Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    36

    OK, time for a really stupid question..

    I will be in the process of moving shortly and tearing down my existing TV and components and reassembling them in my new house. I have never hooked up any video portion of the following components (DVD, VCR, XBox) to my receiver, only the audio. What do I gain by running the video thru the receiver (I will have a new Onkyo 601)?? I was always under the assumption that any connection will result in signal loss so I've always run the video directly from the sources to the TV. Man do I feel dumm so take it easy on me!!

  2. #2
    Forum Regular Woochifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    6,883
    It's all about convenience. Running the video through the receiver allows you to do your audio and video switching through a single remote. It also minimizes the amount of cable that you need since most of the equipment will be closer to the receiver than the TV, and you only need one output running to the TV with the receiver controlling the video switching..

  3. #3
    Silence of the spam Site Moderator Geoffcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,326

    Some Receivers allow video processing too

    Quote Originally Posted by twwesn
    I will be in the process of moving shortly and tearing down my existing TV and components and reassembling them in my new house. I have never hooked up any video portion of the following components (DVD, VCR, XBox) to my receiver, only the audio. What do I gain by running the video thru the receiver (I will have a new Onkyo 601)?? I was always under the assumption that any connection will result in signal loss so I've always run the video directly from the sources to the TV. Man do I feel dumm so take it easy on me!!

    My old Pioneer VSX-5500 had rudimentary video noise reduction and sharpening. I had the VCR running through it for a time, but it was only with composite. Right now I have two component video cables going directly into the TV, but if my TV didnt accept two component inputs I would be forced to use the receiver as a switch.

    With DVI you should be able to do digital processing in the receiver, but I think that it might be too costly to add that to most receivers.
    Audio;
    Ming Da MC34-AB 75wpc
    PS Audio Classic 250. 500wpc into 4 ohms.
    PS Audio 4.5 preamp,
    Marantz 6170 TT Shure M97e cart.
    Arcam Alpha 9 CD.- 24 bit dCS Ring DAC.
    Magnepan 3.6r speakers Oak/black,

  4. #4
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    dallas, tx
    Posts
    33

    For best video...go straight from source to TV

    The only time I recommend that people combine all the video signals in the receiver then go to the TV is if they TV only has one input.

    BUT if your TV has multiple inputs...use em.

    Reasons:
    1. Loss of video quality...more cables, more connections...more possibility to add noise to the signal.

    2. Different sources will give different video level outputs...since it is going to only one video connection on your TV you have to calibrate to look good for the vcr or the dvd player. But if they are on seperate inputs the contrast, color and brightness can be uniqe per device.

    3. less cables...for example you own a DVD player and VCR if they are different formats like s-video, component video and composite. So you will still have to buy more than one type of cable. And sometimes it is cheaper to buy 2 sets of 6foot cables than 2 sets of 3foot cables and one set of 6 foot cables.

    see ya

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Decision time... Last question I promise! :)
    By Youngee in forum General Audio
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-25-2004, 02:23 PM
  2. BIGGER stupid question...(I will NOT be out done!)
    By thepogue in forum Analog Room
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-14-2004, 07:14 AM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-30-2004, 06:18 AM
  4. Replies: 47
    Last Post: 01-26-2004, 02:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •