    Consumer Reports Quick Picks for wide-screen sets are Sony FD Trinitron Wega HDTV KD-34XBR960 ($1,900), Sony FD Trinitron Wega Hi-Scan KD-34XS955 ($1, 550), Sony FD Trinitron Wega Hi-Scan KV-34HS420 ($1,200), Sony FD Trinitron Wega Hi-Scan KV-30HS420 ($800), and Sony FD Trinitron Wega Hi-Scan KD-30XS955 ($1,000.).

    http://newswire.ascribe.org/cgi-bin/...=2006&public=0

  2. #2
    His and Her Room! westcott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    440
    Unfortunately, Consumer Reports places way too much emphasis on attributes not associated with picture quality.

    Its like using the Washington Post to recommend your speakers system (sound familiar?).

  3. #3
    Forum Regular paul_pci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,246
    I guess CR didn't hear about the massive failure in Sony's LCD modlels including the KDF-E50A10 which they mention. What a totally useless publication.

  4. #4
    Suspended Smokey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Ozarks
    Posts
    3,959
    Quote Originally Posted by paul_pci
    I guess CR didn't hear about the massive failure in Sony's LCD modlels including the KDF-E50A10 which they mention. What a totally useless publication.
    I don't think reliability is a factor in the rating of TVs. Most weight are given to picture quality, sound and ease of use. I don't have the march issue, but they may have discussed Sony reliabilty in their rating's editorial

    Any more info as to why Sony LCDs failed?

  5. #5
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    133

    Picture Quality As A Main Parameter

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey
    I don't think reliability is a factor in the rating of TVs. Most weight are given to picture quality, sound and ease of use. I don't have the march issue, but they may have discussed Sony reliabilty in their rating's editorial

    Any more info as to why Sony LCDs failed?
    It is my understanding that just about any modern HDTV (of the same type, i.e. LCD, CRT, DLP etc.) can be calibrated to look exactly the same as any other tv. Strange as it may seem, picture quality should not be the primary reason for selecting an HDTV. It is so very easy for a tv dealer to make one set look better than another simply to sell the model that they make the most money from.

  6. #6
    Forum Regular paul_pci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey
    I don't think reliability is a factor in the rating of TVs. Most weight are given to picture quality, sound and ease of use. I don't have the march issue, but they may have discussed Sony reliabilty in their rating's editorial

    Any more info as to why Sony LCDs failed?
    Sorry, I was outta town for the weekend. It was a software problem. Audioholics had the article on it.

  7. #7
    Forum Regular hermanv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    968

    Rptv

    I notice that Consumer Reports didn't bother to differentiate between the various techniques for RPT. There's the old standby CRTs (weakness convergence issues, weigth, size), LCoS (weakness contrast ratio, expensive lamp) DLP (weakness rainbow effect, expensive lamp).

    When you read various sites about which TV is "best" their bias for whatever technique they sell or love is quite evident.

    As usual it's really different strokes for different folks. If one technology was superior in any significant sense, all commecrcial HDTVs would be built that way. Modern coporations are terrified of being left behind, so they all jump on any bandwagon currently leading the pack.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •