New LED LCDs have a more reflective screen

[Sir Terrence the Terrible]

[QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible][QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible][QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible]

ACTUALLY, no.
You can put lipstick on a pig, its still bacon. And from the blue-red glasses to modern digital systems , they are all the same, basically

Wow, this in depth explanation has the profoundness of a tea spoon of water sitting on flat pavement. If one had a cursory understanding of 3D, they would understand the depth of the ignorance of this statement. Analgraph 3D is so inferior to both polarized and shutter based systems it is pitiful. Can anyone say color distortion and loss of resolution?

BOTH WORK the same way, except movies need to cram two frames into one screen

Interesting statement considering one has a set frame rate, and the other does not. One is 90 minutes plus of film, and the other is about two to four minutes of still photographs. One is manual in operation, and the other is totally automatic with set standards. One is high definition, and the other is basic standard defintition photography. Oh, they are all basically the same(turns sarcasm button off )

3D will cause a headache with anyone that watches long enough, just like your posts
will induce a headache in any rational person

Anyone that watches regular television enough will also get a headache, not to mention a fatter belly, high blood pressure, and a increased rate of a heart attack. My posts contain more information than your limited brain capacity can store.

I stand by what I say, if you are too ignorant to pay attention, thats your problem

Wow, if this isn't a rubber stamp to remain ignorant and uneducated, then I don't know what is.

So you can add the naturally dim plasma display with really dim 3D tech, what fun that will be.
Only thing more fun is when you turn the brightness up, and have screen burn in.
PROBABLY HEAR THE SCREAMING down here

You are the only dim thing in this conversation. You don't own a plasma, so how do you know what characteristic it has? You don't stupid, just like you don't have a clue about an actual bass note versus noise. If you view a 3D movie in the dark, you don't need to turn up the brightness to compensate for any loss of brightness when watching 3D. Of course this simple logic would elude a simpleton.

WATCH 3D teevee long enough and you won't see much either

Watch any teevee long enough and you won't see much either - which explains your inability to read more than 25% of anything.

[pixelthis]

[QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible][QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible][QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible][QUOTE=pixelthis]

Wow, this in depth explanation has the profoundness of a tea spoon of water sitting on flat pavement. If one had a cursory understanding of 3D, they would understand the depth of the ignorance of this statement. Analgraph 3D is so inferior to both polarized and shutter based systems it is pitiful. Can anyone say color distortion and loss of resolution?




Interesting statement considering one has a set frame rate, and the other does not. One is 90 minutes plus of film, and the other is about two to four minutes of still photographs. One is manual in operation, and the other is totally automatic with set standards. One is high definition, and the other is basic standard defintition photography. Oh, they are all basically the same(turns sarcasm button off )




Anyone that watches regular television enough will also get a headache, not to mention a fatter belly, high blood pressure, and a increased rate of a heart attack. My posts contain more information than your limited brain capacity can store.




Wow, if this isn't a rubber stamp to remain ignorant and uneducated, then I don't know what is.



You are the only dim thing in this conversation. You don't own a plasma, so how do you know what characteristic it has? You don't stupid, just like you don't have a clue about an actual bass note versus noise. If you view a 3D movie in the dark, you don't need to turn up the brightness to compensate for any loss of brightness when watching 3D. Of course this simple logic would elude a simpleton.






Watch any teevee long enough and you won't see much either - which explains your inability to read more than 25% of anything.

BLAH BLAH BLAH.
Well, look at the bright side, LCD with a more reflective screen, before you know it they will have screen burn in, shorter life span, and be so dim you have to sit right in front of one.
JUST LIKE A PLASMA !!!

[Sir Terrence the Terrible]

[QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible][QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible][QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible]

BLAH BLAH BLAH.
Well, look at the bright side, LCD with a more reflective screen, before you know it they will have screen burn in, shorter life span, and be so dim you have to sit right in front of one.
JUST LIKE A PLASMA !!!

This is another one of your more educatedly bankrupt statements. LCD don't have phosphors, so they cannot suffer from burn in. With LED lights doing the backlighting(or edge lighting), the life of them is a lot longer than CCFL backlights even if they are turned up a little higher.

There is zero evidence that a plasma panel has any shorter life than a LCD panel. Is there any more lies you would like to spread?

[pixelthis]

[QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible][QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible][QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible][QUOTE=pixelthis]

This is another one of your more educatedly bankrupt statements. LCD don't have phosphors, so they cannot suffer from burn in. With LED lights doing the backlighting(or edge lighting), the life of them is a lot longer than CCFL backlights even if they are turned up a little higher.

There is zero evidence that a plasma panel has any shorter life than a LCD panel. Is there any more lies you would like to spread?

Is english your second language? OR ARE YOU SO DENSE you can't understand sarcasm?
Of course LCD DOESNT HAVE PHOSPERS (duh).
One of the many reasons its superior to plasma, clueless one.

[Sir Terrence the Terrible]

[QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible][QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible][QUOTE=pixelthis][QUOTE=Sir Terrence the Terrible]

Is english your second language? OR ARE YOU SO DENSE you can't understand sarcasm?
Of course LCD DOESNT HAVE PHOSPERS (duh).
One of the many reasons its superior to plasma, clueless one.

You are soooooo stupid sometimes, I don't know your sarcasm from your just plain idiocrasy.

Sorry, but with 3D LCD is not superior, plasma is. If you actually owned a 3D set, you would know this. I suppose this is sacrasm as well.......

[reilly]

I would prefer LED LCD because it gives it a more HD look to the screen.

[StevenSurprenant]

Personal experiences...

My TV's all have the reflective screens. In my living room I have one window behind me and that causes a major problem when viewing TV in the day time. I use a blackout shade to block out this light and that works very well. I also have side windows that aren't nearly as much of a problem as the back window, but on very bright days, it can be distracting. I use bottom up/top down shades on these windows which only subdue the light to a degree and that solves that problem. The side window shades are not blackout shades.

When watching TV at night, I use lights behind the TV and they work perfectly to keep the room bright enough to see and to reduce the eye strain caused by watching TV in the dark. There are no reflections on the screen with this method.

I tried lights in front of the screen and they created reflections so that is not a viable solution. The behind the screen lights I use are CFL lights used for under the counter in the kitchen.

In my other room, I have curtains covering a side window and so reflections are not an issue there. When I watch at night, I have two small lamps sitting below and on each side of the screen. The shades block a great deal of the light and so the brightest light is bounced off the wall behind the TV and the ceiling. The lamps in this room use low power incandescent bulbs. I tried CFL, but the light "color" was too distracting.

I have no experience with 3D TV and so I cannot say how this would work with that technology.

I suppose that if you used extremely bright lights in either method I mentioned, it could cause problems, so light intensity is probably important.

I hope this helps.

[TECHNICAL 1]

I would prefer LED LCD because it gives it a more HD look to the screen.

led is what i am up 4 got high contrast longest life span best look and best picture check out some jap tvs those guys are wild i see led hd 3600 -2400 lines res 4mm thick panel full voice control at least it understands english it is even powered wirelessly some kind of a coil loop power transfer system all signals via wi fi