Results 1 to 25 of 85

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Forum Regular Brainstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    195
    Received some screen samples to compare with and I have to say the micro is more best suited.

    I placed the normal perforated screen and micro screen at distance where JBL speakers, I could instantly see the differences between the two the normal stood out over 8 feet away and that’s too near. About 15 feet away it starts becoming less noticeable or transparent, so around 20 feet away your hardly going to notice it.

    The micro screen was spot on at 8 feet away the holes look like (0.5 or less mm) the normal one looks like 0.7 or just a bit larger. The holes on the normal are also spaced out and guess that is what gives it away in small room.

    If I had to use non-perforated screen and use a micro as template to drill micro holes with hobby drill it would take weeks.

    I like the smell of the plastic between the three types.

    Also rubbing my fingers or sliding them along the surface produces different frequencies.

    I’ll have to try later on some sound tests with the normal over micro while hanging it in front of the centre channel and pass a few sine wave tones or pink noise see what the db ratio sound loss is.

    Also been phoning around at another supplier that the chap suggested try Screenline which is an Italian make.

    I’m waiting some figures on screen cost just the material I don’t want no manual/automatic screen retraction system just the screen.





    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Small but perfectly formed JBL home cinema-perf1.jpg   Small but perfectly formed JBL home cinema-perf2.jpg   Small but perfectly formed JBL home cinema-perf3.jpg  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •